IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v39y2021i4p781-799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Leino
  • Eeva Puumala

Abstract

Co-creation has become a globally popular concept in different sectors of the society. Its promise lies in breaking down hierarchies between local government, business life, universities, citizens and other stakeholders. Instead of being a top-down or bottom-up process, co-creation involves a multi-directional approach to problem solving. In this article, we scrutinize the capacity of co-creation to transform the practices of public sector in the context of urban development. In this way, we discuss both the potential and limitations of applying co-creation to the enhancement of citizen participation in cities. While new ways of acting can create novel spaces for opportunity, they also bring new winners and losers to the fore. After all, citizens are not all the same: they fall in several categories and some of them have more resources to participate in co-creative processes than others. Thus, it is relevant to know who participate in and whose voices get heard through these processes. We claim that to realise the participatory potential of co-creation, it is crucial to scrutinize actual practices through and networks within which it takes place. Through three co-creative processes from Finland, we illustrate that the promotion of participation through co-creation necessitates acknowledging the heterogeneity of citizens and taking seriously issues of urban social justice and inclusion. In conclusion, we identify issues regarding the sustainability and accessibility of participation that must be unpacked, if co-creative processes are to be used in the context of urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Leino & Eeva Puumala, 2021. "What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 781-799, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:781-799
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654420957337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654420957337
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654420957337?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Durose, 2011. "Revisiting Lipsky: Front‐Line Work in UK Local Governance," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 59(4), pages 978-995, December.
    2. Lorna Uden & Marja Naaranoja, 2011. "Co-creation of value for a public service," International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 427-445.
    3. Martin Kornberger & Renate E. Meyer & Christof Brandtner & Markus A. Höllerer, 2017. "When Bureaucracy Meets the Crowd : Studying “Open Government” in the Vienna City Administration," Post-Print hal-02311976, HAL.
    4. Stephen P Osborne & Zoe Radnor & Kirsty Strokosch, 2016. "Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 639-653, May.
    5. Paula Rossi & Sanna Tuurnas, 2021. "Conflicts fostering understanding of value co-creation and service systems transformation in complex public service systems," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 254-275, February.
    6. Helena Leino & Minna Santaoja & Markus Laine, 2018. "Researchers as knowledge brokers: translating knowledge or co-producing legitimacy? An urban infill case from Finland," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 119-129, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huihui Liu & Pim Martens, 2023. "Stakeholder Participation for Nature-Based Solutions: Inspiration for Rural Area’s Sustainability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Pourjahanshahi, Fatemeh & Mollahosseini, Ali & Dehyadegari, Saeid, 2023. "Website quality and users' intention to use digital libraries: Examining users’ attitudes, online co-creation experiences, and eWOM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Katharina Halbmayer & Jutta Hollands & Sara Alasu & Azra Korjenic & Barbara Pichler & Elisabeth Reitinger & Eva Zojer & Bente Knoll & Agnes Renkin & Ralf Dopheide, 2021. "GREEN: Cool & Care—Research and Development of Greening Measures in Nursing Homes in Austria. Technical and Social Interconnections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. GARDZIULEVIČIENĖ Laura & RAIŠYS Simonas Juozapas & RAIŠIENĖ Agota Giedrė, 2022. "Drivers Fostering Citizens to Participate in Co-Creation Process for Public Service Quality," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 88(1), pages 55-68, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Adriana Banozic-Tang & Araz Taeihagh, 2022. "Perspective on research–policy interface as a partnership: The study of best practices in CREATE [Bridging the Research-Practice Gap]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(5), pages 801-805.
    3. Evelien Tonkens & Imrat Verhoeven, 2019. "The civic support paradox: Fighting unequal participation in deprived neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1595-1610, June.
    4. Md Altab Hossin & Jie Du & Lei Mu & Isaac Owusu Asante, 2023. "Big Data-Driven Public Policy Decisions: Transformation Toward Smart Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    5. Pwint Kay Khine & Jianing Mi & Raza Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Manuel Alméstar & Sara Romero-Muñoz & Nieves Mestre & Uriel Fogué & Eva Gil & Amanda Masha, 2023. "(Un)Likely Connections between (Un)Likely Actors in the Art/NBS Co-Creation Process: Application of KREBS Cycle of Creativity to the Cyborg Garden Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Buics, László & Eisinger Balassa, Boglárka, 2020. "Analyzing Public Service Processes from Customer and Employee Perspectives by Using Service Blueprinting and Business Process Modelling," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2020), Virtual Conference, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Virtual Conference, 10-12 September 2020, pages 195-211, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    8. Chris Hastie, 2021. "The Perpetuation of Inequality: The Role of Community Engagement," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 759-767, September.
    9. Bartsits, Igor (Барциц, Игорь) & Borshchevskiy, Georgiy (Борщевский, Георгий) & Magomedov, Kerem (Магомедов, Керем), 2018. "Current State and Development Trends of the State Civil Service in Russia [Современное Состояние И Тенденции Развития Государственной Гражданской Службы В России: Аналитический Доклад]," Published Papers 011807, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    10. Bergerum, Carolina & Wolmesjö, Maria & Thor, Johan, 2022. "Organising and managing patient and public involvement to enhance quality improvement—Comparing a Swedish and a Dutch hospital," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 603-612.
    11. Pascal Frucquet & David Carassus & Didier Chabaud & Pierre Marin, 2021. "Influence of public policies of Smart Cities and Smart Territories on the renewal of local governance [L’influence des politiques publiques de Villes et Territoires Intelligents sur la rénovation d," Post-Print hal-03543436, HAL.
    12. Smotritskaya, I., 2023. "Public governance: Towards dialogue and cooperation?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 246-252.
    13. Maria Stella Righettini, 2021. "Framing Sustainability. Evidence from Participatory Forums to Taylor the Regional 2030 Agenda to Local Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Bassi Andrea, 2023. "The Relationship Between Public Administration and Third Sector Organizations: Voluntary Failure Theory and Beyond," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 14(4), pages 385-404, October.
    15. Rocco Agrifoglio & Concetta Metallo & Primiano Nauta, 2021. "Understanding Knowledge Management in Public Organizations through the Organizational Knowing Perspective: a Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    16. Faiz Gallouj & Luis Rubalcaba & Marja Toivonen & Paul Windrum, 2018. "Understanding social innovation in services industries," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 551-569, July.
    17. Aurelio Tommasetti & Riccardo Mussari & Gennaro Maione & Daniela Sorrentino, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    18. BARCEVICIUS Egidijus & CIBAITE Guonda & CODAGNONE Cristiano & GINEIKYTE Vaida & KLIMAVICIUTE Luka & LIVA Giovanni & MATULEVIC Loreta & MISURACA Gianluca & VANINI Irene, 2019. "Exploring Digital Government transformation in the EU," JRC Research Reports JRC118857, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Carolina Isaza Espinosa & Juan Carlos Henao & Santiago Tellez Cañas, 2021. "Disrupción tecnológica, transformación digital y sociedad. Tomo II, Políticas y públicas y regulación en las tecnologías disruptivas," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1281, October.
    20. Michael John Norton, 2021. "Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:781-799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.