IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7631-d1282497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Emergency Alternatives for Hydrogen Leakage and Explosion Accidents Based on Improved VIKOR

Author

Listed:
  • Fangming Cheng

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Public Safety and Fire Rescue, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Zhuo Li

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Public Safety and Fire Rescue, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Chang Su

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Public Safety and Fire Rescue, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Jiao Qu

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Meng Jiang

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Public Safety and Fire Rescue, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Hanzhang Ge

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Public Safety and Fire Rescue, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Linan Wang

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Public Safety and Fire Rescue, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Ziyan Gou

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Xi’an Key Laboratory of Urban Public Safety and Fire Rescue, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

Hydrogen leakage and explosion accidents have obvious dangers, ambiguity of accident information, and urgency of decision-making time. These characteristics bring challenges to the optimization of emergency alternatives for such accidents. Effective emergency decision making is crucial to mitigating the consequences of accidents and minimizing losses and can provide a vital reference for emergency management in the field of hydrogen energy. An improved VIKOR emergency alternatives optimization method is proposed based on the combination of hesitant triangular fuzzy set (HTFS) and the cumulative prospect theory (CPT), termed the HTFS-CPT-VIKOR method. This method adopts the hesitant triangular fuzzy number to represent the decision information on the alternatives under the influence of multi-attributes, constructs alternatives evaluation indicators, and solves the indicator weights by using the deviation method. Based on CPT, positive and negative ideal points were used as reference points to construct the prospect matrix, which then utilized the VIKOR method to optimize the emergency alternatives for hydrogen leakage and explosion accidents. Taking an accident at a hydrogen refueling station as an example, the effectiveness and rationality of the HTFS-CPT-VIKOR method were verified by comparing with the existing three methods and conducting parameter sensitivity analysis. Research results show that the HTFS-CPT-VIKOR method effectively captures the limited psychological behavior characteristics of decision makers and enhances their ability to identify, filter, and judge ambiguous information, making the decision-making alternatives more in line with the actual environment, which provided strong support for the optimization of emergency alternatives for hydrogen leakage and explosion accidents.

Suggested Citation

  • Fangming Cheng & Zhuo Li & Chang Su & Jiao Qu & Meng Jiang & Hanzhang Ge & Linan Wang & Ziyan Gou, 2023. "Optimization of Emergency Alternatives for Hydrogen Leakage and Explosion Accidents Based on Improved VIKOR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7631-:d:1282497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7631/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7631/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    2. Venko Beschkov & Evgeniy Ganev, 2023. "Perspectives on the Development of Technologies for Hydrogen as a Carrier of Sustainable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    5. Singh, Pushpendra & Meena, Nand K. & Yang, Jin & Vega-Fuentes, Eduardo & Bishnoi, Shree Krishna, 2020. "Multi-criteria decision making monarch butterfly optimization for optimal distributed energy resources mix in distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Horst Zank, 2001. "Cumulative Prospect Theory for Parametric and Multiattribute Utilities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 67-81, February.
    7. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulrich Schmidt & Horst Zank, 2012. "A genuine foundation for prospect theory," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 97-113, October.
    2. Lei Wang & Qing Liu & Tongle Yin, 2018. "Decision-making of investment in navigation safety improving schemes with application of cumulative prospect theory," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 710-724, December.
    3. Jianguo Di & Wenge Liu & Jiaqi Sun & Dianfeng Zhang, 2025. "Market Potential Evaluation of Photovoltaic Technologies in the Context of Future Architectural Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    5. Schade, Christian & Schroeder, Andreas & Krause, Kai Oliver, 2010. "Coordination after gains and losses: Is prospect theory’s value function predictive for games?," Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers 59524, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    6. Gebhard Geiger, 2012. "Multi-attribute non-expected utility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 263-292, July.
    7. Schmidt, Ulrich & Zank, Horst, 2010. "Endogenizing prospect theory's reference point," Kiel Working Papers 1611, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Nana Liu & Zeshui Xu & Yue He & Xiao-Jun Zeng, 2021. "An inverse prospect theory-based algorithm in extended incomplete additive probabilistic linguistic preference relation environment and its application in financial products selection," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 397-428, September.
    9. Horst Zank, 2007. "On the Paradigm of Loss Aversion," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0710, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    10. Schmidt, Ulrich & Zank, Horst, 2009. "A simple model of cumulative prospect theory," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3-4), pages 308-319, March.
    11. Ulrich Schmidt & Horst Zank, 2008. "Risk Aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 208-216, January.
    12. Han Bleichrodt & Ulrich Schmidt & Horst Zank, 2009. "Additive Utility in Prospect Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 863-873, May.
    13. Schmidt, Ulrich & Zank, Horst, 2010. "Endogenous Prospect Theory," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 37536, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran & Xindong Peng & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Abbas Mardani, 2020. "A Group Decision Framework for Renewable Energy Source Selection under Interval-Valued Probabilistic linguistic Term Set," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    15. Dogucan Mazicioglu & Jason R. W. Merrick, 2018. "Behavioral Modeling of Adversaries with Multiple Objectives in Counterterrorism," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 962-977, May.
    16. Jason R. W. Merrick & Philip Leclerc, 2016. "Modeling Adversaries in Counterterrorism Decisions Using Prospect Theory," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 681-693, April.
    17. Zhaoyu Cao & Yucheng Zou & Xu Zhao & Kairong Hong & Yanwei Zhang, 2021. "Multidimensional Fairness Equilibrium Evaluation of Urban Housing Expropriation Compensation Based on VIKOR," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Horst Zank, 2010. "On probabilities and loss aversion," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 243-261, March.
    19. Yang, Zaoli & Li, Qin & Charles, Vincent & Xu, Bing & Gupta, Shivam, 2023. "Supporting personalized new energy vehicle purchase decision-making: Customer reviews and product recommendation platform," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    20. Jian-Peng Chang & Heng-Xin Ren & Luis Martínez & Witold Pedrycz & Zhen-Song Chen, 2024. "Requirement-driven supplier selection: a multi-criteria QFD-based approach under epistemic and stochastic uncertainties," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1079-1128, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7631-:d:1282497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.