IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0336724.html

The orchestrating role of platform enterprises in digital inclusion: A network game perspective from industrial clusters

Author

Listed:
  • Dingteng Wang
  • Ningning Li
  • Guoan Liang
  • Shengming Li

Abstract

The digital transformation of industrial clusters, while enhancing productivity, has exacerbated the corporate digital divide, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Digital inclusion, which aims to bridge this divide, exhibits public-good attributes and positive externalities, yet its co-construction is often hindered by the “Olson’s dilemma” arising from the conflict between individual and collective rationality. Platform enterprises, occupying the “bridging point” of structural holes within clusters, are posited to act as opinion leaders capable of orchestrating ecosystem co-creation. Through a theoretical simulation approach, there employs a “small-world + opinion leader” complex network framework to model the evolutionary dynamics of digital inclusion ecosystem co-construction. Integrating a public goods game model with a Fermi learning algorithm enhanced by a random surfer mechanism, we simulate strategic interactions among cluster firms under controlled parameter conditions. Monte Carlo simulations reveal a distinct threshold effect under simulated conditions: cooperation emerges sustainably only when the investment return coefficient surpasses the critical value defined by the number of game participants. Furthermore, the platform’s connection ratio and strategic commitment emerge as pivotal factors; maintaining an investment strategy significantly promotes cooperation, whereas free-riding by the platform exerts a strong negative demonstration effect. While traditional platform governance tools like rewards and punishments can mitigate cooperation decay, they cannot reverse collective free-riding trends in our model. Crucially, a binding collective agreement, featuring pre-commitment of costs and redistribution of unused funds, emerges as the most effective mechanism for resolving the cooperation dilemma within the simulation. These theoretically derived findings offer insights for policymakers, platform enterprises, and SMEs in fostering collaborative and inclusive digital ecosystems within industrial clusters, though empirical validation remains necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Dingteng Wang & Ningning Li & Guoan Liang & Shengming Li, 2026. "The orchestrating role of platform enterprises in digital inclusion: A network game perspective from industrial clusters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336724
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336724
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336724&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0336724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siobhan O'Mahony & Rebecca Karp, 2022. "From proprietary to collective governance: How do platform participation strategies evolve?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 530-562, March.
    2. Claudia U. Ciborra, 1996. "The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 103-118, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Kretschmer & Aija Leiponen & Melissa Schilling & Gurneeta Vasudeva, 2022. "Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 405-424, March.
    2. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    3. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Philipp Kernstock & Constantin Harms & Andreas Hein & Helmut Krcmar, 2025. "Establishing and governing data ecosystems at the crossroads of centralization and decentralization," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Witell, Lars & Gebauer, Heiko & Jaakkola, Elina & Hammedi, Wafa & Patricio, Lia & Perks, Helen, 2017. "A bricolage perspective on service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 290-298.
    6. Chibuike Mbanefo & Sara Grobbelaar, 2025. "Evolutionary dynamics of digital platform ecosystems in healthcare: A case study of the discovery ecosystem in South Africa," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Krzysztof Bartczak & Stanisław Łobejko, 2022. "The Implementation Environment for a Digital Technology Platform of Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Klaus E. Meyer & Jiatao Li & Keith D. Brouthers & Ruey-Jer ‘‘Bryan’’ Jean, 2023. "International business in the digital age: Global strategies in a world of national institutions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(4), pages 577-598, June.
    9. Angela Rocha & Vítor Corado Simões & Renato Cotta Mello & Jorge Carneiro, 2017. "From global start-ups to the borderless firm: Why and how to build a worldwide value system," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 121-144, June.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/15200 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Joe Cox & Paul Crosby & Jordi McKenzie, 2023. "Don’t Look Back? Backward Compatibility in the Video Gaming Industry," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 387-404, September.
    12. Cozzolino, Alessio & Geiger, Susi, 2024. "Ecosystem disruption and regulatory positioning: Entry strategies of digital health startup orchestrators and complementors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    13. Tao Li & Jianqiang Luo & Kaitong Liang & Chaonan Yi & Lei Ma, 2023. "Synergy of Patent and Open-Source-Driven Sustainable Climate Governance under Green AI: A Case Study of TinyML," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Jialei Li & Wei Wang, 2024. "From Renting Economy to Sharing Economy: How Do Bike-Sharing Platforms Grow in the Digital Era?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8097-8117, June.
    15. Maryam Alavi & Dorothy E. Leidner, 2001. "Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning—A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, March.
    16. Power, Michael, 2022. "Theorizing the economy of traces: from audit society to surveillance capitalism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112167, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8820 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Hadi Karimikia & Narges Safari & Harminder Singh, 2020. "Being useful: How information systems professionals influence the use of information systems in enterprises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 429-453, April.
    19. Dietmar Offenhuber, 2019. "The platform and the bricoleur—Improvisation and smart city initiatives in Indonesia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1565-1580, October.
    20. Mélodie Cartel & Eva Boxenbaum & Franck Aggeri, 2014. "Policy making as bricolage: the role of platforms in institutional innovation," Post-Print hal-01089462, HAL.
    21. Liudmila Zavolokina & Andreas Hein & Arthur Carvalho & Gerhard Schwabe & Helmut Krcmar, 2024. "Preface to the special issue on “Enterprise and organizational applications of distributed ledger technologies”," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-5, December.
    22. Youngjin Yoo & Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Ann Majchrzak, 2012. "Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1398-1408, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.