IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v9y2022i1d10.1057_s41599-022-01077-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agro-sphere determinants of green branding: eco-consumption, loyalty, and price premium

Author

Listed:
  • Yuriy Danko

    (Sumy National Agrarian University)

  • Olena Nifatova

    (Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design)

Abstract

This research is devoted to the determinants of green branding in the agro-sphere. The existence of competition between regular and green brands in the agricultural sector has necessitated the determination of the degree of influence of green branding on the formation of consumer loyalty in order to understand the effectiveness and feasibility of such practices among agricultural producers. Previous research in the study of green branding has not focused on the factors studied influencing the level of consumption of organic products or the factors influencing the size of the price premium for green brands. In this study, the influence of green branding on the loyalty of consumers of the eco-market was determined on the basis of a comparison of integrated indicators of satisfaction and importance of the regular brand and green brands by an expert survey of 250 respondents in five supermarkets in Kyiv (Ukraine). In the example comparing the coefficients of consumer loyalty of eggs of the eco-brand and the regular brand, it was found that the rate of consumer loyalty to the eco-brand exceeded the rate of consumer loyalty to the regular brand by 3%. It was established that the size of the price premium of a green brand is determined by such factors as consumer loyalty, availability of organic certificates, costs of green advertising, additional cost of organic products, average profitability of the industry, and average income of consumers. Based on cluster and discriminant analysis, green brands were divided into three levels of price premium: “high”, “medium”, and “low.” Discriminant equations for each cluster according to the level of price premium were constructed. Such equations make it possible to assign a new object of analysis (a new brand) to a certain classificational price category. The current study proves the feasibility and economic and statistical validity of the impact of green branding on consumer loyalty in the agricultural sector. The study has significant implications for brand management by providing empirical evidence that can improve brand managers’ strategic decisions in determining the level of price premium.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuriy Danko & Olena Nifatova, 2022. "Agro-sphere determinants of green branding: eco-consumption, loyalty, and price premium," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01077-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-022-01077-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-022-01077-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-022-01077-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily H. Morgan & Michelle M. Severs & Karla L. Hanson & Jared McGuirt & Florence Becot & Weiwei Wang & Jane Kolodinsky & Marilyn Sitaker & Stephanie B. Jilcott Pitts & Alice Ammerman & Rebecca A. Seg, 2018. "Gaining and Maintaining a Competitive Edge: Evidence from CSA Members and Farmers on Local Food Marketing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Ronnie Cheung & Aris Y.C. Lam & Mei Mei Lau, 2015. "Drivers of green product adoption: the role of green perceived value, green trust and perceived quality," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 232-245, June.
    3. Masahisa Fujita & Nobuaki Hamaguchi, 2019. "Brand Agriculture And Economic Geography: When Are Highly Differentiated Products Sustainable In The Remote Periphery?," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 169-202, November.
    4. Yu-Shan Chen & Shu-Tzu Hung & Ting-Yu Wang & A-Fen Huang & Yen-Wen Liao, 2017. "The Influence of Excessive Product Packaging on Green Brand Attachment: The Mediation Roles of Green Brand Attitude and Green Brand Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Aleksandar Grubor & Nikola Milicevic & Nenad Djokic, 2018. "Serbian Organic Food Consumer Research and Bioeconomy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Ricci, Elena Claire & Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2018. "Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 54-65.
    7. Eva M. Murgado-Armenteros & María Gutierrez-Salcedo & Francisco José Torres-Ruiz, 2020. "The Concern about Biodiversity as a Criterion for the Classification of the Sustainable Consumer: A Cross-Cultural Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Mirela Ionela Aceleanu, 2016. "Sustainability and Competitiveness of Romanian Farms through Organic Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Nicole Darnall & Hyunjung Ji & Diego A. Vázquez-Brust, 2018. "Third-Party Certification, Sponsorship, and Consumers’ Ecolabel Use," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 953-969, July.
    10. Hans Jørn Juhl & Morten H. J. Fenger & John Thøgersen, 2017. "Will the Consistent Organic Food Consumer Step Forward? An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 519-535.
