Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218805
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Baron, David P. & Ferejohn, John A., 1989. "Bargaining in Legislatures," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 83(4), pages 1181-1206, December.
- Thomson, William, 2013.
"A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 157-168.
- William Thomson, 2006. "A Characterization of a Family of Rules for the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims," RCER Working Papers 530, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
- Linda Babcock & George Loewenstein, 1997. "Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 109-126, Winter.
- William Thomson, 2015. "For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 60(3), pages 495-520, November.
- Kalai, Ehud, 1977.
"Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(7), pages 1623-1630, October.
- Ehud Kalai, 1977. "Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons," Discussion Papers 179, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
- Simon Gächter & Arno Riedl, 2005.
"Moral Property Rights in Bargaining with Infeasible Claims,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 249-263, February.
- Simon Gächter & Arno Riedl, 2003. "Moral Property Rights in Bargaining with Infeasible Claims," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-055/1, Tinbergen Institute.
- Carmen Herrero & Juan Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2010.
"On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(1), pages 145-179, January.
- Carmen Herrero & Juan Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2009. "On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(3), pages 517-519, September.
- Herrero & C., 2004. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 166, Econometric Society.
- HERRERO, Carmen & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & PONTI, Giovanni, 2006. "On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006062, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- Carmen Herrero & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2009. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Working Papers 09.10, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
- HERRERO, Carmen & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & PONTI, Giovanni, 2010. "On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2264, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- Carmen Herrero & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2009. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Working Papers 2009-5, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
- Thomson, William, 2015.
"Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: An update,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-59.
- William Thomson, 2013. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update," RCER Working Papers 578, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
- Emin Karagözoğlu & Arno Riedl, 2015. "Performance Information, Production Uncertainty, and Subjective Entitlements in Bargaining," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(11), pages 2611-2626, November.
- Loewenstein, George & Issacharoff, Samuel & Camerer, Colin & Babcock, Linda, 1993. "Self-Serving Assessments of Fairness and Pretrial Bargaining," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(1), pages 135-159, January.
- Babcock, Linda, et al, 1995. "Biased Judgments of Fairness in Bargaining," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(5), pages 1337-1343, December.
- William Thomson, 2015. "For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules," RCER Working Papers 592, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
- Wulf Gaertner & Lars Schwettmann, 2017.
"Burden sharing in deficit countries: a questionnaire-experimental investigation,"
SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 113-144, June.
- Gaertner, Wulf & Schwettmann, Lars, 2017. "Burden sharing in deficit countries: a questionnaire-experimental investigation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83367, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Thomson, William, 2003. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 249-297, July.
- Roth, Alvin E & Murnighan, J Keith & Schoumaker, Francoise, 1988. "The Deadline Effect in Bargaining: Some Experimental Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(4), pages 806-823, September.
- M. Angeles de Frutos, 1999. "Coalitional manipulations in a bankruptcy problem," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 4(3), pages 255-272.
- Herrero, Carmen & Villar, Antonio, 2001.
"The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 307-328, November.
- Antonio Villar Notario & Carmen Herrero Blanco, 2000. "The Three Musketeers: Four Classical Solutions To Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2000-23, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
- Pfingsten, Andreas, 1991. "Surplus-sharing methods," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 287-301, June.
- Aumann, Robert J. & Maschler, Michael, 1985. "Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 195-213, August.
- Kroll, Eike B. & Morgenstern, Ralf & Neumann, Thomas & Schosser, Stephan & Vogt, Bodo, 2014. "Bargaining power does not matter when sharing losses – Experimental evidence of equal split in the Nash bargaining game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 261-272.
- Kristof Bosmans & Erik Schokkaert, 2009.
"Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(4), pages 533-557, November.
- BOSMANS, Kristof & SCHOKKAERT, Erik, 2007. "Equality preference in the claims problem: A questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2007030, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- BOSMANS, Kristof & SCHOKKAERT, Erik, 2009. "Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2166, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- Roger Berger & Heiko Rauhut & Sandra Prade & Dirk Helbing, "undated". "Bargaining over time in ultimatum game experiments," Working Papers CCSS-10-002, ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design.
- Wulf Gaertner & Lars Schwettmann & Yongsheng Xu, 2017. "An Experimental Game of Loss Sharing," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2017-01, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Kim, Duk Gyoo & Lim, Wooyoung, 2024.
"Multilateral bargaining over the division of losses,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 59-76.
- Duk Gyoo Kim & Wooyoung Lim, 2019. "Multilateral Bargaining over the Division of Losses," CESifo Working Paper Series 8011, CESifo.
- Gaertner, Wulf & Xu, Yongsheng, 2020.
"Loss sharing: Characterizing a new class of rules,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 37-40.
- Gaertner, Wulf & Xu, Yongsheng, 2020. "Loss sharing: characterizing a new class of rules," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115467, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & M. Carmen Marco-Gil & Juan-Francisco Sánchez-García, 2022. "New empirical insights into conflicting claims problems," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 709-738, December.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Thomson, William, 2015.
"Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: An update,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-59.
- William Thomson, 2013. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update," RCER Working Papers 578, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
- Wulf Gaertner & Lars Schwettmann, 2017.
