IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v20y2023i3p333-350.html

Promises and pitfalls of computational modelling for insurgency conflicts

Author

Listed:
  • Koen van der Zwet
  • Ana I Barros
  • Tom M van Engers
  • Peter M A Sloot

Abstract

Insurgency conflicts pose significant challenges to societies globally. The increase of insurgency conflicts creates a need to understand how insurgencies arise, and to identify societal drivers of insurgencies or effective strategies to counter them. In this paper, we analyze the contributions of computational modeling methods for the analysis of insurgent conflicts. We formalize a specific literature-based analysis framework using the identified key factors and drivers, which enables the evaluation of specific models in this domain. Through a systematic literature search, we identify 64 computational models to apply our framework. We highlight the development and contributions of various methodologies through an in-depth analysis of 13 high-quality models. The evaluation of these computational models revealed promising directions and future topics to design specific simulation models for all identified factors. In addition, our analysis revealed specific pitfalls concerning validity issues for each of the modeling methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Koen van der Zwet & Ana I Barros & Tom M van Engers & Peter M A Sloot, 2023. "Promises and pitfalls of computational modelling for insurgency conflicts," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 20(3), pages 333-350, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:333-350
    DOI: 10.1177/15485129211073612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129211073612
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15485129211073612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Child, Travers Barclay, 2019. "Conflict and counterinsurgency aid: Drawing sectoral distinctions," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Brailsford, Sally C. & Eldabi, Tillal & Kunc, Martin & Mustafee, Navonil & Osorio, Andres F., 2019. "Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 721-737.
    3. Choucri, Nazli & Goldsmith, Daniel & Madnick, Stuart E. & Mistree, Dinsha & Morrison, J. Bradley & Siegel, Michael, 2007. "Using System Dynamics to Model and Better Understand State Stability," Working papers 39650, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    4. Jae-Woo Kim & Robert Hanneman, 2011. "A Computational Model of Worker Protest," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 14(3), pages 1-1.
    5. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    6. Nigel Gilbert & Pietro Terna, 2000. "How to build and use agent-based models in social science," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 1(1), pages 57-72, March.
    7. Marc Keuschnigg & Niclas Lovsjö & Peter Hedström, 2018. "Analytical sociology and computational social science," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 3-14, January.
    8. Uri Wilensky & William Rand, 2007. "Making Models Match: Replicating an Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 10(4), pages 1-2.
    9. Juan Camilo Bohorquez & Sean Gourley & Alexander R. Dixon & Michael Spagat & Neil F. Johnson, 2009. "Common ecology quantifies human insurgency," Nature, Nature, vol. 462(7275), pages 911-914, December.
    10. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    11. Edward G. Anderson, 2011. "A dynamic model of counterinsurgency policy including the effects of intelligence, public security, popular support, and insurgent experience," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 27(2), pages 111-141, April.
    12. Maria Fonoberova & Vladimir A. Fonoberov & Igor Mezic & Jadranka Mezic & P. Jeffrey Brantingham, 2012. "Nonlinear Dynamics of Crime and Violence in Urban Settings," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 15(1), pages 1-2.
    13. Kathleen M. Carley, 2006. "Destabilization of covert networks," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 51-66, April.
    14. Cederman, Lars-Erik, 2003. "Modeling the Size of Wars: From Billiard Balls to Sandpiles," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(1), pages 135-150, February.
    15. Alex Braithwaite & Shane D. Johnson, 2012. "Space–Time Modeling of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Iraq," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 31-48, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Dahlke & Kristina Bogner & Matthias Mueller & Thomas Berger & Andreas Pyka & Bernd Ebersberger, 2020. "Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? Machine Learning (ML) In and For Agent-Based Modelling (ABM)," Papers 2003.11985, arXiv.org.
    2. G. David Garson, 2009. "Computerized Simulation in the Social Sciences," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 267-279, April.
    3. Luminita Nicolescu & Alexandra Barbu & Mihaita Ichim, "undated". "A Bibliometric Analysis of Anti-Consumption, Voluntary Simplicity, and Sustainable Consumption Trends in the Literature (2020 - 2025)," BASIQ Conference Proceedings 2025:023, Bucharest University of Economic Studies.
    4. Formolli, M. & Kleiven, T. & Lobaccaro, G., 2023. "Assessing solar energy accessibility at high latitudes: A systematic review of urban spatial domains, metrics, and parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. repec:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:10:p:726-748 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Abdulkarim. K. Alhowaish, 2025. "The Blue Economy in the Arabian Gulf: Trends, Gaps, and Pathways for Sustainable Coastal Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Nandini Halder & Manoj Kumar & Akshay Deepak & Shailendra K. Mandal & Amjad Azmeer & Basit A. Mir & Anissa Nurdiawati & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2025. "The Role of Urban Greenery in Enhancing Thermal Comfort: Systematic Review Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-30, March.
    8. Erik Pruyt & Jan H. Kwakkel, 2014. "Radicalization under deep uncertainty: a multi-model exploration of activism, extremism, and terrorism," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(1-2), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    10. Nirojan JASINTHA, 2023. "What Is Known And Unknown: A Bibliometric Analysis Of Organizational Politics," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 5-16, June.
    11. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-41, August.
    12. Emilio Rossi & Erminia Attaianese, 2023. "Research Synergies between Sustainability and Human-Centered Design: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Teresa Turzo, 2025. "Corporate social responsibility and spirituality: emerging paradigms and a future research agenda," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Smajlović Mediha Arnaut & Marić Esmeralda, 2025. "Mapping Environmental Consciousness In Marketing Literature," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 176-191.
    15. Habib Sadri & Ibrahim Yitmen & Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue & Florian Westphal & Algan Tezel & Afshin Taheri & Goran Sibenik, 2023. "Integration of Blockchain and Digital Twins in the Smart Built Environment Adopting Disruptive Technologies—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-46, February.
    16. Dorsa Alipour & Hussein Dia, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Role of Land Use, Transport, and Energy-Environment Integration in Shaping Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    17. Guardo-Martinez, Elisa & Onggo, Stephan & Kunc, Martin & Padrón, Silvia & Tomasella, Maurizio, 2026. "Robust airline scheduling with turnaround under uncertainty: towards collaborative airline scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Małgorzata Krzywonos & Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda & Przemysław Seruga & Beata Messyasz & Stanisław Mec, 2023. "The Use of Plants from the Lemnaceae Family for Biofuel Production—A Bibliometric and In-Depth Content Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    19. Kyle Morrison & Yefeng Yang & Coralie Williams & Lorenzo Ricolfi & Malgorzata Lagisz & Shinichi Nakagawa, 2025. "Mapping meta-analyses on organochlorine pesticides reveals low methodological quality," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 8(11), pages 1270-1279, November.
    20. Shiqi Lu & Zalik Nuryana & Xiaoyu Ni & Wenbin Xu & Muhammad Nazir Alias, 2025. "A decade of educational robotics: trends and SDG contributions," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    21. Ruiz-Meza, José & Montoya-Torres, Jairo R., 2022. "A systematic literature review for the tourist trip design problem: Extensions, solution techniques and future research lines," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:333-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.