IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0308352.html

Not on the right rung for me? How status inconsistency leads to avoidance of status-threatening ties in NCAA

Author

Listed:
  • Keehyuk Ra
  • Bo Kyung Kim

Abstract

This study examines the impact of status inconsistency on status-threatening activities within NCAA Division I men’s basketball teams. Specifically, we focus on a nested form of status that includes both individual and group-level elements. We argue that organizations dealing with status inconsistency stemming from such nested form face challenges in reducing status inconsistency. To maintain their deserved status, these status-inconsistent organizations tend to avoid activities that could further threaten their status, despite potential economic gains. An analysis of NCAA Division I men’s basketball scheduling data from 2000 to 2019 provides robust support to our theoretical arguments. Our findings suggest that the status inconsistency between a team’s status and its conference status diminished the likelihood of scheduling games with non-Division I teams, a behavior considered counter-normative in this context. This effect is most prominent among teams in “Mid Major” conferences, while teams with recent participation in the NCAA Tournament show a mitigated effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Keehyuk Ra & Bo Kyung Kim, 2024. "Not on the right rung for me? How status inconsistency leads to avoidance of status-threatening ties in NCAA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308352
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308352
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308352&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0308352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Ocasio, 2011. "Attention to Attention," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1286-1296, October.
    2. Pengfei Wang & Michael Jensen, 2019. "A Bridge Too Far: Divestiture as a Strategic Reaction to Status Inconsistency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 859-878, February.
    3. Greta Hsu & Michael T. Hannan, 2005. "Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 474-490, October.
    4. Wei Zhao & Xueguang Zhou, 2011. "Status Inconsistency and Product Valuation in the California Wine Market," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1435-1448, December.
    5. Taylor, Erik C. & McLarty, Benjamin D. & Henderson, Dale A., 2018. "The Fire under the Gridiron: Resource Dependence and NCAA Conference Realignment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 246-259.
    6. Youchung Kwon & Bo Kyung Kim, 2024. "When we unite, not divide: status homophily, group average status, and group performance in the Korean film industry," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 9-31, February.
    7. Zhi Huang & Marvin Washington, 2015. "Assimilation or Contrast? Status Inequality, Judgment of Product Quality, and Product Choices in Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1752-1768, December.
    8. Matthew S. Bothner & Young-Kyu Kim & Edward Bishop Smith, 2012. "How Does Status Affect Performance? Status as an Asset vs. Status as a Liability in the PGA and NASCAR," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 416-433, April.
    9. Christopher I. Rider & Giacomo Negro, 2015. "Organizational Failure and Intraprofessional Status Loss," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 633-649, June.
    10. Bouchet, Adrien & Laird, Mary Dana & Troilo, Mike & Hutchinson, Michael & Ferris, Gerald, 2017. "Effects of increased commitment on reputation and status: Evidence from NCAA Division I universities," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 395-407.
    11. Adrien Bouchet & Mary Dana Laird & Mike Troilo & Michael Hutchinson & Gerald Ferris, 2017. "Effects of increased commitment on reputation and status: Evidence from NCAA Division I universities," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 395-407, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joris Knoben & Leon A. G. Oerlemans & Annefleur R. Krijkamp & Keith G. Provan, 2018. "What Do They Know? The Antecedents of Information Accuracy Differentials in Interorganizational Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 471-488, June.
    2. Heeyon Kim & Bo Kyung Kim, 2022. "To be in Vogue: How mere proximity to high‐status neighbors affects aspirational pricing in the U.S. fashion industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 1208-1230, June.
    3. Yidi Guo & Xiaowei Rose Luo & Danyang Li, 2022. "Hierarchical Inconsistency: A Monitoring Mechanism to Reduce Securities Fraud in Emerging Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 2187-2208, November.
    4. Nite, Calvin & Hutchinson, Michael & Bouchet, Adrien, 2019. "Toward an institutional theory of escalation of commitment within sport management: A review and future directions," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 571-583.
    5. Dimo Ringov & Aman Asija & John Joseph & Gabriel Szulanski, 2026. "Dual Demands, Attention, and Organizational Learning: Spatial and Temporal Replication of Routines in Scaling Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 915-941, May.
    6. Michael Jensen & Torsten Twardawski & Nadja Younes, 2022. "The Paradox of Awards: How Status Ripples Affect Who Benefits from CEO Awards," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 946-968, May.
    7. Roxana Barbulescu & Rocio Bonet, 2024. "Looking for Greener Grass? Prior Status and Exploration-Exploitation Decisions in Job Search," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 159-176, January.
    8. Elisabeth Yang & Julia DiBenigno, 2025. "Opportunistic Change During a Punctuation: How and When the Front Lines Can Drive Bursts of Incremental Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 40-64, January.
    9. Cosmina Lelia Voinea & Hans van Kranenburg, 2017. "Media Influence and Firms Behaviour: A Stakeholder Management Perspective," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 23-38, October.
    10. Andrew Isaak & Baris Istipliler & Suleika Bort & Michael Woywode, 2025. "Regulation, Corruption, and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: Insights from Bitcoin Trading and Platform Founding Between 2011 and 2023," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 2210-2244, November.
    11. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    12. Jörg Claussen & Maria A. Halbinger & Lior Zalmanson, 2026. "Challenge Accepted: The Effects of Contest Participation on a User-Generated Content Community," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 421-439, March.
    13. Yichen Wang & Christopher Marquis, 2025. "Does Product Market Competition Promote or Reduce Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility Behavior? How Stakeholder Attention Shapes Responsiveness to Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(4), pages 867-896, September.
    14. Cecilia Varendh-Mansson & Tyler Wry & Ariane Szafarz, 2020. "Anchors Aweigh? Then Time to Head Upstream Why we Need to Theorize “Mission” before “Drift”," Working Papers CEB PostPrintCEB024, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Shuting Chen & Liping Huang & Aojie Zhou, 2025. "How Knowledge Management Capability Drives Sustainable Business Model Innovation: A Combination of Symmetric and Asymmetric Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Joseph McManus, 2021. "Emotions and Ethical Decision Making at Work: Organizational Norms, Emotional Dogs, and the Rational Tales They Tell Themselves and Others," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 153-168, February.
    17. Sebrek, Szabolcs S. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Kosztyán, Zsolt T., 2025. "How to create dynamic capabilities: A design science study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    18. Pierpaolo Andriani & Carsten Herrmann-Pillath, 2015. "Transactional innovation as performative action: transforming comparative advantage in the global coffee business," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 371-400, April.
    19. Julio A. Pertuze & Gonzalo Valdés & Tomás H. Reyes, 2026. "Looking back to move forward: social benchmarks and historical performance in CEO turnover," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 869-901, March.
    20. Alexis Laszczuk & Lionel Garreau & Bernard de Montmorillon, 2017. "Understanding emergence in business model development: how companies interact with stakeholders to deal with environmental ambiguity," Post-Print hal-01787276, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.