IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0308352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not on the right rung for me? How status inconsistency leads to avoidance of status-threatening ties in NCAA

Author

Listed:
  • Keehyuk Ra
  • Bo Kyung Kim

Abstract

This study examines the impact of status inconsistency on status-threatening activities within NCAA Division I men’s basketball teams. Specifically, we focus on a nested form of status that includes both individual and group-level elements. We argue that organizations dealing with status inconsistency stemming from such nested form face challenges in reducing status inconsistency. To maintain their deserved status, these status-inconsistent organizations tend to avoid activities that could further threaten their status, despite potential economic gains. An analysis of NCAA Division I men’s basketball scheduling data from 2000 to 2019 provides robust support to our theoretical arguments. Our findings suggest that the status inconsistency between a team’s status and its conference status diminished the likelihood of scheduling games with non-Division I teams, a behavior considered counter-normative in this context. This effect is most prominent among teams in “Mid Major” conferences, while teams with recent participation in the NCAA Tournament show a mitigated effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Keehyuk Ra & Bo Kyung Kim, 2024. "Not on the right rung for me? How status inconsistency leads to avoidance of status-threatening ties in NCAA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308352
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308352
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308352&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0308352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pengfei Wang & Michael Jensen, 2019. "A Bridge Too Far: Divestiture as a Strategic Reaction to Status Inconsistency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 859-878, February.
    2. Greta Hsu & Michael T. Hannan, 2005. "Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 474-490, October.
    3. Wei Zhao & Xueguang Zhou, 2011. "Status Inconsistency and Product Valuation in the California Wine Market," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1435-1448, December.
    4. Taylor, Erik C. & McLarty, Benjamin D. & Henderson, Dale A., 2018. "The Fire under the Gridiron: Resource Dependence and NCAA Conference Realignment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 246-259.
    5. Youchung Kwon & Bo Kyung Kim, 2024. "When we unite, not divide: status homophily, group average status, and group performance in the Korean film industry," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 9-31, February.
    6. Zhi Huang & Marvin Washington, 2015. "Assimilation or Contrast? Status Inequality, Judgment of Product Quality, and Product Choices in Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1752-1768, December.
    7. Matthew S. Bothner & Young-Kyu Kim & Edward Bishop Smith, 2012. "How Does Status Affect Performance? Status as an Asset vs. Status as a Liability in the PGA and NASCAR," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 416-433, April.
    8. Christopher I. Rider & Giacomo Negro, 2015. "Organizational Failure and Intraprofessional Status Loss," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 633-649, June.
    9. Bouchet, Adrien & Laird, Mary Dana & Troilo, Mike & Hutchinson, Michael & Ferris, Gerald, 2017. "Effects of increased commitment on reputation and status: Evidence from NCAA Division I universities," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 395-407.
    10. Adrien Bouchet & Mary Dana Laird & Mike Troilo & Michael Hutchinson & Gerald Ferris, 2017. "Effects of increased commitment on reputation and status: Evidence from NCAA Division I universities," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 395-407, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nite, Calvin & Hutchinson, Michael & Bouchet, Adrien, 2019. "Toward an institutional theory of escalation of commitment within sport management: A review and future directions," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 571-583.
    2. Heeyon Kim & Bo Kyung Kim, 2022. "To be in Vogue: How mere proximity to high‐status neighbors affects aspirational pricing in the U.S. fashion industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 1208-1230, June.
    3. Brad Humphreys & Bernd Frick, 2019. "Prize Structure and Performance: Evidence from NASCAR," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Cosmina Lelia Voinea & Hans van Kranenburg, 2017. "Media Influence and Firms Behaviour: A Stakeholder Management Perspective," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 23-38, October.
    5. Başak Topaler & Eyüp Tolunay Küp, 2020. "Judgments of Capability and Conformity as Distinct Forms of Social Judgments, and the Way They Interact to Shape Evaluator Decisions," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1634-1641, July.
    6. Cecilia Varendh-Mansson & Tyler Wry & Ariane Szafarz, 2020. "Anchors Aweigh? Then Time to Head Upstream Why we Need to Theorize “Mission” before “Drift”," Working Papers CEB PostPrintCEB024, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Cefis, Elena & Leoncini, Riccardo & Marengo, Luigi, 2024. "Is innovation failure just a dead end?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 481-493.
    8. Pierpaolo Andriani & Carsten Herrmann-Pillath, 2015. "Transactional innovation as performative action: transforming comparative advantage in the global coffee business," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 371-400, April.
    9. Yu-Chieh Lo, Jade, 2015. "Selling science: Resource mobilization strategies in the emerging field of nanotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1513-1526.
    10. Peng, George Z. & Beamish, Paul W., 2019. "Subnational FDI Legitimacy and Foreign Subsidiary Survival," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 1-1.
    11. Krzeminska, Anna & Lundmark, Erik & Härtel, Charmine E.J., 2021. "Legitimation of a heterogeneous market category through covert prototype differentiation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).
    12. Shen, Huijun & Coreynen, Wim & Huang, Can, 2022. "Exclusive licensing of university technology: The effects of university prestige, technology transfer offices, and academy-industry collaboration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    13. Balázs Kovács & Greta Hsu & Amanda Sharkey, 2024. "The Stickiness of Category Labels: Audience Perception and Evaluation of Producer Repositioning in Creative Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 6315-6335, September.
    14. Gotsopoulos, Aleksios & Pitsakis, Konstantinos, 2024. "United we stand? Organizational groups and spinoff mortality in the context of academic entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    15. Michael Lounsbury & Christine M. Beckman, 2015. "Celebrating Organization Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 288-308, March.
    16. Chirag Kasbekar, 2020. "Adaptation of New Organizations to Legitimacy Shocks: Postbellum Firearms Firms in the U.S. South, 1866–1914," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 355-377, March.
    17. Wang, Pengfei, 2019. "Price space and product demography: Evidence from the workstation industry, 1980–1996," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    18. Li, Lambert Zixin & Soule, Sarah A., 2021. "Corporate Activism and Corporate Identity," SocArXiv p8gqz, Center for Open Science.
    19. Vanessa C. Burbano, 2021. "The Demotivating Effects of Communicating a Social-Political Stance: Field Experimental Evidence from an Online Labor Market Platform," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 1004-1025, February.
    20. O’Kane, Conor & Mangematin, Vincent & Geoghegan, Will & Fitzgerald, Ciara, 2015. "University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 421-437.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.