IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rvofce/ofce_0751-6614_1992_num_39_1_1263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retraites et évolutions démographiques en France. Première partie : Le long terme

Author

Listed:
  • Sandrine Cazes
  • Thierry Chauveau
  • Jacques Le Cacheux
  • Rahim Loufir

Abstract

[fre] Face au vieillissement probable de la population française au cours des prochaines décennies, les perspectives de financement de l'actuel régime public de retraite par répartition sont relativement sombres. Si la tendance à la stagnation de la population française se confirme, des choix devront être faits entre le maintien du système actuel, qui implique une augmentation — à terme assez substantielle — des taux de cotisations, et une modification de ses règles. . Cet article propose un cadre d'évaluation des conséquences économiques à long terme de différents scénarios : il s'agit d'un modèle d'équilibre général calculable à générations imbriquées de l'économie française, qui, à partir d'hypothèses sur les préférences des ménages et sur l'environnement économique et institutionnel dans lequel ils prennent leurs décisions, permet de déterminer leurs comportements individuels d'offre de travail, de dépenses de consommation, d'épargne et d'accumulation au cours de leur cycle de vie. Les principales grandeurs macroéconomiques sont alors déduites par agrégation exacte des comportements individuels. Grâce à la détermination endogène de l'ensemble des décisions des ménages et des entreprises, un tel modèle permet de tenir compte des conséquences sur les choix d'activité, de consommation et d'épargne, de modifications institutionnelles telles que des réformes du régime de retraite. . Après avoir présenté les résultats de quelques variantes démographiques, qui confirment que le système actuel ne serait véritablement viable à long terme que si la croissance de la population était positive, nous analysons les effets micro- et macroéconomiques de long terme de diverses options envisageables en matière de retraite. Tant la comparaison des conséquences macroéconomiques que l'analyse en termes de bien-être — individuel et social — nous incitent à conclure que, parmi les mesures étudiées et à supposer que la stagnation de la population française se confirme, le recul de l'âge légal de départ à la retraite apparaît comme nettement plus favorable que des alternatives telles que la réduction des prestations ou l'instauration d'un système pur de capitalisation. [eng] Due to the likely ageing of the French population over the coming decades, the future financing of the current public, « pay-as-you-go » pension system is quite worrisome. If the currently foreseen stagnation of the population materializes, a choice will have to be made between keeping the current system, which, in the long run, implies a rather substantial increment in social contribution rates, and altering the benefits. This article offers a framework for evaluating the long-run economic consequences of the various possible scenarios : it presents an overlap- ping-generations, general equilibrium model of the French economy in which individual choices concerning labour supply, consumption, saving and wealth accumulation are endogeneously derived from assumptions on tastes, technologies and institutions. Macroeconomic magnitudes are then simply obtained through exact aggregation of individual behaviours. Because all households' and firms' decisions are endogeneously determined in such a framework, the model is well suited for analysing the consequences on households' labour supply, consumption and saving behaviours, of such institutional changes as reforms in public pension schemes. . After the description of the model itself, we present the results of a few demographic variants, which clearly show that the current system would be sustainable in the long run only if population growth is positive. The micro- and macroeconomic effects of various possible options for the future public pension scheme in France are then discussed. The comparison of macroeconomic outcomes and the — individual and social — welfare analysis suggest that, if the forecast of a stagnating French population comes true, raising the legal retirement age would clearly dominate other alternatives such as curtailing benefits or switching to a pure capitalization scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandrine Cazes & Thierry Chauveau & Jacques Le Cacheux & Rahim Loufir, 1992. "Retraites et évolutions démographiques en France. Première partie : Le long terme," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 39(1), pages 93-149.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1992_num_39_1_1263
    DOI: 10.3406/ofce.1992.1263
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.1992.1263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ofce.1992.1263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ofce_0751-6614_1992_num_39_1_1263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ofce.1992.1263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul A. Samuelson, 1958. "An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66, pages 467-467.
    2. Franco Modigliani, 1986. "Cycle de vie, épargne individuelle et richesse des nations," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 1(2), pages 16-54.
