IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v37y2026i1p74-98.html

Collaborative governance: The role of common institutional ownership in corporate environmental information disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Yishan Liu
  • Hu Liu
  • Wei He
  • Hanwen Deng
  • Umer Sahil Maqsood

Abstract

Transparency regarding environmental practices is crucial not only for ethical corporate governance but also for empowering consumers and investors to make informed decisions. This study examines the impact of common institutional ownership (CInOwn) on the extent of environmental information disclosure (EnvInfoDis) by publicly traded Chinese companies from 2010 to 2020. Using robust empirical analysis, we demonstrate a positive relationship between CInOwn and EnvInfoDis, suggesting that firms with shared institutional investors are more likely to disclose environmental information, fostering public trust and aligning with government expectations. We further investigate the underlying mechanisms, revealing that CInOwn strengthens internal controls, promoting improved EnvInfoDis practices. Notably, the findings remain robust across various tests, including using different CInOwn thresholds. This study offers significant contributions to the ongoing debate on CInOwn implications, paving the way for policy and economic interventions to support Chinese firms in integrating EnvInfoDis practices, ultimately contributing to societal sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yishan Liu & Hu Liu & Wei He & Hanwen Deng & Umer Sahil Maqsood, 2026. "Collaborative governance: The role of common institutional ownership in corporate environmental information disclosure," Energy & Environment, , vol. 37(1), pages 74-98, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:74-98
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X241244533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X241244533
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X241244533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Azar & Martin C. Schmalz & Isabel Tecu, 2018. "Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1513-1565, August.
    2. Mark Stephan, 2002. "Environmental Information Disclosure Programs: They Work, but Why?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 83(1), pages 190-205, March.
    3. He, Jie (Jack) & Huang, Jiekun & Zhao, Shan, 2019. "Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 400-418.
    4. Patten, Dennis M., 2002. "The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 763-773, November.
    5. Gao, Kaijuan & Shen, Hanxiao & Gao, Xi & Chan, Kam C., 2019. "The power of sharing: Evidence from institutional investor cross-ownership and corporate innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 284-296.
    6. Chen, Yangyang & Li, Qingyuan & Ng, Jeffrey & Wang, Chong, 2021. "Corporate financing of investment opportunities in a world of institutional cross-ownership," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    8. Beyer, Anne & Cohen, Daniel A. & Lys, Thomas Z. & Walther, Beverly R., 2010. "The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 296-343, December.
    9. He Xiao & Jianqun Xi, 2023. "The Impact of Institutional Cross‐ownership on Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(1), pages 86-105, March.
    10. Kang, Jun-Koo & Luo, Juan & Na, Hyun Seung, 2018. "Are institutional investors with multiple blockholdings effective monitors?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 576-602.
    11. Cheng, Xin & (Helen) Wang, He & Wang, Xianjue, 2022. "Common institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Brooks, Chris & Chen, Zhong & Zeng, Yeqin, 2018. "Institutional cross-ownership and corporate strategy: The case of mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 187-216.
    13. Koch, Andrew & Panayides, Marios & Thomas, Shawn, 2021. "Common ownership and competition in product markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 109-137.
    14. Healey, John & Mintz, Ofer, 2021. "What if your owners also own other firms in your industry? The relationship between institutional common ownership, marketing, and firm performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 838-856.
    15. Ziwei Wang & Chunfeng Wang & Zhenming Fang, 2023. "Common institutional ownership and corporate misconduct," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 102-136, January.
    16. Zhang, Jinzhu & Liu, Yu & Zhou, Meifang & Chen, Boyang & Liu, Yawen & Cheng, Baodong & Xue, Jinjun & Zhang, Wei, 2022. "Regulatory effect of improving environmental information disclosure under environmental tax in China: From the perspectives of temporal and industrial heterogeneity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Pontus Cerin, 2002. "Characteristics of environmental reporters on the OM Stockholm exchange," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(5), pages 298-311, September.
