IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rvofce/ofce_0751-6614_1997_num_62_1_1465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Réalité et déboires de l'espace conjoncturel européen : une régulation sans croissance ?

Author

Listed:
  • Jacky Fayolle
  • Paul-Emmanuel Micolet

Abstract

[eng] The history of the industrial capitalism shows the formation and the disintegration of economic spaces, whose national short term cycles are correlated strongly. The strengthening of such an space in Europe is enhanced by recent studies. In this paper, the precise study of the correlation between French and German cycles, over the last thirty years, shows it is not a completely new phenomenon. These cycles are synchronised strongly, because they follow from common internal and external demand impulses. But, until the beginning of the nineties, the correlation of the internal private demands, not the one of the public demands, contributes to that synchronisation. The present fiscal convergence can constitute an important change, if it induces the persistent synchronisation of the public impulses. The correlation between the European and American cycles has a double nature. It mixes impulse and crowding out effects of the American growth over the European economy. The crowding out effects are caused by the competition between American and European exportations and by the financial asymmetry between the two zones. They produce frequent cyclical lags between United States and Europe. The regionalization of the European economic activity is based on strong commercial interdependences, which surpass the internal divergence forces (as the exchange rates fluctuations). But it does not mean an increased European independence of the monetary and financial American influences. This double reality induces questions about the conditions of an common European short term policy, whose objective could be the collective access of the European countries to their potential growth path. [fre] L'histoire du capitalisme industriel met en évidence la formation et la dissolution d'espaces conjoncturels rassemblant un ensemble de pays aux cycles fortement corrélés. A cet égard, le renforcement, depuis une quinzaine d'années, d'un espace conjoncturel européen est relevé par une série d'études récentes. L'étude précise de la corrélation des cycles français et allemand et de ses modalités, sur les trois dernières décennies, montre cependant qu'il ne s'agit pas d'un phénomène entièrement neuf. Les cycles de la France et de l'Allemagne sont fortement synchronisés, depuis déjà assez longtemps, parce qu'ils répondent à des impulsions communes de demande interne et externe. C'est cependant la corrélation des demandes internes privées, et non celle des demandes publiques, qui a contribué, jusqu'au début des années quatre-vingt-dix, à cette synchronisation. En ce sens, la convergence budgétaire européenne en cours constitue un changement sensible, si elle doit engendrer une mise en phase durable des impulsions publiques. La relation entre le cycle européen et le cycle américain est de nature duale. Elle fait jouer les effets d'entraînement exercés par l'économie américaine mais aussi des effets d'éviction. Ceux-ci passent par la compétition entre les exportations américaines et européennes et par l'impact des asymétries financières sur les demandes privées de chacune des deux zones. Ces effets d'éviction sont à la source des déphasages cycliques fréquents entre les Etats-Unis et l'Europe. Cette caractérisation comparée des cycles américain et européen sur longue période amène à relever l'ambivalence de la désynchronisation persistante et croissante des mouvements conjoncturels de ces deux zones depuis une quinzaine d'années. L'espace européen gagne en consistance et, en son sein, les facteurs d'homogénéisation des conjonctures, qu'il s'agisse de la densité des interdépendances commerciales ou de la convergence des politiques économiques, l'emporte rapidement sur les forces de différenciation, qui sont notamment passées par les mouvements de change durant ces dernières années. En même temps, cette régionalisation de la conjoncture européenne ne signifie pas une indépendance accrue vis-à- vis des influences monétaires et financières en provenance des Etats-Unis. L'Europe subit l'impact persistant et négatif des modalités, notamment des mouvements de change et d'intérêt, grâce auxquelles les Etats-Unis assurent la régulation conjoncturelle de leur croissance. Ce double aspect incite à s'interroger sur les conditions ď émergence d'une véritable régulation conjoncturelle à l'échelle européenne, qui facilite l'accès collectif des pays européens à leur sentier de croissance potentielle.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacky Fayolle & Paul-Emmanuel Micolet, 1997. "Réalité et déboires de l'espace conjoncturel européen : une régulation sans croissance ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 62(1), pages 5-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1997_num_62_1_1465
    DOI: 10.3406/ofce.1997.1465
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.1997.1465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ofce.1997.1465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ofce_0751-6614_1997_num_62_1_1465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ofce.1997.1465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Equipe MIMOSA & Henri Delessy & Henri Sterdyniak & Bruno Coquet & Philippine Cour & Hervé Le Bihan & Frédéric Lerais & Frédéric Busson & John Baude & Bernard Châtelain & Murielle Fiole, 1996. "La nouvelle version de MIMOSA, modèle de l'économie mondiale," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 58(1), pages 103-155.
    2. C Bean, 1992. "Economic and Monetary Union," CEP Discussion Papers dp0086, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Peter Brandner & Klaus Neusser, 1992. "Business cycles in open economies: Stylized facts for Austria and Germany," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 128(1), pages 67-87, March.
    4. Artis, Michael J & Kontolemis, Zenon G & Osborn, Denise, 1995. "Classical Business Cycles for G7 and European Countries," CEPR Discussion Papers 1137, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Bayoumi, Tamim & Eichengreen, Barry, 1992. "Shocking Aspects of Monetary Unification," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt791143kp, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    6. Artis, Michael J & Zhang, W, 1997. "International Business Cycles and the ERM: Is There a European Business Cycle?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Jean-Paul Fitoussi, 1996. "Anatomie de la croissance molle," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 59(1), pages 213-244.