    3. R. Glenn Hubbard & Kenneth L. Judd, 1986. "Liquidity Constraints, Fiscal Policy, and Consumption," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 17(1), pages 1-60.
    4. Françoise Charpin, 1988. "Le modèle de cycle de vie, une approche numérique," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 25(1), pages 173-198.
    5. Jean-Yves Fournier, 1986. "Les carrières des fonctionnaires : une approche par le « GVT »," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 191(1), pages 45-60.
    6. Laurence Bloch & Michel Glaude, 1983. "Une approche du coût de l'enfant," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 155(1), pages 51-67.
    7. Henri Sterdyniak & Gerard Cornilleau, 1991. "Assurer les retraites," Post-Print hal-03428491, HAL.
    8. Stigler, George J & Becker, Gary S, 1977. "De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 76-90, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2091 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jacques Le Cacheux & Vincent Touzé, 2002. "Les modèles d'équilibre général calculable à générations imbriquées. Enjeux, méthodes et résultats," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 80(1), pages 87-113.
    3. Vincent Touzé, 2009. "Incidence fiscale des retraites par répartition. Une exploration analytique," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(4), pages 103-124.
    4. Vincent Touzé, 2009. "Incidence fiscale des retraites par répartition," Post-Print hal-03460023, HAL.
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09hai241102 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thierry Chauveau & Rahim Loufir, 1993. "Retraites et évolutions démographiques en France - Seconde partie : la transition," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 47(1), pages 117-160.
    2. Thierry Chauveau & Rahim Loufir, 1994. "Allongement de l'espérance de vie, croissance et retraites," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 50(1), pages 29-64.
    3. Dirk Krueger, 2006. "Public Insurance against Idiosyncratic and Aggregate Risk: The Case of Social Security and Progressive Income Taxation," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo, vol. 52(4), pages 587-620, December.
    4. Françoise Charpin, 1988. "Le modèle de cycle de vie, une approche numérique," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 25(1), pages 173-198.
    5. Nicolas Drouhin, 2001. "Lifetime Uncertainty and Time Preference," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 145-172, December.
    6. Alessio Emanuele Biondo & Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2020. "Choices on museum attendance: An agent‐based approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 882-897, November.
    7. Trung X. Hoang & Nga V. T. Le, 2021. "Natural disasters and risk aversion: Evidence from Vietnam," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(3), pages 211-229, August.
    8. Hwang, Chiun-Lin, 1989. "Optimal monetary policy in an open macroeconomic model with rational expectation," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010197, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Janet Hua Jiang & Enchuan Shao, 2014. "Understanding the Cash Demand Puzzle," Staff Working Papers 14-22, Bank of Canada.
    10. Hillebrand, Marten & Kikuchi, Tomoo, 2015. "A mechanism for booms and busts in housing prices," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 204-217.
    11. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime To, 2019. "Quelles règles de pilotage pour un système de retraite à rendement défini?," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02514738, HAL.
    12. Daisuke Ikeda & Toan Phan & Timothy Sablik, 2020. "Asset Bubbles and Global Imbalances," Richmond Fed Economic Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 20, pages 1-4, January.
    13. Thunström, Linda & Nordström, Jonas & Shogren, Jason F., 2015. "Certainty and overconfidence in future preferences for food," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 101-113.
    14. de Mendonça, Helder Ferreira & Tiberto, Bruno Pires, 2014. "Public debt and social security: Level of formality matters," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 490-507.
    15. Robert Kaestner, 1995. "The Effects of Cocaine and Marijuana Use on Marriage and Marital Stability," NBER Working Papers 5038, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Li, Shiyu & Lin, Shuanglin, 2011. "Is there any gain from social security privatization?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 278-289, September.
    17. Patricia Apps & Ray Rees, 2007. "Population Ageing, Taxation, pensions and Health Costs," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 10(2), pages 79-97.
    18. Carl Christian von Weizsäcker, 2011. "Homo Oeconomicus Adaptivus – Die Logik des Handelns bei veränderlichen Präferenzen," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2011_10, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    19. Jacques Le Cacheux & Vincent Touzé, 2002. "Les modèles d'équilibre général calculable à générations imbriquées. Enjeux, méthodes et résultats," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 80(1), pages 87-113.
    20. Jagjit S. Chadha, 2018. "Of Gold and Paper Money," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 86(S1), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1992_num_39_1_1263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ofce .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.