IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i3p245-d65210.html

Sustainability and Competitiveness of Romanian Farms through Organic Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Mirela Ionela Aceleanu

    (Department of Economics and Economic Policy, Faculty of Theoretical and Applied Economics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romana Square, No.6, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Currently, the development of any sector involves respecting the principles of sustainability, which means economic, social and environmental development. Moreover, organic farming is a very important field for ensuring sustainable development. Romania has great potential for the development of organic agriculture, especially due to the large number of available farmland and reduced use of fertilizers and other chemicals. However, the development of organic farming in Romania is in an early stage, due to the numerous problems that Romanian agriculture is still facing. Concern for the environment should be reflected at the level of production processes and consumption. As market demand influences and stimulates production, we can ask the question to what extent stimulating the consumption of organic products through green marketing can boost organic agriculture development and competitiveness of Romanian farms. Using several methods of research, such as analysis, synthesis, comparison, statistical methods and by calling on studies, reports and data series on organic farming in the EU and Romania, this paper highlights Romania's position in terms of the level of development of organic agriculture and recommends several ways to improve the outcomes obtained by Romania in the field. Moreover, based on regression equations, the trend of convergence of Romanian organic agriculture development in relation to the EU countries is analysed. The paper demonstrates that one of the measures that can be taken by Romanian farms is green marketing strategy development that can stimulate both consumption and production of organic products. Therefore, with increasing interest in the development of organic agriculture in Romania, green marketing can play an increasingly important role in promoting the benefits of consuming organic products, thus contributing to business development of organic products as well as to the development of Romanian agriculture. Promoting organic agriculture through the use of green marketing techniques is useful for improving human, environmental and economic health, in the context of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirela Ionela Aceleanu, 2016. "Sustainability and Competitiveness of Romanian Farms through Organic Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:245-:d:65210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clinton Beckford & Donovan Campbell & David Barker, 2011. "Sustainable Food Production Systems and Food Security: Economic and Environmental Imperatives in Yam Cultivation in Trelawny, Jamaica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Victor Danciu, 2008. "The Organic Products in the Green Marketing Laboratory," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 1(1(518)), pages 11-20, January.
    3. Luanne Lohr & Timothy Park, 2010. "Local Selling Decisions and the Technical Efficiency of Organic Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Lelia Voinea & Dorin Vicentiu Popescu & Mihai Teodor Negrea, 2015. "Good Practices in Educating and Informing the New Generation of Consumers on Organic Foodstuffs," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 488-488, February.
    5. Diana Mihaela Pociovălișteanu & Isabel Novo-Corti & Mirela Ionela Aceleanu & Andreea Claudia Șerban & Eugenia Grecu, 2015. "Employment Policies for a Green Economy at the European Union Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Nicolae Al. Pop & Anca-Daniela Vl?doi, 2009. "The marketer-a complex specialist, a man of concept, decision and action," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(25), pages 9-20, February.
    7. Drago Cvijanović & Branko Mihailović & Miroslav Čavlin & Gordana Čavlin, 2015. "Impact of Marketing Consulting on Performances of Agrarian Clusters in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pop Nicolae Alexandru & Mihoc Florin & Fotea Ioan Stefan, 2010. "Relationship Marketing Research Tailored To Support Sales Management. Case Study: An International Express Logistics Company In Romania," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 755-760, July.
    2. Kristina Ročkutė & Inga Minelgaitė & Ligita Zailskaitė-Jakštė & Robertas Damaševičius, 2018. "Brand Awareness in the Context of Mistrust: The Case Study of an Employment Agency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Ana Pellín Carcelén & Nuria Cuevas Monzonís & Ana Rodríguez Martín & Vicente Gabarda Méndez, 2021. "Promotion of Environmental Education in the Spanish Compulsory Education Curriculum. A Normative Analysis and Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Yuhan Jing & Mingzhao Hu & Lingdi Zhao, 2023. "The effect of heterogeneous environmental regulations on the employment skill structure: The system-GMM approach and mediation model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-33, August.
    5. Stefan Bojnec & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag & Carmen Valentina Radulescu, 2019. "Locally Produced Organic Food: Consumer Preferences," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 209-209, February.
    6. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Sara Russo-Garrido & Nicolas Merveille, 2020. "Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Mihai Stoica, 2021. "Development of the Organic Food Market in Romania during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Perspective on the Supply Chain," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 9(2), pages 113-120, December.
    8. Pop Nicolae Al. & Ott Cristina-Maria & Simion Daniela & Zottu-Z Monica, 2018. "Marketing of luxury events. Case study on the tenth Congress of anti-aging medicine, Bucharest, 2018," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Paradigm, vol. 12(1), pages 772-781, May.
    9. Bowen, Alex & Kuralbayeva, Karlygash & Tipoe, Eileen L., 2018. "Characterising green employment: The impacts of ‘greening’ on workforce composition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 263-275.
    10. Natalia Vukovic & Vladimir Pobedinsky & Sergey Mityagin & Andrei Drozhzhin & Zhanna Mingaleva, 2019. "A Study on Green Economy Indicators and Modeling: Russian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    11. Alina Ligia Dumitrescu, 2023. "The Progress of the EU Labor Market Based on the Green Economy," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 11(1), pages 7-15, May.
    12. Branko Mihailovic, Drago Cvijanovic, Zoran Simonovic, 2015. "Role Of Business Ethics In Management Of Human Resources," Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues 2015-01, „Ekonomika“ Society of Economists, Niš (Serbia).
    13. Nada Denona Bogovic & Zvonimira Sverko Grdic, 2020. "Transitioning to a Green Economy—Possible Effects on the Croatian Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Krisztina Melinda DOBAY, 2023. "Transition To Sustainable Value Chains And Agri-Food Systems Through Collective Actions – Evidence From Organic Beekeeping," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 79-94.
    15. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:60 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:209 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Cristian Barra & Nazzareno Ruggiero, 2019. "Are Green Energies Employment Friendly? Empirical Evidence for Some OECD Countries over the 1985–2013 Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Riccardo Testa & Anna Maria di Trapani & Filippo Sgroi & Salvatore Tudisca, 2014. "Economic Sustainability of Italian Greenhouse Cherry Tomato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Gheorghe Epuran & Claudia-Ioana Ciobanu & Adrian V. Horodnic & Gheorghe Epuran & Claudia-Ioana Ciobanu & Adrian V. Horodnic, 2019. "Green Jobs Creation – Main Element in the Implementation of Bioeconomic Mechanisms," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-60, February.
    20. Hua Tao & Min Tao & Rong Wang, 2022. "Do Education Human Capital and Environmental Regulation Drive the Growth Efficiency of the Green Economy in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    21. Dilworth, Lowell & Brown, Kesi & Asemota, Helen, 2013. "Bioavailability of Essential Minerals from Staples Commonly Consumed in the Tropics," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(2).
    22. Ionica Oncioiu & Ioana Duca & Mirela Anca Postole & Georgiana Camelia Georgescu (Crețan) & Rodica Gherghina & Robert-Adrian Grecu, 2021. "Transforming the COVID-19 Threat into an Opportunity: The Pandemic as a Stage to the Sustainable Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:245-:d:65210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.