    18. Mert Gürlek & Muharrem Tuna, 2018. "Reinforcing competitive advantage through green organizational culture and green innovation," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7-8), pages 467-491, June.
    19. X. H. Meng & S. X. Zeng & X. M. Xie & G. Y. Qi, 2016. "The impact of product market competition on corporate environmental responsibility," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 267-291, March.
    20. Stav Fainshmidt & Michael A Witt & Ruth V Aguilera & Alain Verbeke, 2020. "The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(4), pages 455-466, June.
    21. Yi Yang & Congxu Yao & Ying Li, 2020. "The impact of the amount of environmental information disclosure on financial performance: The moderating effect of corporate internationalization," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2893-2907, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mou, Shaobo & Yi, Sijia & Zhang, Qiufeng & Liu, Danping, 2025. "Common institutional ownership and executive pay-performance sensitivity: Mediating role of information transparency and fund occupation," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Dai, Jingwen & Xu, Rong & Zhu, Tianqi & Lu, Chao, 2024. "Common institutional ownership and opportunistic insider selling: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Yishan Liu & Xingao Xu & Hongbo Hai & Hadi Hussain, 2025. "Does Shared Institutional Equity Enhance Corporate Eco-Transparency Reporting? Evidence from Firm Life Cycles Stages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-36, January.
    4. Liu, Xutang & Boubaker, Sabri & Liao, Jing & Yao, Shouyu, 2025. "The rise of common state ownership and corporate environmental performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    5. Hamza Nizar & Taher Hamza & Faten Lakhal, 2024. "How does institutional cross‐ownership affect firm productivity? The importance of the corporate social responsibility channel," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1988-2010, April.
    6. Wang, Shuangjin & Zhang, Xiaoqian & Cebula, Richard J. & Foley, Maggie, 2024. "Cross-shareholding, Managerial capabilities, and Strategic risk-taking in enterprises: A game or a win-win?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    7. Tang, Xudong & Jia, Yang & Li, Rui, 2024. "Common institutional ownership types and corporate innovation: A taxonomy based on whether the investees are in the same industry," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Zhou, Wei & Liu, Baohua & Chen, Tao & Chen, Yining, 2025. "Institutional investors' cross-ownership and internal control quality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    9. Xiaoyu Chen, 2025. "Common institutional ownership and commonality in liquidity: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(2), pages 1635-1668, June.
    10. Qian Ding & Jinyu Chen & Wu Chen, 2026. "Can Common Institutional Ownership Govern CSR Decoupling? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 204(2), pages 309-334, March.
    11. Li, Xiao-Lin & Hao, Jiawei & Liu, Liang, 2025. "Does common institutional ownership affect systemic risk of non-financial firms? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 235-255.
    12. Anting Li & Jianqiong Wang & Yaru Yang, 2026. "Dose common institutional ownership constrain tunneling?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1193-1228, April.
    13. Wenjun Su & Xiaohui Zhao, 2025. "The impact of common institutional ownership on green innovation of China’s energy firms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Ning, Zihao & Xu, Zhibo & Zheng, Pengju, 2024. "The impact of common institutional ownership on financialization in non-financial enterprise: Exacerbation or inhibition?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    15. Hao Ding, 2024. "Can common institutional ownership inhibit the formation of zombie firms? Evidence from China," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 38(1), pages 34-56, May.
    16. Jiong Wu & Lei Zhu & Yuheng Hu, 2024. "How does common ownership affect corporate innovation after succession in Chinese family firms? A perspective on value cocreation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3515-3544, December.
    17. Zhu, Siyuan & Lu, Rong & Xu, Tianli & Wu, Wenbin & Chen, Yang, 2024. "Can common institutional owners inhibit bad mergers and acquisitions? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 246-266.
    18. Zhang, Han & Li, Minghui & Yang, Yujie, 2024. "Does common institutional ownership constrain related party transactions? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 1015-1042.
    19. Wang, Jie & Chen, Liang & Li, Wanli, 2025. "Common institutional ownership and corporate trade credit," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Ziwei Wang & Chunfeng Wang & Zhenming Fang, 2023. "Common institutional ownership and corporate misconduct," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 102-136, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:74-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.