IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v23y2002i4p491-528.html

Worker Participation and Teams: New Evidence from Analyzing Organizational Ethnographies

Author

Listed:
  • Randy Hodson

    (Ohio State University)

Abstract

Most large organizations are today experimenting with heightened employee involvement, including self-monitoring teams, joint programs with unions and limited degrees of worker ownership such as those based on employee stock ownership programs. In spite of the widespread adoption of such programs, relatively little is known about their consequences for employee behavior and attitudes. In particular, little is known about the relative strengths and limitations of different programs. The current article evaluates a range of programs involving heightened employee involvement using data derived from content coding program characteristics, worker behaviors and worklife experiences from the existing set of book length organizational ethnographies (N = 122). The results suggest that all forms of worker participation offer improved worklife experiences and reduced workplace conflict relative to the absence of these programs. Self-monitoring teams, however, perform no better than joint union-management programs or than more traditional work teams along the dimensions of worker autonomy, pride, satisfaction and cooperation. The sole unique contribution of contemporary self-monitoring teams appears to be a lowering of strike probabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Randy Hodson, 2002. "Worker Participation and Teams: New Evidence from Analyzing Organizational Ethnographies," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 23(4), pages 491-528, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:23:y:2002:i:4:p:491-528
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X02234003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X02234003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X02234003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ragin, Charles C., 2000. "Fuzzy-Set Social Science," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226702773, September.
    2. Anne-Marie Greene & Peter Ackers & John Black, 2001. "Lost Narratives? From Paternalism to Team-Working in a Lock Manufacturing Firm," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, May.
    3. Klas Levinson, 2000. "Codetermination in Sweden: Myth and Reality," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 21(4), pages 457-473, November.
    4. Anne Sey, 2000. "Team Work in Japan: Revolution, Evolution or No Change at All?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 21(4), pages 475-503, November.
    5. Joyce Rothschild & Marjukka Ollilainen, 1999. "Obscuring But Not Reducing Managerial Control: Does TQM Measure up to Democracy Standards?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 20(4), pages 583-623, November.
    6. Berndt K. Keller, 1995. "Rapporteur's Report: Emerging Models of Worker Participation and Representation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 317-327, September.
    7. Andrew Pendleton & Nicholas Wilson & Mike Wright, 1998. "The Perception and Effects of Share Ownership: Empirical Evidence from Employee Buy-Outs," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 99-123, March.
    8. Stephen P. Keef, 1998. "The Causal Association Between Employee Share Ownership and Attitudes: a Study Based on the Long Framework," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 73-82, March.
    9. Rosemary Batt & Eileen Appelbaum, 1995. "Worker Participation in Diverse Settings: Does the Form Affect the Outcome, and If So, Who Benefits?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 353-378, September.
    10. Batt, R. & Applebaum, E., 1995. "Worker Participation in Diverse Settings: Does the Form Affect the Outcome, and If So, Who Benefits?," Papers 95-06, Cornell - Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
    11. Joel Rogers & Wolfgang Streeck, 1995. "Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number roge95-1, January.
    12. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226702766 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Stephen Hill, 1991. "Why Quality Circles Failed but Total Quality Management Might Succeed," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(4), pages 541-568, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zuzanna Kowalik, 2025. "Working from Home and Job Satisfaction: A Mediating Effect of Organisational Culture," IBS Working Papers 04/2025, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    2. Taylan Acar, 2018. "Variation in worker responses to subcontracted employment: A qualitative case study," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(2), pages 332-356, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:lan:wpaper:4012 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. A I Petrescu & R Simmons & S Bradley, 2004. "The impacts of human resource management practices and pay inequality on workers' job satisfaction," Working Papers 542602, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    3. repec:lan:wpaper:3619 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:lan:wpaper:3621 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:lan:wpaper:3727 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ariel C. Avgar & Niti Pandey & Kiwook Kwon, 2012. "Discretion in Context: A Moderated Mediation Model of the Relationship between Discretion and Turnover Intentions," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 106-128, January.
    7. Paul Osterman, 2000. "Work Reorganization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Effects on Employee Welfare," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 53(2), pages 179-196, January.
    8. Jeffrey B. Arthur, 2011. "Do HR System Characteristics Affect the Frequency of Interpersonal Deviance in Organizations? The Role of Team Autonomy and Internal Labor Market Practices," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 30-56, January.
    9. Douglas L. Kruse & Richard B. Freeman & Joseph R. Blasi, 2010. "Do Workers Gain by Sharing? Employee Outcomes under Employee Ownership, Profit Sharing, and Broad-Based Stock Options," NBER Chapters, in: Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-based Stock Options, pages 257-289, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. John Godard, 2001. "High Performance and the Transformation of Work? The Implications of Alternative Work Practices for the Experience and Outcomes of Work," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(4), pages 776-805, July.
    11. Sprenger, Wim, 2011. "Trade Unions and innovation - innovative unions? Experiences from selected EU member states," Rostocker Beiträge zur Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologie 7, Universität Rostock, Seniorprofessur für Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologie.
    12. Lin, Meizhen & Wu, Xiaoyi & Ling, Qian, 2017. "Assessing the effectiveness of empowerment on service quality: A multi-level study of Chinese tourism firms," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 411-425.
    13. Paula B. Voos & Haejin Kim, 2001. "High performance work systems in the U.S. context," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 7(3), pages 422-440, August.
    14. Markey, R. & Pomfret, S., 2001. "Managers' Perceptions of Cooperation and Joint Decision-Making with Trade Unions: A Regional Case Study in the Illawarra (Australia)," Economics Working Papers wp01-13, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    15. Peter Cappelli & David Neumark, 2001. "Do “High-Performance†Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(4), pages 737-775, July.
    16. Patel, Charmi & Budhwar, Pawan & Varma, Arup, 2012. "Overall justice, work group identification and work outcomes: Test of moderated mediation process," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 213-222.
    17. Jed Devaro & Fidan Ana Kurtulus, 2011. "What types of organizations benefit from teams, and how do they benefit?," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2011-16, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    18. Heywood, John S. & Jirjahn, Uwe & Wei, Xiangdong, 2008. "Teamwork, monitoring and absence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(3-4), pages 676-690, December.
    19. Bill Harley, 2001. "Team Membership and the Experience of Work in Britain: An Analysis of the WERS98 Data," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 15(4), pages 721-742, December.
    20. Martin Krzywdzinski, 2017. "Accounting for Cross-Country Differences in Employee Involvement Practices: Comparative Case Studies in Germany, Brazil and China," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 321-346, June.
    21. Richard Anderson-Connolly & Leon Grunberg & Edward S. Greenberg & Sarah Moore, 2002. "Is Lean Mean?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(3), pages 389-413, September.
    22. Yeongjoon Yoon & Sukanya Sengupta, 2019. "The effect of employee share ownership on employee commitment and turnover: comparing the cases in Britain and South Korea and the role of the economy," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5-6), pages 486-516, November.
    23. Michelle Brown & Lori A. Geddes & John S. Heywood, 2007. "The Determinants of Employee-Involvement Schemes: Private Sector Australian Evidence," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 28(2), pages 259-291, May.
    24. Diogo Gonçalves-Candeias & Maria José Chambel & Vânia Sofia Carvalho, 2021. "Is Stress in Contact Centers Inevitable?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:23:y:2002:i:4:p:491-528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.