IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0272737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The devil is not as black as he is painted? On the positive relationship between food industry conspiracy beliefs and conscious food choices

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Marchlewska
  • Dagmara Szczepańska
  • Adam Karakula
  • Zuzanna Molenda
  • Marta Rogoza
  • Dominika Maison

Abstract

Previous research found that conspiracy beliefs were usually activated when individuals faced different types of psychological threats and that they led mainly to maladaptive individual and societal outcomes. In this research, we assumed that potential harmfulness of conspiracy beliefs may depend on the context, and we focused on the link between food industry conspiracy beliefs and conscious food choices. We hypothesized that food industry conspiracy beliefs may allow for a constructive attempt to protect oneself against real or imagined enemies (i.e., food industry companies) by conscious food choices (e.g., paying attention to how much the food products are processed). We tested this hypothesis among Polish participants (Study 1; N = 608; cross-sectional and Study 2; N = 790; experimental). Study 1 confirmed that context-specific conspiracy beliefs (but not general notions of conspiracy) are associated with adaptive consumer behaviors. Study 2 showed that inducing feelings of threat related to the possibility of purchasing food contaminated by a harmful bacteria (vs. control condition) increased food industry conspiracy beliefs, which were further positively linked to conscious food choices. We discuss the role of threat and conspiracy beliefs in adaptive consumer behaviors related to food choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Marchlewska & Dagmara Szczepańska & Adam Karakula & Zuzanna Molenda & Marta Rogoza & Dominika Maison, 2022. "The devil is not as black as he is painted? On the positive relationship between food industry conspiracy beliefs and conscious food choices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0272737
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0272737
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0272737&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0272737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Charry & N. Demoulin, 2012. "Behavioural evidence for the effectiveness of threat appeals in the promotion of healthy food to children," Post-Print hal-00785675, HAL.
    2. Roberts, James A., 1996. "Will the real socially responsible consumer please step forward?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 79-83.
    3. Moser, Andrea K., 2016. "Consumers' purchasing decisions regarding environmentally friendly products: An empirical analysis of German consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 389-397.
    4. Carstairs, C., 2015. "Debating water fluoridation before Dr. Strangelove," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(8), pages 1559-1569.
    5. William Black & Barry J. Babin, 2019. "Multivariate Data Analysis: Its Approach, Evolution, and Impact," Springer Books, in: Barry J. Babin & Marko Sarstedt (ed.), The Great Facilitator, pages 121-130, Springer.
    6. Grunert, Klaus G. & Hieke, Sophie & Wills, Josephine, 2014. "Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 177-189.
    7. Brécard, Dorothée & Hlaimi, Boubaker & Lucas, Sterenn & Perraudeau, Yves & Salladarré, Frédéric, 2009. "Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 115-125, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yokessa, Maïmouna & Marette, Stéphan, 2019. "A Review of Eco-labels and their Economic Impact," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 119-163, April.
    2. De Francesco, Edi & Perito, Maria Angela & Bozzolan, Irene & Stefani, Gianluca & Cei, Leonardo Cei, 2017. "Consumers’ preferences for private health-related and public environmentally friendly food attributes: New insights from an ABR approach," 2017 Sixth AIEAA Conference, June 15-16, Piacenza, Italy 261258, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    3. Brunner, Florentine & Kurz, Verena & Bryngelsson, David & Hedenus, Fredrik, 2018. "Carbon Label at a University Restaurant – Label Implementation and Evaluation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 658-667.
    4. Orset, Caroline & Monnier, Marco, 2020. "How do lobbies and NGOs try to influence dietary behaviour?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(01), July.
    5. Frank Wijen & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2019. "Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02071504, HAL.
    6. Bogliacino, Francesco & Charris, Rafael & Codagnone, Cristiano & Folkvord, Frans & Gaskell, George & Gómez, Camilo & Liva, Giovanni & Montealegre, Felipe, 2023. "Less is more: Information overload in the labelling of fish and aquaculture products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Jean-Francois Dewals & Sterenn Lucas & Fabienne Daures & Pascal Floc’h & Kilian Heutte, 2024. "Assessment of consumer preferences in the context of multiple labels: the case of fishery and aquaculture products," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 299-325, November.
    8. Onozaka, Yuko & Honkanen, Pirjo & Altintzoglou, Themistoklis, 2023. "Sustainability, perceived quality and country of origin of farmed salmon: Impact on consumer choices in the USA, France and Japan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Defrancesco, Edi & Perito, Maria Angela & Bozzolan, Irene & Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca, 2017. "Consumers’ Preferences for Health Related and Environmental Friendly Food Attributes of Italian Pasta," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276913, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    10. Malin Jonell & Beatrice Crona & Kelsey Brown & Patrik Rönnbäck & Max Troell, 2016. "Eco-Labeled Seafood: Determinants for (Blue) Green Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Cheung, Millissa F.Y. & To, W.M., 2019. "An extended model of value-attitude-behavior to explain Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 145-153.
    12. Bartłomiej Kabaja & Magdalena Wojnarowska & Maria Chiara Cesarani & Erica Varese, 2022. "Recognizability of Ecolabels on E-Commerce Websites: The Case for Younger Consumers in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Defrancesco, Edi & Perito, Maria Angela & Bozzolan, Irene & Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca, 2017. "Consumers’ Preferences for Health Related and Environmental Friendly Food Attributes of Italian Pasta," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    14. Davide Menozzi & Thong Tien Nguyen & Giovanni Sogari & Dimitar Taskov & Sterenn Lucas & José Luis Santiago Castro-Rial & Cristina Mora, 2020. "Consumers’ Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries," Post-Print hal-02935812, HAL.
    15. Jeremy De Valck & John Rolfe & Darshana Rajapaksa & Megan Star, 2022. "Consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for improved environmental standards: insights from cane sugar in the Great Barrier Reef region," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(3), pages 505-531, July.
    16. Bronnmann, Julia & Asche, Frank, 2017. "Sustainable Seafood From Aquaculture and Wild Fisheries: Insights From a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 113-119.
    17. Roheim, Cathy A. & Zhang, Dengjun, 2018. "Sustainability certification and product substitutability: Evidence from the seafood market," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 92-100.
    18. Pablo Díaz-Siefer & Francisco E. Fontúrbel & Maite Berasaluce & Carlos Huenchuleo & Rattan Lal & Pedro Mondaca & Juan L. Celis-Diez, 2024. "The market–society–policy nexus in sustainable agriculture," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 29981-30000, December.
    19. Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Damian Kocot, 2022. "Determinants of Purchase Behavior of Young E-Consumers of Eco-Friendly Products to Further Sustainable Consumption Based on Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Climate-Friendly Food in European Countries," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276930, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0272737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.