IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v35y2024i8p4294-4309.html

Assessing the effectiveness of environmental policies in the OECD countries: An advanced panel data estimation study

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Zhang
  • Samia Khalid
  • Hamid Mahmood

Abstract

Due to the rapid increase in industrialization, environmental degradation has recently grown into a serious problem. The existing literature has mostly focused on the reduction of CO2 emissions and ignored PM2.5 emissions, which have a direct impact on the environment through air quality. Therefore, this study attempts to look into the effectiveness of environmental policies in determining environmental sustainability by lowering PM2.5 emissions in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. These are categorized as fiscal (green taxes), economic incentives, and research and development (R&D) investment policies. The second-generation panel co-integration method and Cross-Sectionally Autoregressive Distributed Lag (CS-ARDL) are employed for the period 1990–2019 to estimate the results. The Westerlund cointegration results confirmed a stable, long-run relationship between all the variables. The study shows that not all environmental regulations are equally successful in lowering PM2.5 emissions. According to the findings, R&D and fiscal policy help reduce PM2.5 emissions, whereas economic incentive strategies and population increase them. This shows that establishing green taxes on these emissions and developing green R&D policies will facilitate environmental sustainability. The overall findings let us classify some good performances in the OECD countries regarding the design of environmental policies, even though we should also keep in mind that there isn’t a solution that works for everyone. Policy makers should modify their plans in accordance with the nature and unique features of their country or region.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Zhang & Samia Khalid & Hamid Mahmood, 2024. "Assessing the effectiveness of environmental policies in the OECD countries: An advanced panel data estimation study," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(8), pages 4294-4309, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:35:y:2024:i:8:p:4294-4309
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231155492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X231155492
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X231155492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Das, Trishna & Krishnan, Venkat & McCalley, James D., 2015. "Assessing the benefits and economics of bulk energy storage technologies in the power grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 104-118.
    2. Zhao, Bingyu & Yang, Wanping, 2020. "Does financial development influence CO2 emissions? A Chinese province-level study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Stephen H. Schneider & Lawrence H. Goulder, 1997. "Achieving low-cost emissions targets," Nature, Nature, vol. 389(6646), pages 13-14, September.
    4. Swamy, P A V B, 1970. "Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(2), pages 311-323, March.
    5. Khan, Zeeshan & Ali, Shahid & Dong, Kangyin & Li, Rita Yi Man, 2021. "How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & Julie Poirier & Marion Hemar & Christian Michel, 2012. "Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(17), pages 2157-2170, June.
    7. David Popp, 2006. "Comparison of Climate Policies in the ENTICE-BR Model," The Energy Journal, , vol. 27(1_suppl), pages 163-174, January.
    8. Madsen, Jakob B. & Islam, Md. Rabiul & Doucouliagos, Hristos, 2018. "Inequality, financial development and economic growth in the OECD, 1870–2011," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 605-624.
    9. repec:aen:journl:2006v27-03-a03 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Machado, José A.F. & Santos Silva, J.M.C., 2019. "Quantiles via moments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 145-173.
    11. Dumitrescu, Elena-Ivona & Hurlin, Christophe, 2012. "Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1450-1460.
    12. Wang, Qiang & Zhang, Fuyu, 2021. "Free trade and renewable energy: A cross-income levels empirical investigation using two trade openness measures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1027-1039.
    13. Joakim Westerlund, 2007. "Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 69(6), pages 709-748, December.
    14. Muhammad Awais Baloch & Ilhan Ozturk & Festus Victor Bekun & Danish Khan, 2021. "Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 176-184, January.
    15. Adam B. Jaffe & Karen Palmer, 1997. "Environmental Regulation And Innovation: A Panel Data Study," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 79(4), pages 610-619, November.
    16. Hart, Rob, 2008. "The timing of taxes on CO2 emissions when technological change is endogenous," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 194-212, March.
    17. Chudik, Alexander & Pesaran, M. Hashem, 2015. "Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 393-420.
    18. Heyes, Anthony & Kapur, Sandeep, 2011. "Regulatory attitudes and environmental innovation in a model combining internal and external R&D," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 327-340, May.
    19. Valentina Bosetti & Carlo Carraro & Romain Duval & Alessandra Sgobbi & Massimo Tavoni, 2009. "The Role of R&D and Technology Diffusion in Climate Change Mitigation: New Perspectives Using the WITCH Model," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 664, OECD Publishing.
    20. Grafton, R. Quentin & Kompas, Tom & Long, Ngo Van & To, Hang, 2014. "US biofuels subsidies and CO2 emissions: An empirical test for a weak and a strong green paradox," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 550-555.
    21. Hashem Pesaran, M. & Yamagata, Takashi, 2008. "Testing slope homogeneity in large panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 50-93, January.
    22. Pesaran M.H. & Schuermann T. & Weiner S.M., 2004. "Modeling Regional Interdependencies Using a Global Error-Correcting Macroeconometric Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22, pages 129-162, April.
    23. Garrone, Paola & Grilli, Luca, 2010. "Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? An empirical investigation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5600-5613, October.
