IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0297120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human error risk prioritization in crane operations based on CPT and ICWGT

Author

Listed:
  • Aihua Li

Abstract

Human error plays a significant role in crane safety. To increase the accuracy and rationality of human error risk prioritization for crane operations, this study proposes a risk prioritization model for human errors in crane operations based on the cumulative prospect theory (CPT) and the improved combination weighting model of game theory (ICWGT). The ICWGT integrates the risk-factor weights obtained via subjective and objective methods. Trapezoidal fuzzy numbers are used to describe experts’ uncertainty information. Then, the CPT is applied to handle the assessment of experts’ risk attitudes in the decision process. The human error risk ranking of crane operations is obtained according to the overall prospect values calculated using the CPT. A case study of human error in overhead crane operations was conducted, and sensitivity and comparison analyses confirmed the feasibility of the proposed model. The proposed ranking mechanism for human error risk priority in crane operations is helpful for crane risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Aihua Li, 2024. "Human error risk prioritization in crane operations based on CPT and ICWGT," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297120
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297120
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297120&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0297120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    2. Jing Zhang & Dong Yang & Qiang Li & Benjamin Lev & Yanfang Ma, 2020. "Research on Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on the Rough DEMATEL and FVIKOR Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Wu, Yunna & Ke, Yiming & Xu, Chuanbo & Li, Lingwenying, 2019. "An integrated decision-making model for sustainable photovoltaic module supplier selection based on combined weight and cumulative prospect theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1235-1251.
    4. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Jianghong & Guo, Ping & Xu, Guangyi & Xu, Gangyan & Ning, Yu, 2024. "An integrated decision framework for resilient sustainable waste electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station site selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    2. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    4. Jian-Peng Chang & Heng-Xin Ren & Luis Martínez & Witold Pedrycz & Zhen-Song Chen, 2024. "Requirement-driven supplier selection: a multi-criteria QFD-based approach under epistemic and stochastic uncertainties," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1079-1128, November.
    5. Jianguo Di & Wenge Liu & Jiaqi Sun & Dianfeng Zhang, 2025. "Market Potential Evaluation of Photovoltaic Technologies in the Context of Future Architectural Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    7. Guo, Hongye & Chen, Qixin & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2022. "Bidding behaviors of GENCOs under bounded rationality with renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    8. Yin, Yu & Liu, Jicheng, 2022. "Risk assessment of photovoltaic - Energy storage utilization project based on improved Cloud-TODIM in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    9. Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo & Huiru Zhao, 2018. "Selecting the Optimal Micro-Grid Planning Program Using a Novel Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Based on Grey Cumulative Prospect Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Nana Liu & Zeshui Xu & Yue He & Xiao-Jun Zeng, 2021. "An inverse prospect theory-based algorithm in extended incomplete additive probabilistic linguistic preference relation environment and its application in financial products selection," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 397-428, September.
    11. Songrui Li & Yitang Hu, 2022. "A Multi-Criteria Framework to Evaluate the Sustainability of Renewable Energy: A 2-Tuple Linguistic Grey Relation Model from the Perspective of the Prospect Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo, 2024. "Risks assessment on island micro-grids construction schemes employing a fuzzy-MCDM framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 13185-13216, May.
    13. Fangming Cheng & Zhuo Li & Chang Su & Jiao Qu & Meng Jiang & Hanzhang Ge & Linan Wang & Ziyan Gou, 2023. "Optimization of Emergency Alternatives for Hydrogen Leakage and Explosion Accidents Based on Improved VIKOR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Wu, Yunna & Zhang, Ting & Gao, Rui & Wu, Chenghao, 2021. "Portfolio planning of renewable energy with energy storage technologies for different applications from electricity grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    15. Zhao, Haoran & Guo, Sen & Zhao, Huiru, 2019. "Comprehensive assessment for battery energy storage systems based on fuzzy-MCDM considering risk preferences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 450-461.
    16. Yang, Zaoli & Li, Qin & Charles, Vincent & Xu, Bing & Gupta, Shivam, 2023. "Supporting personalized new energy vehicle purchase decision-making: Customer reviews and product recommendation platform," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    17. Wu, Yunna & Ke, Yiming & Xu, Chuanbo & Li, Lingwenying, 2019. "An integrated decision-making model for sustainable photovoltaic module supplier selection based on combined weight and cumulative prospect theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1235-1251.
    18. Oliver Linton & Esfandiar Maasoumi & Yoon-Jae Wang, 2002. "Consistent testing for stochastic dominance: a subsampling approach," CeMMAP working papers 03/02, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    19. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    20. Heiko Karle & Georg Kirchsteiger & Martin Peitz, 2015. "Loss Aversion and Consumption Choice: Theory and Experimental Evidence," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 101-120, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.