IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v17y1996i3p85-103.html

Market Power in a System of Tradeable CO2, Quotas

Author

Listed:
  • Hege Westskog

Abstract

This paper examines the connection between market power and the size of efficiency loss in a market for tradeable CO2 permits. Countries, not firms, are the players in the market. A situation is analyzed where some of the, participants have market power, i.e., they can influence the price of a CO2 quota. Each country with market power decides how many quotas to buy or sell, given the other market power countries' sales or purchases of quotas, and the behavior of countries without market power. The latter countries act as price takers. The market equilibrium is compared to a cost effective market situation in order to quantify the efficiency loss resulting from market power.

Suggested Citation

  • Hege Westskog, 1996. "Market Power in a System of Tradeable CO2, Quotas," The Energy Journal, , vol. 17(3), pages 85-103, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:17:y:1996:i:3:p:85-103
    DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol17-No3-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol17-No3-6
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol17-No3-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aen:journl:1991v12-02-a06 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Peter Bohm & Bjorn Larsen, 1994. "Fairness in a tradeable-permit treaty for carbon emissions reductions in Europe and the former Soviet Union," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4(3), pages 219-239, June.
    3. repec:aen:journl:1994v15-04-a07 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:isu:genstf:202502111727480000 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Wang, Xu & Wen, Ziyu & He, Lingyun & Zheng, Haoyang & Yang, Tengfei & Long, Ruyin, 2024. "The role of imperfect market structure in the employment effect of emissions trading scheme in China: A theoretical extension and empirical investigation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 920-937.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Böhringer, Christoph, 2003. "The Kyoto Protocol: A Review and Perspectives," ZEW Discussion Papers 03-61, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Ziheng Niu & Jianliang Xiong & Xuesong Ding & Yao Wu, 2022. "Analysis of China’s Carbon Peak Achievement in 2025," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Minxing Jiang & Bangzhu Zhu & Julien Chevallier & Rui Xie, 2018. "Allocating provincial CO2 quotas for the Chinese national carbon program," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(3), pages 457-479, July.
    4. Ying Fan & Xu Wang, 2014. "Which Sectors Should Be Included in the Ets in the Context of a Unified Carbon Market in China?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 25(3-4), pages 613-634, April.
    5. Xintao Li & Dong Feng & Jian Li & Zaisheng Zhang, 2019. "Research on the Spatial Network Characteristics and Synergetic Abatement Effect of the Carbon Emissions in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Zhou, P. & Wang, M., 2016. "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-59.
    7. Agnetis, Alessandro & Chen, Bo & Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea, 2019. "Price of fairness in two-agent single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 79-87.
    8. A. Denny Ellerman & Ian Sue Wing, 2000. "Supplementarity: An Invitation to Monopsony?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 21(4), pages 29-59, October.
    9. Karp, Larry S. & Liu, Xuemei, 1999. "Welfare Gains under Tradeable CO₂ Permits," CUDARE Working Papers 6254, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    10. Wang, Xu & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2018. "Transaction costs, market structure and efficient coverage of emissions trading scheme: A microlevel study from the pilots in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 657-671.
    11. Dan Wei & Adam Rose, 2009. "Interregional Sharing of Energy Conservation Targets in China: Efficiency and Equity," The Energy Journal, , vol. 30(4), pages 81-112, October.
    12. Böhringer, Christoph & Welsch, Heinz, 1999. "C & C - contraction and convergence of carbon emissions: the economic implications of permit trading," ZEW Discussion Papers 99-13, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. repec:aen:journl:ej37-si1-fan is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Yongbin Zhu & Zheng Wang, 2014. "An Optimal Balanced Economic Growth and Abatement Pathway for China Under the Carbon Emissions Budget," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 44(2), pages 253-268, August.
    15. Olivier Godard, 2011. "Climate justice, between global and international justice -Insights from justification theory," RSCAS Working Papers 2011/56, European University Institute.
    16. Karp, Larry S. & Liu, Xuemei, 1998. "Valuing Tradeable Co2 Permits For Oecd Countries," CUDARE Working Papers 25054, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    17. Loek Groot & Julia Swart, 2018. "Climate change control: the Lindahl solution," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 757-782, June.
    18. Liski, Matti, 2001. "Thin versus Thick CO2 Market," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 295-311, May.
    19. Kampas, Athanasios & Mamalis, Spyridon, 2006. "Assessing the Distributional Impacts of Transferable Pollution Permits: The Case of Phosphorus Pollution Management at a River Basin Scale," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, July.
    20. Bohringer, Christoph & Welsch, Heinz, 2004. "Contraction and Convergence of carbon emissions: an intertemporal multi-region CGE analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 21-39, January.
    21. Sun, Tao & Zhang, Hongwei & Wang, Yuan, 2013. "The application of information entropy in basin level water waste permits allocation in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 50-54.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:17:y:1996:i:3:p:85-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.