IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v27y2026i1p113-135.html

Differentiated protectionism in the European Union: The role of superstar exporters and fiscal capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Alessia Invernizzi
  • Aydin B. Yildirim
  • Arlo Poletti

Abstract

What factors drive trade-harmful protectionist policy interventions enacted by European Union (EU) member states? Although EU trade policy is placed under supranational competence, we highlight that trade policy decisions differ within and across the EU national governments. We explain this variation by building on the New New Trade Theory and argue that sectors dominated by highly productive ‘superstar exporters’ are less likely to receive protectionist support, yet governments with greater fiscal capacity are more likely to support these same sectors through non-tariff instruments such as subsidies – and, occasionally, even tariffs. Using data from the Global Trade Alert (2012–2022) and relying on Poisson regression analyses, we find support of our argument. These findings contribute to the literature on EU trade policy, New New Trade Theory and the domestic foundations of trade policy under supranational governance by highlighting the interaction between sectoral competitiveness and fiscal capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessia Invernizzi & Aydin B. Yildirim & Arlo Poletti, 2026. "Differentiated protectionism in the European Union: The role of superstar exporters and fiscal capacity," European Union Politics, , vol. 27(1), pages 113-135, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:113-135
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165251396435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165251396435
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165251396435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Savina Gygli & Florian Haelg & Niklas Potrafke & Jan-Egbert Sturm, 2019. "Publisher Correction to: The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 575-575, September.
    2. Ballor, Grace A. & Yildirim, Aydin B., 2020. "Multinational Corporations and the Politics of International Trade in Multidisciplinary Perspective," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 573-586, December.
    3. Ehrlich, Sean D., 2011. "Access Points: An Institutional Theory of Policy Bias and Policy Complexity," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199737543.
    4. Rickard, Stephanie J., 2022. "Economic Geography, Politics, and the World Trade Regime," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 367-379, July.
    5. Baccini, Leonardo & Pinto, Pablo M. & Weymouth, Stephen, 2017. "The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-Level Evidence," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(2), pages 373-395, April.
    6. Andrew B. Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott, 2012. "The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 4(1), pages 283-313, July.
    7. Colin Mason & Ross Brown, 2013. "Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 211-225, February.
    8. Lee, Haillie Na-Kyung & Liou, Yu-Ming, 2022. "Where You Work Is Where You Stand: A Firm-Based Framework for Understanding Trade Opinion," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 713-740, March.
    9. Marcel Hanegraaff & Arlo Poletti & Emile Van Ommeren, 2024. "Firms and Trade Policy Lobbying in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 629-652, May.
    10. Gaulier, Guillaume & Zignago, Soledad, 2004. "Notes on BACI (analytical database of international trade). 1989-2002 version," MPRA Paper 32401, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Cameron, David R., 1978. "The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(4), pages 1243-1261, December.
    12. Marc J. Melitz, 2003. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1695-1725, November.
    13. Luuk Schmitz & Timo Seidl, 2023. "As Open as Possible, as Autonomous as Necessary: Understanding the Rise of Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 834-852, May.
    14. Flaherty, Thomas M. & Rogowski, Ronald, 2021. "Rising Inequality As a Threat to the Liberal International Order," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 495-523, February.
    15. Dani Rodrik, 1998. "Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(5), pages 997-1032, October.
    16. Roman Stöllinger & Mario Holzner, 2017. "State Aid and Export Competitiveness in the EU," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 203-236, June.
    17. Broz, J. Lawrence & Frieden, Jeffry & Weymouth, Stephen, 2021. "Populism in Place: The Economic Geography of the Globalization Backlash," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 464-494, February.
    18. Marc J. Melitz & Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano, 2008. "Market Size, Trade, and Productivity (DOI:10.111/j.1467-937x.2007.00463.x)," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(3), pages 985-985.
    19. Dan Ciuriak & Beverly Lapham & Robert Wolfe & Terry Collins-Williams & John Curtis, 2015. "Firms in International Trade: Trade Policy Implications of the New New Trade Theory," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 6(2), pages 130-140, May.
    20. Simon J Evenett, 2019. "Protectionism, state discrimination, and international business since the onset of the Global Financial Crisis," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 9-36, March.
