IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/abaman/v23y2024i1d10.1057_s41291-023-00258-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When we unite, not divide: status homophily, group average status, and group performance in the Korean film industry

Author

Listed:
  • Youchung Kwon

    (Cornell University)

  • Bo Kyung Kim

    (Yonsei University)

Abstract

This study examines how status conflicts serve as a mechanism underlying the negative impact of status homophily on group performance. In short-term project groups without well-established local status hierarchies, status homophily among members can lead to status conflicts, thereby diminishing group performance. However, we argue that the intensity of these status conflicts differs based on the average status of group members. A group of middle status, which on average comprises members of this status, focuses on both global and local status attainments and, as a result, experiences fewer status conflicts compared to high- and low-status groups, whose members predominantly concentrate on local status attainments. We tested our hypotheses in the Korean film industry from 2004 to 2017. The statistical findings indicate that status homophily among performers was negatively related to commercial success. However, films mainly featuring middle-status performers witnessed a positive effect of status homophily.

Suggested Citation

  • Youchung Kwon & Bo Kyung Kim, 2024. "When we unite, not divide: status homophily, group average status, and group performance in the Korean film industry," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 9-31, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:abaman:v:23:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41291-023-00258-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41291-023-00258-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41291-023-00258-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41291-023-00258-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodolphe Durand & Julien Jourdan, 2012. "Jules or Jim: Alternative conformity to minority logics," Post-Print hal-00772070, HAL.
    2. Julien Jourdan & Rodolphe Durand & Patricia Thornton, 2017. "The Price of Admission: Organizational Deference as Strategic Behavior," Post-Print hal-01629691, HAL.
    3. Corinne Bendersky & Neha Parikh Shah, 2012. "The Cost of Status Enhancement: Performance Effects of Individuals' Status Mobility in Task Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 308-322, April.
    4. Michael J. Mannor & Jamal Shamsie & Donald E. Conlon, 2016. "Does experience help or hinder top managers? Working with different types of resources in Hollywood," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1330-1340, July.
    5. Michelle M. Duguid & Denise Lewin Loyd & Pamela S. Tolbert, 2012. "The Impact of Categorical Status, Numeric Representation, and Work Group Prestige on Preference for Demographically Similar Others: A Value Threat Approach," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 386-401, April.
    6. Meichen Dong & Jie Jiao & Jun Xia, 2022. "Consequences of homophily: does social status similarity enhance project performance?," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 58-81, February.
    7. Stephen A. Rhoades, 1993. "The Herfindahl-Hirschman index," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), issue Mar, pages 188-189.
    8. Gino Cattani & Simone Ferriani, 2008. "A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(6), pages 824-844, December.
    9. Kim, Sunhyuk, 2013. "Uncertainty management strategies and the export performance of cultural goods: The case of the Korean movie industry from 2000 to 2004," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 689-705, November.
    10. Hiroshi Ono, 2018. "Career mobility in the embedded market: a study of the Japanese financial sector," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(5), pages 339-365, December.
    11. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    12. Kaixian Mao & Huidi Lu & Bilian Ni Sullivan, 2023. "The paradox of political legitimacy: the political inclusion and entrepreneurs’ firm strategies," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1712-1742, September.
    13. Loch, Christoph H. & Huberman, Bernardo A. & Stout, Suzanne, 2000. "Status competition and performance in work groups," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 35-55, September.
    14. Boris Groysberg & Jeffrey T. Polzer & Hillary Anger Elfenbein, 2011. "Too Many Cooks Spoil the Broth: How High-Status Individuals Decrease Group Effectiveness," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 722-737, June.
    15. Heeyon Kim & Bo Kyung Kim, 2022. "To be in Vogue: How mere proximity to high‐status neighbors affects aspirational pricing in the U.S. fashion industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 1208-1230, June.
    16. Gavin J. Kilduff & Robb Willer & Cameron Anderson, 2016. "Hierarchy and Its Discontents: Status Disagreement Leads to Withdrawal of Contribution and Lower Group Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 373-390, April.
    17. Corinne Bendersky & Nicholas A. Hays, 2012. "Status Conflict in Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 323-340, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pettit, Nathan C. & Doyle, Sarah P. & Lount, Robert B. & To, Christopher, 2016. "Cheating to get ahead or to avoid falling behind? The effect of potential negative versus positive status change on unethical behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 172-183.
    2. Meichen Dong & Jie Jiao & Jun Xia, 2022. "Consequences of homophily: does social status similarity enhance project performance?," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 58-81, February.
    3. H. Colleen Stuart, 2017. "Structural Disruption, Relational Experimentation, and Performance in Professional Hockey Teams: A Network Perspective on Member Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 283-300, April.
    4. Ya-Ru Chen & Randall S. Peterson & Damon J. Phillips & Joel M. Podolny & Cecilia L. Ridgeway, 2012. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Bringing Status to the Table—Attaining, Maintaining, and Experiencing Status in Organizations and Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 299-307, April.
    5. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    6. Matteo Prato & Fabrizio Ferraro, 2018. "Starstruck: How Hiring High-Status Employees Affects Incumbents’ Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 755-774, October.
    7. Cristina B. Gibson & Rebekah Dibble, 2013. "Excess May Do Harm: Investigating the Effect of Team External Environment on External Activities in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 697-715, June.
    8. Corinne Bendersky & Nicholas A. Hays, 2012. "Status Conflict in Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 323-340, April.
    9. Andrew M. Carton & Basima A. Tewfik, 2016. "Perspective—A New Look at Conflict Management in Work Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1125-1141, October.
    10. Lee, Hun Whee & Choi, Jin Nam & Kim, Seongsu, 2018. "Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 187-199.
    11. Caviggioli, Federico & Colombelli, Alessandra & Ravetti, Chiara, 2022. "Peers and stars: the role of gender among coinventors," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202217, University of Turin.
    12. Julien Jourdan, 2018. "Institutional Specialization and Survival: Theory and Evidence from the French Film Industry," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 408-425, June.
    13. Julien Jourdan, 2018. "Institutional Specialization and Survival : Theory and Evidence From the French Film Industry," Post-Print hal-01819590, HAL.
    14. Kilduff, Gavin J. & Anderson, Cameron & Willer, Robb, 2013. "Consensus and Contribution: Shared Status Hierarchies Promote Group Success," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt77q7n684, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    15. Sang Yoon Shin, 2019. "Network advantage’s effect on exit performance: examining venture capital’s inter-organizational networks," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 21-42, March.
    16. Gavin J. Kilduff & Robb Willer & Cameron Anderson, 2016. "Hierarchy and Its Discontents: Status Disagreement Leads to Withdrawal of Contribution and Lower Group Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 373-390, April.
    17. Henrik Franke & Stephanie Eckerd & Kai Foerstl, 2022. "Rising to the Top: Motivational Forces Influencing Status Conflict in Sourcing Teams," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 963-983, March.
    18. Diestre, Luis & Lumineau, Fabrice & Durand, Rodolphe, 2023. "Litigate or let it go? Multi-market contact and IP infringement-litigation dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    19. Tsedal B. Neeley, 2013. "Language Matters: Status Loss and Achieved Status Distinctions in Global Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 476-497, April.
    20. Guangxi Zhang & Jianan Zhong & Muammer Ozer, 2020. "Status Threat and Ethical Leadership: A Power-Dependence Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 665-685, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:abaman:v:23:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41291-023-00258-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.