    11. Amy Quark, 2015. "Agricultural commodity branding in the rise and decline of the US food regime: from product to place-based branding in the global cotton trade, 1955–2012," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(4), pages 777-793, December.
    12. Krittinee Nuttavuthisit & John Thøgersen, 2017. "The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Green Products: The Case of Organic Food," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 323-337, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chao-Chan Wu & Fei-Chun Cheng & Dong-Yu Sheh, 2023. "Exploring the factors affecting the implementation of corporate social responsibility from a strategic perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gorton, Matthew & Tocco, Barbara & Yeh, Ching-Hua & Hartmann, Monika, 2021. "What determines consumers' use of eco-labels? Taking a close look at label trust," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Danilo Bertoni & Daniele Cavicchioli & Franco Donzelli & Giovanni Ferrazzi & Dario G. Frisio & Roberto Pretolani & Elena Claire Ricci & Vera Ventura, 2018. "Recent Contributions of Agricultural Economics Research in the Field of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Tandon, Anushree & Dhir, Amandeep & Kaur, Puneet & Kushwah, Shiksha & Salo, Jari, 2020. "Why do people buy organic food? The moderating role of environmental concerns and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Ana Lanero & José-Luis Vázquez & César Sahelices-Pinto, 2020. "Heuristic Thinking and Credibility of Organic Advertising Claims: The Role of Knowledge and Motivations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Teerapong Pienwisetkaew & Peerapong Wongthahan & Phaninee Naruetharadhol & Sasichakorn Wongsaichia & Chonnipa Vonganunsuntree & Siraphat Padthar & Santi Nee & Ping He & Chavis Ketkaew, 2022. "Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Functional Non-Dairy Milk and Gender-Based Market Segmentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Mario Pagliacci & Adriana Manolica & Teodora Roman & Gabriela Boldureanu, 2019. "The Consumers of Green Products. The Case of Romanian Moldavia Counties," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(S13), pages 830-830, November.
    7. Haj-Salem, Narjes & Ishaq, Muhammad Ishtiaq & Raza, Ali, 2022. "How anticipated pride and guilt influence green consumption in the Middle East: The moderating role of environmental consciousness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. D'Souza, Clare & Apaolaza, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick & Brouwer, Anne Renée & Nguyen, Ninh, 2021. "Consumer acceptance of irradiated food and information disclosure – A retail imperative," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Lelia Voinea & Diana Maria Vrânceanu & Alina Filip & Dorin Vicențiu Popescu & Teodor Mihai Negrea & Răzvan Dina, 2019. "Research on Food Behavior in Romania from the Perspective of Supporting Healthy Eating Habits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Ginder, Whitney & Byun, Sang-Eun, 2022. "To trust or not to trust? The interplay between labor-related CSR claim type and prior CSR reputation of apparel retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Xiaodong Zhu & Rongrong Gu & Bingbing Wu & Shunsuke Managi, 2017. "Does Hazy Weather Influence Earnings Management of Heavy-Polluting Enterprises? A Chinese Empirical Study from the Perspective of Negative Social Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Basu, Shubhabrata & Pereira, Vijay & Sinha, Paresha & Malik, Ashish & Moovendhan, V., 2022. "Esoteric governance mechanism and collective brand equity creation in confederated organizations: Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 217-230.
    15. Charalampia N. Anastasiou & Kiriaki M. Keramitsoglou & Nikos Kalogeras & Maria I. Tsagkaraki & Ioanna Kalatzi & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis, 2017. "Can the “Euro-Leaf” Logo Affect Consumers’ Willingness-To-Buy and Willingness-To-Pay for Organic Food and Attract Consumers’ Preferences? An Empirical Study in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    16. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    17. Yi He & Qianqian Xu & Da Zhao, 2020. "Impacts of the BOPS Option on Sustainable Retailing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Janvier Kini & Nicky Pouw & Joyeeta Gupta, 2020. "Organic vegetables demand in urban area using a count outcome model: case study of Burkina Faso," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Dante I. Leyva-de la Hiz & J. Alberto Aragon-Correa & Andrew G. Earle, 2022. "Innovating for Good in Opportunistic Contexts: The Case for Firms’ Environmental Divergence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 705-721, April.
    20. Chiara Mazzocchi & Guido Sali, 2022. "Supporting mountain agriculture through “mountain product” label: a choice experiment approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 701-723, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01077-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.