IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v19y2018i3_supplps54-s71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Logit Model to Predict Innovativeness among Mobile Telecom Service Users

Author

Listed:
  • Anand Thakur
  • Lokesh Jasrai

Abstract

Innovativeness in consumers accelerates the innovative behaviour resulting into successful adoption and diffusion of innovation. Despite extensive literature available on consumer innovativeness (CI), the present study identifies a research gap on the relationship between demographics and innovativeness for telecom services as a specific domain. The research draws on investigating the impact of demographic antecedents on CI aiming to differentiate the customers in two distinct categories, namely, low and high innovativeness for effective target marketing. A logit model has been applied in this research indicating the effect of overall contribution of multi-category variables as well as contribution of each parameter by considering age, gender, income and family life cycle as explanatory variables. The results of binary logistic regression indicate age as the better predictor of innovativeness followed by gender and family life cycle, whereas income is considered as an insignificant variable. The study offers implications for designing effective marketing mix and using consumers’ innovativeness for successful diffusion and adoption in mobile telecom services.

Suggested Citation

  • Anand Thakur & Lokesh Jasrai, 2018. "A Logit Model to Predict Innovativeness among Mobile Telecom Service Users," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 54-71, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:19:y:2018:i:3_suppl:p:s54-s71
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150917713814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150917713814
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150917713814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Vandecasteele & M. Geuens, 2008. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept and Measurement," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/532, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Roehrich, Gilles, 2004. "Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 671-677, June.
    3. Kiran Karande & Altaf Merchant & K. Sivakumar, 2011. "Erratum to: Relationships among time orientation, consumer innovativeness, and innovative behavior: the moderating role of product characteristics," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(2), pages 99-116, June.
    4. Midgley, David F & Dowling, Grahame R, 1978. "Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(4), pages 229-242, March.
    5. Costinel DOBRE & Anca DRAGOMIR & Gheorghe PREDA, 2009. "Consumer innovativeness: a marketing approach," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 4(2), Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lokesh Jasrai, 2014. "Measuring Mobile Telecom Service Innovativeness Among Youth," Paradigm, , vol. 18(1), pages 103-116, June.
    2. Arun Kumar Kaushik & Zillur Rahman, 2016. "Self-service innovativeness scale: introduction, development, and validation of scale," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 10(4), pages 799-822, December.
    3. Catherine Viot & Caroline Bayart & Agnes Lancini, 2017. "The Consumer Intention to Adopt Smart Connected-Products: Does the Category Matter?," Post-Print hal-01991186, HAL.
    4. Tahani Z. Aldahdouh & Petri Nokelainen & Vesa Korhonen, 2020. "Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    5. Hossein Nasiri Zarandi & Fereshteh Lotfizadeh, 2016. "The Influence of Cognitive Innovativeness on the Behavior and Style of Consumer Adoption: Implications for Electronic-Banking Service Adoption," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 90-103, October.
    6. Hélia Gonçalves Pereira & Maria Fátima Salgueiro & Paulo Rita, 2017. "Online determinants of e-customer satisfaction: application to website purchases in tourism," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(2), pages 375-403, June.
    7. Johan Jansson, 2011. "Consumer eco‐innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 192-210, March.
    8. Chao, Chih-Wei & Reid, Mike & Mavondo, Felix T., 2012. "Consumer innovativeness influence on really new product adoption," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 211-217.
    9. Seok Chan Jeong & Beom-Jin Choi, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Consumers’ Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption and Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    10. Shahid Rasool & Asif Ayub Kiyani & Fadilah Binti Siali & Hiram Ting & Mahani Mohammad Abdu Shakur, 2017. "Consumer Innovativeness in Consumer - Company Relationship and Mediating Role of Consumer Value: An Empirical Study of Cell Phone Users in Pakistan," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 379-388.
    11. Park, Jungkun & Gunn, Frances & Lee, YoungHee & Shim, Scott, 2015. "Consumer acceptance of a revolutionary technology-driven product: The role of adoption in the industrial design development," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 115-124.
    12. Kislev, Mickey M. & Kislev, Shira, 2020. "The Market Trajectory of a Radically New Product: E-Cigarettes," MPRA Paper 104425, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Das, Manish & Shah, Dhara & Shankar, Amit, 2021. "Deciphering in-store-online switching in multi-channel retailing context: Role of affective commitment to purchase situation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Olumide Olasimbo Jaiyeoba & Frederick Odongo Opeda, 2013. "Impact of Consumer Innovativeness on Shopping Styles: A Case-Study of Limkokwing University Students (Botswana)," Business and Management Horizons, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 107-117, December.
    15. Lin, Zhibin & Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "Airline passengers’ continuance intention towards online check-in services: The role of personal innovativeness and subjective knowledge," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 158-168.
    16. Heidenreich, Sven & Kraemer, Tobias, 2015. "Passive innovation resistance: The curse of innovation? Investigating consequences for innovative consumer behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 134-151.
    17. Adisu Fanta Bate & Esther Wanjiru Wachira & Sándor Danka, 2023. "The determinants of innovation performance: an income-based cross-country comparative analysis using the Global Innovation Index (GII)," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Truong, Yann & Klink, Richard R. & Simmons, Geoff & Grinstein, Amir & Palmer, Mark, 2017. "Branding strategies for high-technology products: The effects of consumer and product innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 85-91.
    19. Sylwia Badowska & Anna Rogala, 2016. "Consumer Innovation and Senior Consumers’ Behaviour – Research Results (Konsumencka innowacyjnosci a zachowania konsumentow seniorow – wyniki badan)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(59), pages 204-223.
    20. Jahanmir, Sara F. & Cavadas, Joana, 2018. "Factors affecting late adoption of digital innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 337-343.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:19:y:2018:i:3_suppl:p:s54-s71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.