    8. Tamim Bayoumi & Barry Eichengreen, 1992. "Shocking Aspects of European Monetary Unification," NBER Working Papers 3949, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/9361 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Jean-Paul Fitoussi & Jacques Le Cacheux, 1989. "Une théorie des années quatre-vingt," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 29(1), pages 117-160.
    11. Pierre-Alain Muet, 1995. "Union monétaire et fédéralisme," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 55(1), pages 151-170.
    12. Jonathan Rubin & Niels Thygesen, 1996. "Monetary Union and the Outsiders - A Cointegration/ Codependence Analysis of Business Cycles in Europe," Discussion Papers 96-08, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    13. Claude Giorno & Pete Richardson & Deborah Roseveare & Paul van den Noord, 1995. "Estimating Potential Output, Output Gaps and Structural Budget Balances," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 152, OECD Publishing.
    14. Charles R. Bean, 1992. "Economic and Monetary Union in Europe," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(4), pages 31-52, Fall.
    15. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5650 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Christodoulakis, Nikos & Dimelis, Sophia & Kollintzas, Tryphon, 1993. "Comparisons of Business Cycles in Greece and the EC: Idiosyncracies and Regularities," CEPR Discussion Papers 809, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5953 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Philippe Martin, 1996. "Faut-il aller contre le cycle ?," La Lettre du CEPII, CEPII research center, issue 149.
    19. Cohen, Daniel & Wyplosz, Charles, 1989. "The European Monetary Union: An Agnostic Evaluation," CEPR Discussion Papers 306, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Jacky Fayolle & Paul-Emmanuel Micolet, 1997. "Cycles internationaux : éléments pour une problématique appliquée," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 62(1), pages 109-150.
    21. Oskar Morgenstern, 1959. "International Financial Transactions and Business Cycles," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number morg59-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacky Fayolle & Paul-Emmanuel Micolet, 1997. "Cycles internationaux : éléments pour une problématique appliquée," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 62(1), pages 109-150.
    2. Paul-Emmanuel Micolet, 1998. "Positionnement conjoncturel du Royaume-Uni et UEM," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 66(1), pages 127-169.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacky Fayolle & Paul-Emmanuel Micolet, 1997. "Cycles internationaux : éléments pour une problématique appliquée," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 62(1), pages 109-150.
    2. Paul-Emmanuel Micolet, 1998. "Positionnement conjoncturel du Royaume-Uni et UEM," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 66(1), pages 127-169.
    3. Horvath, Julius, 2003. "Optimum currency area theory: A selective review," BOFIT Discussion Papers 15/2003, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    4. Selahattin Dibooglu & Julius Horvath, 1997. "Optimum Currency Areas And European Monetary Unification," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(1), pages 37-49, January.
    5. Juan Luís Ollero & Raul Ramos & Jordi Suriñach-Caralt, 2001. "Macroeconomic implications of EMU at the regional level," ERSA conference papers ersa01p146, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Joseph A. Whitt, 1995. "European Monetary Union: evidence from structural VARs," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 95-1, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    7. Schor, Armand-Denis, 2000. "La théorie des zones monétaires optimales : l’optimum, le praticable, le crédible et le réel," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 76(4), pages 545-576, décembre.
    8. Franz Pauer, 1996. "Will Asymmetric Shocks Pose a Serious Problem in EMU?," Working Papers 23, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    9. Volker Clausen & Bernd Hayo, 2002. "Makroökonomische Implikationen der Mitgliedschaft Deutschlands in der Europäischen Währungsunion," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 71(3), pages 339-353.
    10. Buscher, Herbert S., 1999. "Business Cycles in EU Member States," ZEW Discussion Papers 99-16, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    11. repec:onb:oenbwp:y::i:23:b:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ghartey, E.E., 2008. "Is the Caribbean Community an Optimum Currency Area?," Estudios Economicos de Desarrollo Internacional, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 8(1), pages 5-36.
    13. Domenico Giannone & Michele Lenza & Lucrezia Reichlin, 2010. "Business Cycles in the Euro Area," NBER Chapters, in: Europe and the Euro, pages 141-167, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. M.J. Artis, 2003. "Reflections on the optimal currency area (OCA) criteria in the light of EMU," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 297-307.
    15. Bruneau, C. & De Bandt, O., 1999. "Fiscal Policy in the Transition to Monetary Union: a Structural VAR Model," Working papers 60, Banque de France.
    16. Jacky Fayolle, 1999. "D'une mondialisation à l'autre," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 69(1), pages 161-206.
    17. Gilles Saint Paul & Samuel Bentolila, 2000. "Will EMU increase eurosclerosis?," Economics Working Papers 449, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    18. Raúl Ramos & Miquel Clar & Jordi Suriñach, 1999. "Specialisation in Europe and Asymmetric Shocks: Potential Risks of EMU," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Manfred M. Fischer & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Spatial Dynamics of European Integration, chapter 4, pages 63-93, Springer.
    19. Frankel, Jeffrey A. & Rose, Andrew K., 1996. "Economic Structure and the Decision to Adopt a Common Currency," Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers 233436, University of California-Berkeley, Department of Economics.
    20. Frankel, Jeffrey A & Rose, Andrew K, 1998. "The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(449), pages 1009-1025, July.
    21. Dominique Hachette & Fernando Ossa & Francisco Rosende, 1996. "Aspectos Monetarios y Macroeconómicos de la Integración," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 33(98), pages 153-183.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1997_num_62_1_1465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ofce .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.