IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v60y2009i5d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A linear programming formulation of a semi-Markov model to design pig facilities

Author

Listed:
  • L M Plà

    (University of Lleida)

  • J Faulín

    (Public University of Navarre)

  • S V Rodríguez

    (University of Lleida)

Abstract

Housing facilities design represents the main strategic decision in pig farms. This paper introduces a linear programming formulation of a semi-Markov process to approach the facilities design. Thus, the Linear Programming formulation determines the optimum replacement policy and provides the equilibrium distribution of the herd along pig facilities. Then, the calculation of the associated needs of room for each sow facility is derived from sow herd distribution at equilibrium. Results show the flexibility of the model for designing pig facilities and computational advantages in the solving procedure compared to previous proposals. Furthermore, the robustness of the optimal solution is studied by means of sensitivity analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • L M Plà & J Faulín & S V Rodríguez, 2009. "A linear programming formulation of a semi-Markov model to design pig facilities," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(5), pages 619-625, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:60:y:2009:i:5:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602599
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602599
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Paul Chavas & James Kliebenstein & Thomas D. Crenshaw, 1985. "Modeling Dynamic Agricultural Production Response: The Case of Swine Production," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(3), pages 636-646.
    2. Huirne, R. B. M. & Dijkhuizen, A. A. & van Beek, P. & Hendriks, Th. H. B., 1993. "Stochastic dynamic programming to support sow replacement decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 161-171, June.
    3. Jalvingh, A. W. & Dijkhuizen, A. A. & van Arendonk, J. A. M., 1992. "Dynamic probabilistic modelling of reproduction and replacement management in sow herds. General aspects and model description," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 133-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Rodríguez & Lluis Plà & Javier Faulin, 2014. "New opportunities in operations research to improve pork supply chain efficiency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 5-23, August.
    2. Ludvík Friebel & Jana Friebelová & Naděžda Kernerová, 2016. "Stochastic Analysis of Profitability of the Pig Breeding Process," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(1), pages 255-264.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Rodríguez & Lluis Plà & Javier Faulin, 2014. "New opportunities in operations research to improve pork supply chain efficiency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 5-23, August.
    2. Niemi, Jarkko K., 2012. "Designing coordination contracts to support efficient flow-scheduling in pork chain," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 125208, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Pla, L. M. & Pomar, C. & Pomar, J., 2003. "A Markov decision sow model representing the productive lifespan of herd sows," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 253-272, April.
    4. Roemen, J.H.J. & de Klein, J., 1998. "An optimal delivery strategy for porkers with heterogeneity and dependent prices," Other publications TiSEM 4775b203-6880-43c8-b1c7-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Hennessy, David A., 2006. "Feeding and the Equilibrium Feeder Animal Price-Weight Schedule," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Boland, Michael A. & Foster, Kenneth A. & Preckel, Paul V., 1999. "Nutrition And The Economics Of Swine Management," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(1), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Lawrence, John D. & Kaylen, Michael S., 1990. "Risk Management For Livestock Producers: Hedging And Contract Production," Staff Papers 13496, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Mariano J. Gonzalez-Alcorta & Jeffrey H. Dorfman & Gene M. Pesti, 1994. "Maximizing profit in broiler production as prices change: A simple approximation with practical value," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(5), pages 389-399.
    9. Greer, Heather C. & Trapp, James N., 2000. "Impact Of Alternative Grid Pricing Structures On Cattle Marketing Decisions," 2000 Conference, April 17-18 2000, Chicago, Illinois 18926, NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    10. Elisa Gatto & Guido Signorino, 2014. "Crop-diversity and Cereal Production under the CAP Reform: Evidence from Italy," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 35-50.
    11. Kuchler, Fred & McClelland, John, 1989. "Issues Raised by New Agricultural Technologies: Livestock Growth Hormones," Agricultural Economic Reports 308071, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Samantha L. Padilla & Lenis Saweda O. Liverpool‐Tasie & Robert J. Myers, 2021. "The effects of feed and energy costs on broiler farm decisions: A dynamic programming approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(2), pages 249-264, March.
    13. Parsons, Jay R. & Hoag, Dana L. & Koontz, Stephen R., 2001. "Economics Of Variable Swine Growth," 2001 Annual Meeting, July 8-11, 2001, Logan, Utah 36082, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald J. & Kliebenstein, James, 1993. "Impacts of PST on Optimal Production and Marketing Decisions of a Grow-Finish Hog Farm Operation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 166-174, October.
    15. Jeffrey Ohlmann & Philip Jones, 2011. "An integer programming model for optimal pork marketing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 271-287, October.
    16. Webber, C. A. & Graham, J. D. & MacGregor, R. J., 1988. "A Regional Analysis of Direct Government Assistance Programs in Canada and their Impacts on the Beef and Hogs Sectors," Working Papers 244071, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    17. Meyer, Steven Roger, 1987. "The value of near infrared reflectance measurement of feedgrain nutrient composition," ISU General Staff Papers 1987010108000012708, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Eswaramoorthy, K., 1991. "U.S. livestock production and factor demand: a multiproduct dynamic dual approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000010523, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Lengers, Bernd & Britz, Wolfgang, 2012. "The choice of emission indicators in environmental policy design: an analysis of GHG abatement in different dairy farms based on a bio-economic model approach," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 93(2).
    20. Parsons, Jay R. & Hoag, Dana L. & Frasier, W. Marshall & Koontz, Stephen R., 2002. "Variable Growth Impacts On Optimal Market Timing In All-Out Production Systems," 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California 36610, Western Agricultural Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:60:y:2009:i:5:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.