    21. Rickard, Stephanie, 2022. "Economic geography, politics, and the world trade regime," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113857, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    22. Italo Colantone & Piero Stanig, 2018. "The Trade Origins of Economic Nationalism: Import Competition and Voting Behavior in Western Europe," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 936-953, October.
    23. Baccini, Leonardo & Guidi, Mattia & Poletti, Arlo & Yildirim, Aydin B., 2022. "Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Institutions," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(1), pages 70-104, January.
    24. Marc J. Melitz & Giancarlo I. P. Ottaviano, 2021. "Market Size, Trade, and Productivity," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Firms and Workers in a Globalized World Larger Markets, Tougher Competition, chapter 4, pages 87-108, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    25. Manfred Elsig & Cédric Dupont, 2012. "European Union Meets South Korea: Bureaucratic Interests, Exporter Discrimination and the Negotiations of Trade Agreements," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 492-507, May.
    26. Rogowski, Ronald, 1987. "Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1121-1137, December.
    27. Elhanan Helpman & Oleg Itskhoki & Stephen Redding, 2010. "Inequality and Unemployment in a Global Economy," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1239-1283, July.
    28. Sophie Meunier & Kalypso Nicolaidis, 2019. "The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 103-113, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haas, Levi & Schenk-Hoppé, Klaus R., 2019. "International Trade: Smarten up to talk the talk," MPRA Paper 99096, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Manova, Kalina & Yu, Zhihong, 2017. "Multi-product firms and product quality," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 116-137.
    3. Bailey, Michael & Gupta, Abhinav & Hillenbrand, Sebastian & Kuchler, Theresa & Richmond, Robert & Stroebel, Johannes, 2021. "International trade and social connectedness," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Osman S Kiratli, 2023. "Loving globalization: High-growth enterprises and public opinion on globalization in Europe," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(2), pages 286-306, June.
    5. Melitz, Marc J. & Redding, Stephen J., 2014. "Heterogeneous Firms and Trade," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 1-54, Elsevier.
    6. Andersen, Torben M. & Sørensen, Allan, 2023. "The interdependencies between the private and public sectors in open economies," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. Alcalá, Francisco, 2016. "Specialization across goods and export quality," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 216-232.
    8. Dobbelaere, Sabien & Kiyota, Kozo, 2018. "Labor market imperfections, markups and productivity in multinationals and exporters," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 198-212.
    9. Carlo Perroni & Davide Suverato, 2023. "Skills scarcity and export intensity," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 719-757, May.
    10. Catia Montagna & Antonella Nocco, 2015. "(De)Unionization, Trade Liberalization and Selection," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(1), pages 91-122, February.
    11. Chen, Natalie & Juvenal, Luciana, 2022. "Markups, quality, and trade costs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    12. Brambilla, Irene & Porto, Guido G., 2016. "High-income export destinations, quality and wages," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 21-35.
    13. Ming Xu & Tenglong Zhong & Qian Xie & Hongkui Liu, 2022. "Foreign Demand, Competition Strategy, and Export Markups: Evidence from Chinese Multi‐Product Exporters," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(3), pages 187-209, May.
    14. Jha, Priyaranjan & Rodriguez-Lopez, Antonio, 2021. "Monopsonistic labor markets and international trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    15. Michael Koch, 2016. "Skills, Tasks and the Scarcity of Talent in a Global Economy," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 536-563, August.
    16. Markus Thomas Münter, 2023. "Endogenous Entry and Growth of Firms with Heterogeneous Firms," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 63(1), pages 21-39, August.
    17. Lucas FERRERO & Carlos Matías HISGEN, 2014. "Determinants of exports intensity of industrial SMEs in Argentina," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 14(2).
    18. Crinò, Rosario & Bonfiglioli, Alessandra & Gancia, Gino, 2021. "International Trade with Heterogeneous Firms: Theory and Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 16249, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    19. Catia Montagna & Antonella Nocco, 2013. "Unionization, international integration, and selection," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 46(1), pages 23-45, February.
    20. Alvaro Garcia-Marin & Nico Voigtländer, 2019. "Exporting and Plant-Level Efficiency Gains: It's in the Measure," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(4), pages 1777-1825.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:113-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.