IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v136y2024ics0264837723004271.html

Relationship between sense of place and co-creation process: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Meetiyagoda, Lakshika
  • Mahanama, P.K.S.
  • Ley, Astrid
  • Amarawickrama, Susantha

Abstract

Co-creation has been embraced as a new participatory strategy for place-making. The reasons behind the agency that gets public participation for co-creation are not yet explored, but some research indicates sense of place is an intrinsic motivation for participation. Thus, this paper systematically explores whether the prevailing literature has revealed the relationship between sense of place and the co-creation process. Of the 1636 publications from 2002 to 2022, 75 were subjected to in-depth content analysis. However, only 22 articles indicate the relationship between sense of place and the co-creation process. Further, some studies empirically demonstrated that the sense of place has a positive role in the co-creation process and engagement in the co-creation process enhances the sense of place. As such the prevailing studies focus on non-urban, non-spatial and in the global north contexts, this systematic literature review depicts the lack of urban place-making-related research on the relationship from the global south.

Suggested Citation

  • Meetiyagoda, Lakshika & Mahanama, P.K.S. & Ley, Astrid & Amarawickrama, Susantha, 2024. "Relationship between sense of place and co-creation process: A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004271
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chenhan Jiang & Yiqi Xiao & Hongyi Cao, 2020. "Co-Creating for Locality and Sustainability: Design-Driven Community Regeneration Strategy in Shanghai’s Old Residential Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Emma Puerari & Jotte I. J. C. De Koning & Timo Von Wirth & Philip M. Karré & Ingrid J. Mulder & Derk A. Loorbach, 2018. "Co-Creation Dynamics in Urban Living Labs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    4. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    5. van Eijk & Steen, 2014. "Why People Co-Produce: Analysing citizens' perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 358-382, April.
    6. Beatriz Casais & Patrícia Monteiro, 2019. "Residents’ involvement in city brand co-creation and their perceptions of city brand identity: a case study in Porto," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(4), pages 229-237, December.
    7. Helena Leino & Eeva Puumala, 2021. "What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 781-799, June.
    8. Shmuel Shamai & Zinaida Ilatov, 2005. "Measuring Sense Of Place: Methodological Aspects," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(5), pages 467-476, December.
    9. Jake Nelson & Jeong Joo Ahn & Elizabeth A. Corley, 2020. "Sense of place: trends from the literature," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 236-261, April.
    10. Peter J. Ellery & Jane Ellery, 2019. "Strengthening Community Sense of Place through Placemaking," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 237-248.
    11. Cosimo Talò & Terri Mannarini & Alessia Rochira, 2014. "Sense of Community and Community Participation: A Meta-Analytic Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 1-28, May.
    12. Suntikul, Wantanee & Jachna, Timothy, 2016. "The co-creation/place attachment nexus," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 276-286.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dazhi Liu & Jiaqi Xu & Hongxiang Song, 2025. "The Study of Social Interaction and Sense of Place in Private Art Museums of Eastern China from the Perspective of Cultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Chan, Ho-Yin & Cheng, Dawei & Chen, Anthony, 2024. "Routes with roots: Pedestrian route choices and sense of place of an urban university community," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Formolli, M. & Kleiven, T. & Lobaccaro, G., 2023. "Assessing solar energy accessibility at high latitudes: A systematic review of urban spatial domains, metrics, and parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. repec:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:10:p:726-748 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Abdulkarim. K. Alhowaish, 2025. "The Blue Economy in the Arabian Gulf: Trends, Gaps, and Pathways for Sustainable Coastal Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Nandini Halder & Manoj Kumar & Akshay Deepak & Shailendra K. Mandal & Amjad Azmeer & Basit A. Mir & Anissa Nurdiawati & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2025. "The Role of Urban Greenery in Enhancing Thermal Comfort: Systematic Review Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-30, March.
    5. Nirojan JASINTHA, 2023. "What Is Known And Unknown: A Bibliometric Analysis Of Organizational Politics," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 5-16, June.
    6. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-41, August.
    7. Emilio Rossi & Erminia Attaianese, 2023. "Research Synergies between Sustainability and Human-Centered Design: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Teresa Turzo, 2025. "Corporate social responsibility and spirituality: emerging paradigms and a future research agenda," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Smajlović Mediha Arnaut & Marić Esmeralda, 2025. "Mapping Environmental Consciousness In Marketing Literature," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 176-191.
    10. Habib Sadri & Ibrahim Yitmen & Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue & Florian Westphal & Algan Tezel & Afshin Taheri & Goran Sibenik, 2023. "Integration of Blockchain and Digital Twins in the Smart Built Environment Adopting Disruptive Technologies—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-46, February.
    11. Koen van der Zwet & Ana I Barros & Tom M van Engers & Peter M A Sloot, 2023. "Promises and pitfalls of computational modelling for insurgency conflicts," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 20(3), pages 333-350, July.
    12. Dorsa Alipour & Hussein Dia, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Role of Land Use, Transport, and Energy-Environment Integration in Shaping Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    13. Małgorzata Krzywonos & Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda & Przemysław Seruga & Beata Messyasz & Stanisław Mec, 2023. "The Use of Plants from the Lemnaceae Family for Biofuel Production—A Bibliometric and In-Depth Content Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Kyle Morrison & Yefeng Yang & Coralie Williams & Lorenzo Ricolfi & Malgorzata Lagisz & Shinichi Nakagawa, 2025. "Mapping meta-analyses on organochlorine pesticides reveals low methodological quality," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 8(11), pages 1270-1279, November.
    15. Shiqi Lu & Zalik Nuryana & Xiaoyu Ni & Wenbin Xu & Muhammad Nazir Alias, 2025. "A decade of educational robotics: trends and SDG contributions," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Alexandros Aristotelis Koupatsiaris & Hara Drinia, 2024. "Expanding Geoethics: Interrelations with Geoenvironmental Education and Sense of Place," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, February.
    17. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Towards Sustainable Entrepreneurship Holistic Construct," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-33, November.
    18. Karel Janda & Eva Michalikova & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha & Paulo Rotella Junior & Barbora Schererova & David Zilberman, 2022. "Review of the Impact of Biofuels on U.S. Retail Gasoline Prices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Shahrul Amri Mohamad & Rozniza Zaharudin & Hashim Fadzil Ariffin & Mazzlida Mat Deli, 2025. "Gagne’s Instructional Design in Vocational Training: Insights from A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 289-302, March.
    20. Sharma, Wamika & Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Verma, Aastha & Kumra, Rajeev, 2024. "Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    21. Qian Ma & Yandan Li & Yan Zhang, 2020. "Informetric Analysis of Highly Cited Papers in Environmental Sciences Based on Essential Science Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.