"Burden sharing in deficit countries: a questionnaire-experimental investigation,"
SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 113-144, June.
- Gaertner, Wulf & Schwettmann, Lars, 2017. "Burden sharing in deficit countries: a questionnaire-experimental investigation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83367, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Simon Gächter & Arno Riedl, 2006.
"Dividing Justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 27(3), pages 571-594, December.
- Simon Gächter & Arno Riedl, 2004. "Dividing justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-044/1, Tinbergen Institute.
- Emin Karagözoğlu, 2014.
"A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 299-318, June.
- Karagozoglu, E., 2008. "A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogeneous estate," Research Memorandum 031, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
- Karagozoglu, E., 2010. "A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate," Research Memorandum 027, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
- Anita Gantner & Kristian Horn & Rudolf Kerschbamer, 2013. "Fair Division in Unanimity Bargaining with Subjective Claims," Working Papers 2013-31, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
- Thomson, William, 2003. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 249-297, July.
- Alexander W. Cappelen & Roland Iwan Luttens & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2019. "Fairness in Bankruptcies: An Experimental Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2832-2841, June.
- Emin Karagözoglu & Martin G. Kocher, 2015.
"Bargaining under Time Pressure,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
5685, CESifo.
- Karagözoğlu, Emin & Kocher, Martin G., 2015. "Bargaining under Time Pressure," Discussion Papers in Economics 26642, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- Flores-Szwagrzak, Karol, 2015. "Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 36-55.
- Gaertner, Wulf & Xu, Yongsheng, 2020.
"Loss sharing: Characterizing a new class of rules,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 37-40.
- Gaertner, Wulf & Xu, Yongsheng, 2020. "Loss sharing: characterizing a new class of rules," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115467, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & M. Carmen Marco-Gil & Juan-Francisco Sánchez-García, 2022. "New empirical insights into conflicting claims problems," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 709-738, December.
- Simon G�chter & Arno Riedl, "undated".
"Moral Property Rights in Bargaining,"
IEW - Working Papers
113, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Simon Gaechter & Arno Riedl, 2002. "Moral Property Rights in Bargaining," CESifo Working Paper Series 697, CESifo.
- Gächter, Simon & Riedl, Arno, 2017. "Moral property rights in bargaining," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 330, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
- Juarez, Ruben & Ko, Chiu Yu & Xue, Jingyi, 2018.
"Sharing sequential values in a network,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 734-779.
- Juarez, Ruben & Ko, Chiu Yu & Xue, Jingyi, 2016. "Sharing Sequential Values in a Network," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 3-2017, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
- Jingyi Xue, 2018. "Fair division with uncertain needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 105-136, June.
- Embrey, Matthew & Hyndman, Kyle & Riedl, Arno, 2021.
"Bargaining with a residual claimant: An experimental study,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 335-354.
- Embrey, M.S. & Hyndman, K. & Riedl, A.M., 2014. "Bargaining with a residual claimant: An experimental study," Research Memorandum 039, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
- Matthew Embrey & Kyle Hyndmanz & Arno Riedl, 2020. "Bargaining with a Residual Claimant: An Experimental Study," Working Paper Series 1520, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
- Matthew Embrey & Kyle Hyndman & Arno Riedl, 2019. "Bargaining with a Residual Claimant: An Experimental Study," Working Paper Series 0419, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
- Matthew Embrey & Kyle Hyndman & Arno Riedl, 2014. "Bargaining with a Residual Claimant: An Experimental Study," CESifo Working Paper Series 5087, CESifo.
- José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & António Osório & Josep E. Peris, 2015.
"From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach,"
Games, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, March.
- Giménez-Gómez, José-Manuel & Osorio, Antonio & Peris, Josep Enric, 2013. "From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach," QM&ET Working Papers 13-2, University of Alicante, D. Quantitative Methods and Economic Theory.
- Giménez-Gómez, José Manuel & Osório Costa, Antonio Miguel & Peris, Josep E., 2013. "From bargaining solutions to claims rules: a proportional approach," Working Papers 2072/212193, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
- Alfredo Valencia-Toledo & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2020.
"Reassignment-proof rules for land rental problems,"
International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(1), pages 173-193, March.
- Valencia-Toledo, Alfredo & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2018. "Reassignment-proof rules for land rental problems," MPRA Paper 92133, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "On the Difficulty of Budget Allocation in Claims Problems with Indivisible Items and Prices," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1133-1159, October.
- Carmen Herrero & Juan Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2010.
"On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(1), pages 145-179, January.
- Carmen Herrero & Juan Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2009. "On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(3), pages 517-519, September.
- Herrero & C., 2004. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 166, Econometric Society.
- Carmen Herrero & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2009. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Working Papers 09.10, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
- HERRERO, Carmen & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & PONTI, Giovanni, 2010. "On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2264, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- HERRERO, Carmen & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & PONTI, Giovanni, 2006. "On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006062, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- Carmen Herrero & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2009. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Working Papers 2009-5, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
- Andrea Gallice, 2022. "Bankruptcy Problems with Self-Serving Biased Reference Points," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 683 JEL Classification: D, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.