    24. Alvarez-Herranz, Agustin & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Cantos, José María, 2017. "Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 386-397.
    25. Fischer, Carolyn & Newell, Richard G., 2008. "Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 142-162, March.
    26. Ali M. Kutan & Sudharshan Reddy Paramati & Mallesh Ummalla & Abdulrasheed Zakari, 2018. "Financing Renewable Energy Projects in Major Emerging Market Economies: Evidence in the Perspective of Sustainable Economic Development," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 1761-1777, June.
    27. Reyer Gerlagh & Bob van der Zwaan, 2006. "Options and Instruments for a Deep Cut in CO2 Emissions: Carbon Dioxide Capture or Renewables, Taxes or Subsidies?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 27(3), pages 25-48, July.
    28. Nong, Duy & Simshauser, Paul & Nguyen, Duong Binh, 2021. "Greenhouse gas emissions vs CO2 emissions: Comparative analysis of a global carbon tax," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    29. repec:aen:journl:2006se-a07 is not listed on IDEAS
    30. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
    31. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Chaudhary, A.R. & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2017. "Does urbanization cause increasing energy demand in Pakistan? Empirical evidence from STIRPAT model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 83-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guan, Zepeng & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Sheikh, Muhammad Ramzan & Khan, Zeeshan & Gu, Xiao, 2023. "Unveiling the interconnectedness between energy-related GHGs and pro-environmental energy technology: Lessons from G-7 economies with MMQR approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    2. Chen, Liang & Guo, Yirong, 2023. "The drivers of sustainable development: Natural resources extraction and education for low-middle- and high-income countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    3. Ding, Yuanyi, 2023. "Does natural resources cause sustainable financial development or resources curse? Evidence from group of seven economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Talan, Amogh & Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Apostu, Simona-Andreea & Abbas, Shujaat, 2023. "Transition towards clean energy consumption in G7: Can financial sector, ICT and democracy help?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Wang, Xiang & Yin, Jian & Yang, Yao & Muda, Iskandar & Abduvaxitovna, Shamansurova Zilola & AlWadi, Belal Mahmoud & Castillo-Picon, Jorge & Abdul-Samad, Zulkiflee, 2023. "Relationship between the resource curse, Forest management and sustainable development and the importance of R&D Projects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    6. Mamkhezri, Jamal, 2025. "Assessing price elasticity in US residential electricity consumption: A comparison of monthly and annual data with recession implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Chang, Chiu-Lan & Fang, Ming, 2022. "Renewable energy-led growth hypothesis: New insights from BRICS and N-11 economies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 788-800.
    8. Bin Wang & Samia Khalid & Hamid Mahmood, 2024. "R&D Spending and Economic Policy Uncertainty in Asian Countries: an Advanced Panel Data Estimation Study," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4710-4729, March.
    9. Ma, Qiang & Murshed, Muntasir & Khan, Zeeshan, 2021. "The nexuses between energy investments, technological innovations, emission taxes, and carbon emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Aamir Javed & Bilal Haider Subhani & Asif Javed & Agnese Rapposelli, 2024. "Accessing the efficacy of green growth, energy efficiency, and green innovation for environmental performance in top manufacturing nations in the framework of sustainable development," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5829-5863, December.
    11. Ahmad, Mahmood & Jiang, Ping & Majeed, Abdul & Umar, Muhammad & Khan, Zeeshan & Muhammad, Sulaman, 2020. "The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Wu, Anbing & Chen, Junying & Zhang, Yanyan, 2023. "Natural resources and energy resources prices an answer to energy insecurity? The role of mineral, forest, coal resources and financial development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    13. Zhongwei, Huang & Liu, Yishu, 2022. "The role of eco-innovations, trade openness, and human capital in sustainable renewable energy consumption: Evidence using CS-ARDL approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 131-140.
    14. Li, Menghan & Zhang, Kaiyue & Alamri, Ahmad Mohammed & Ageli, Mohammed Moosa & Khan, Numan, 2023. "Resource curse hypothesis and sustainable development: Evaluating the role of renewable energy and R&D," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Zheng, Li & Yuan, Ling & Khan, Zeeshan & Badeeb, Ramez Abubakr & Zhang, Leilei, 2023. "How G-7 countries are paving the way for net-zero emissions through energy efficient ecosystem?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Stephen Taiwo Onifade & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi & Andrew Adewale Alola & Ilham Haouas, 2024. "Assessing the drivers of (non)conventional energy portfolios in the South Asian economies: The role of technological innovation and human development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1762-1773, June.
    17. Liu, Qiang & Zhao, Zhongwei & Liu, Yiran & He, Yao, 2022. "Natural resources commodity prices volatility, economic performance and environment: Evaluating the role of oil rents," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    18. Bilgehan Tekin, 2024. "The catalyzing role of financial inclusion in decoding environmental challenges and fostering a sustainable future in BRICS‐T," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 1572-1603, November.
    19. Hayat, Sikandar & Safi, Adnan & Wahab, Salman & Shahzad, Khurram & Chen, Yingying, 2023. "Renewable energy R&D and natural resources: A success story of environmentally friendly financing in OECD economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Mariam Camarero & Sergi Moliner & Cecilio Tamarit, 2025. "Which are the long-run determinants of US outward FDI? Evidence using large long-memory panels," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 259-290, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:35:y:2024:i:8:p:4294-4309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.