IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlaop/v2008y2008i2id58p70-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fragmentation versus Unity of the World Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel Neumann

Abstract

The article deals with fragmentation and unity prospects of the world economy with respect to the role of its main centres (Europe/EU, East Asia, America). From the view point of the process of the running multilateral liberalisation the world economy was formed as relatively unified at first after World War II. However, regionalisation intensified in 1990s and since then stronger fragmentation has become a natural element of the world economy globalization as "new regionalism". Theoretically, the fragmentation process can be explained by Viner's customs union theory as well as later by the regionalism domino theory developed by many authors. Concerning the role of individual centres, despite its present differentiation, Europe (EU), is more unified than the other regions. However, with its deep integration concept and trade diversion stemming from a high intratrade rate, Europe contributes rather to the world fragmentation. East Asia represented by ASEAN keeps still sticking to the shallow integration, co-operating with non-member partners. The group represents best the open regionalism characteristics, currently not strengthening the world economy fragmentation. The American area remains still relatively fragmented despite the U.S. effort to create a wide integration zone similar to NAFTA. The American region appears more open than Europe with respect to the intratrade share, nevertheless, its integration structure is still in progress; and its impact on the solution of the world economy fragmentation-unity dilemma is uncertain.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel Neumann, 2008. "Fragmentation versus Unity of the World Economy," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 2008(2), pages 70-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaop:v:2008:y:2008:i:2:id:58:p:70-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.vse.cz/polek/download.php?jnl=aop&pdf=58.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://www.vse.cz/aop/58
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burfisher, Mary E. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2004. "Regionalism," MTID discussion papers 65, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Baldwin, Richard, 1993. "A Domino Theory of Regionalism," CEPR Discussion Papers 857, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Yongzheng Yang & Alvin Hilaire, 2003. "The United States and the New Regionalism/ Bilateralism," IMF Working Papers 03/206, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Xinshen Diao & Eugenio Díaz-Bonilla & Sherman Robinson, 2003. "Scenarios for Trade Integration in the Americas," Economie Internationale, CEPII research center, issue 94-95, pages 33-51.
    5. Sapir, Andre, 2001. "Domino effects in Western European regional trade, 1960-1992," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 377-388, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    multilateralism; regionalism; world economy; fragmentation; unity; regional trade agreements; intratrade;

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaop:v:2008:y:2008:i:2:id:58:p:70-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frantisek Sokolovsky). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.