IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351876.html

Growth, instability and future outlook of livestock population and products in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Abu Hayat Md Saiful Islam
  • Md Mahfuzul Hasan
  • Mohammad Saiful Islam
  • Masayuki Sato

Abstract

In the changing agri-food system, livestock play an important role, providing not only protein and micronutrients but also organic fertilizers, employment, and women’s empowerment in many developing countries including Bangladesh. Reliable forecasting of livestock populations and products is necessary to inform policy decisions related to food security, supply, demand, and imports and exports, as well as self-sufficiency goals and associated inter- and intra-regional trade opportunities. However, robust long-term projections for livestock systems remain limited in the literature. Therefore, this study employs growth modeling and time series forecasting techniques to analyze historical trends (1961–2020) in livestock populations and products, assess their instability using the Cuddy Della instability index, and generate forecasts up to 2041 using the Box-Jenkins Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) framework. Model selection was based on standard statistical criteria, including goodness of fit measures and diagnostic checks of residual behaviour. The forecasting framework assumes that historical patterns and structural relations observed in the data remain stable over the projection period and that no major structural breaks or unforeseen external shocks significantly alter underlying dynamics. The results reveal that the cubic growth model best captures long-term trends in livestock populations and products, with generally low growth rates and low instability across categories. The highest annual growth rate was observed for chicken (3.71%) among the livestock population and eggs (7.40%) among the livestock products. The analysis further indicates a persistent deficit in milk and meat production, while egg production shows comparatively stronger performance. Forecasts generated using the selected ARIMA models were ARIMA (1,2,1), ARIMA (0,2,1), and ARIMA (1,2,5), for milk, meat, and egg, respectively, suggest a continuing upward trend in production up to 2041, consistent with historical patterns and growth model estimates. Under model assumptions, milk, meat, and egg projected production levels in 2041 are estimated at yearly 4,449,394, 9,77,042, and 1,289,863 metric tons (MT), respectively, reflecting substantial increases of around 24.34%, 35.24%, and 61.51% over 2020. Although these estimates represent point forecasts and are subject to various assumptions, findings of this study will serve as invaluable evidence-based insights for livestock sector stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, academia, livestock producers, and the feed industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Abu Hayat Md Saiful Islam & Md Mahfuzul Hasan & Mohammad Saiful Islam & Masayuki Sato, 2026. "Growth, instability and future outlook of livestock population and products in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-1, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351876
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351876
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351876&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wallace E. Tyner, 2010. "The integration of energy and agricultural markets," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(s1), pages 193-201, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Colman, 2010. "Agriculture's terms of trade: issues and implications," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(s1), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Cheng, Sheng & Cao, Yan, 2019. "On the relation between global food and crude oil prices: An empirical investigation in a nonlinear framework," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 422-432.
    3. Ladislav Kristoufek & Karel Janda & David Zilberman, 2013. "Regime-dependent topological properties of biofuels networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 86(2), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Tule, Moses K. & Salisu, Afees A. & Chiemeke, Charles C., 2019. "Can agricultural commodity prices predict Nigeria's inflation?," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    5. Aynur Pala, 2013. "Structural Breaks, Cointegration, and Causality by VECM Analysis of Crude Oil and Food Price," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 3(3), pages 238-246.
    6. Taheripour, Farzad & Baumes, Harry & Tyner, Wally Taheripour, Farzad, 2019. "Impacts of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard on Commodity and Food Prices," Conference papers 333127, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Dalheimer, Bernhard & Herwartz, Helmut & Lange, Alexander, 2021. "The threat of oil market turmoils to food price stability in Sub-Saharan Africa," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Saghaian, Sayed & Nemati, Mehdi & Walters, Cory & Chen, Bo, . "Asymmetric Price Volatility Transmission between U.S. Biofuel, Corn, and Oil Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(01).
    9. Konstantinos N. Baltas & Robert Mann & Nicholaos C. Baltas, 2024. "The COVID-19 Pandemic and Unsustainable PPE Materials: A Correlation and Causality Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(6), pages 1651-1671, June.
    10. Francis Declerck & Jean-Pierre Indjehagopian & Frédéric Lantz, 2020. "Dynamics of biofuel prices on the European market: Impact of the EU environmental policy on the resources markets," Working Papers hal-02487491, HAL.
    11. Liu, Feng & Zhang, Chuanguo & Tang, Mengying, 2021. "The impacts of oil price shocks and jumps on China's nonferrous metal markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Colin A. Carter & Gordon C. Rausser & Aaron Smith, 2017. "Commodity Storage and the Market Effects of Biofuel Policies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1027-1055.
    13. Cao, Yan & Cheng, Sheng & Li, Xinran, 2024. "Co-movements between heterogeneous crude oil and food markets: Does temperature change really matter?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    14. Barbaglia, Luca & Wilms, Ines & Croux, Christophe, 2016. "Commodity dynamics: A sparse multi-class approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 62-72.
    15. Paolo Libenzio Brignoli & Alessandro Varacca & Cornelis Gardebroek & Paolo Sckokai, 2024. "Machine learning to predict grains futures prices," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(3), pages 479-497, May.
    16. Kristoufek, Ladislav & Janda, Karel & Zilberman, David, 2012. "Correlations between biofuels and related commodities before and during the food crisis: A taxonomy perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1380-1391.
    17. Yang, Baochen & Pu, Yingjian & Su, Yunpeng, 2020. "The financialization of Chinese commodity markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    18. O'Rear, Eric G. & Sarica, Kemal & Tyner, Wallace E., 2015. "Analysis of impacts of alternative policies aimed at increasing US energy independence and reducing GHG emissions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 121-133.
    19. Rico, J.A.P. & Sauer, I.L., 2015. "A review of Brazilian biodiesel experiences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 513-529.
    20. Shawkat Hammoudeh & Soodabeh Sarafrazi & Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2011. "The Dynamics of Energy-Grain Prices with Open Interest," Working Papers in Economics 11/24, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.