IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2020i3p433-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Professed Culture of the Business Organizations in the Defense Industry in Bulgaria. What Does it Look Like? And do they Need it?

Author

Listed:
  • Kiril Dimitrov

    (University of National and World Economy, Bulgaria)

  • Ivaylo Ivanov

    (University of National and World Economy, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Purpose – This article aims to outline and analyze the role, structure and dominating content of professed organizational culture among the companies in the defense industry in Bulgaria as conscious and the official expression of their leadership intentions within the contemporary business environment, uniquely justifying the existence of each entity. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative study is conducted, based on a literature review of academic publications in the sphere of professed organizational culture. Furthermore, the websites of the target companies were carefully examined in order to outline the practical approach to presenting the unique official culture of defense business organizations. Findings – An elaborate set of cultural attributes to be found on the second level in Edgar Schein’s model of organizational culture is identified. Based on literature review, the intersection between official corporate culture expressions and defense sector is outlined. Important nuances in the development of Bulgarian defense, technological and industrial base are described, encompassing the transition period to market economy and democratic political system. A survey of professed culture attributes is conducted among the members of Bulgarian defense, technological and industrial base. It is concluded that these companies prefer disclosing their official cultures in a very succinct way to utilizing the potential power and impact of the most popular firm documents in this field as mission and vision or relying on small number of their simpler building elements. Recommendations to senior managers of the Bulgarian defense companies regarding smart and intensive use of official culture elements are given. Research limitations/implications – The financial data for the surveyed companies is not accessible. Originality/value – A snapshot of preferred professed culture attributes among the members of Bulgarian defense, technological and industrial base is composed, implying their leadership strategic intentions. The second level in Edgar Schein’s model of organizational culture is populated with a set of cultural attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiril Dimitrov & Ivaylo Ivanov, 2020. "The Professed Culture of the Business Organizations in the Defense Industry in Bulgaria. What Does it Look Like? And do they Need it?," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 433-470, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2020:i:3:p:433-470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/eajournal/2020.3/EA.2020.3.06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominik Maximini, 2015. "The Scrum Culture," Management for Professionals, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-11827-7, December.
    2. Dimitrov, Kiril, 2012. "Natural analogies among organizational culture models," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 99-125.
    3. Anonymous, 1949. "Council for Mutual Economic Assistance," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 564-564, August.
    4. Dimitrov, Kiril & Geshkov, Marin, 2018. "Dominating Attributes Of Professed Firm Culture Of Holding Companies – Members Of The Bulgarian Industrial Capital Association," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(3), pages 384-418.
    5. Christopher Kenneth, Mark C. Bart Baetz, 1998. "The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Firm Performance: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 823-853, November.
    6. Anonymous, 1949. "Council of Mutual Economic Assistance," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 379-380, May.
    7. Dimitrov, Kiril, 2013. "Edgar Schein’s model of organizational culture levels as a hologram," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 22(4), pages 3-36.
    8. Dimitrov, Kiril, 2013. "Mapping organization culture with complex multi-level models," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 309-338.
    9. Leuthesser, Lance & Kohli, Chiranjeev, 1997. "Corporate identity: The role of mission statements," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 59-66.
    10. Cheryl Nakata, 2009. "Going Beyond Hofstede: Why We Need to and How," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Cheryl Nakata (ed.), Beyond Hofstede, chapter 1, pages 3-15, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kiril Dimitrov & Marin Geshkov, 2018. "Dominating Attributes Of Professed Firm Culture Of Holding Companies – Members Of The Bulgarian Industrial Capital Association," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 384-418, September.
    2. Surubaru, Alina, 2007. "Dress for success? Entrepreneurial careers in the Romanian garment industry," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 8(2), pages 18-24.
    3. Mersland, Roy & Nyarko, Samuel Anokye & Szafarz, Ariane, 2019. "Do social enterprises walk the talk? Assessing microfinance performances with mission statements," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Odile Paulus, 2008. "La déclaration de mission, une revue de la littérature," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2008-13, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    5. Barbara Bartkus & Myron Glassman, 2008. "Do Firms Practice What They Preach? The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Stakeholder Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(2), pages 207-216, December.
    6. Lin, YiHsin & Ryan, Chris, 2016. "From mission statement to airline branding," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 150-160.
    7. Lara Penco & Giorgia Profumo & Roberta Scarsi, 2017. "Stakeholder Orientation in Cruise Lines’ Mission Statements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Jongdo Jeon & Keun Tae Cho, 2021. "Differences in Readability, Keywords, and Orientation of Mission Statements of the Top 100 Korean and Top 100 US Traditional and Innovative Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Subhanjan Sengupta & Arunaditya Sahay, 2017. "Comparing mission statements of social enterprises and corporate enterprises in the new and renewable energy sector of India: a computer aided content analysis study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Sheikh Shamim Hasnain, 2020. "A Critical Comparison between Manufacturing and Service Firms’ Mission Statements: Manage Your Firms’ Mission Statements with Care Using Readability and Lexical Techniques," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 216-231, June.
    11. Pascual Berrone & Jordi Surroca & Josep Tribó, 2007. "Corporate Ethical Identity as a Determinant of Firm Performance: A Test of the Mediating Role of Stakeholder Satisfaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 35-53, November.
    12. Julian D. Cortes & Liliana Rivera & Katerina Bohle Carbonell, 2021. "Mission Statements in Universities: Readability and performance," Papers 2104.07438, arXiv.org.
    13. Julian D. Cortes & Diego Tellez & Jesus Godoy, 2021. "Mission Statement Effect on Research and Innovation Performance," Papers 2104.07476, arXiv.org.
    14. Varsha Jain & Niriksha Paul & Ganesh B.E. & Dhruvinkumar Chauhan, 2016. "Corporate Identity: Developing Means For Sustainable Competitive Advantage In Indian Context Towards Model Development," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 7(1).
    15. Shannon Orr & Rebecca Humphreys, 2012. "Mission Rivalry: Use and Preservation Conflicts in National Parks Policy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 85-98, March.
    16. Feiran Dong & Yongzhen Xie & Linjun Cao, 2019. "Board Power Hierarchy, Corporate Mission, and Green Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-27, September.
    17. Maria Alexandra MAASSEN, 2018. "Sustainable Business Models: An Imperative in the Strategic Management of Companies and Organizations," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 323-335, June.
    18. Nikolay Peshev, 2020. "Differing Reputation from Brand, Image and Identity," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 9(2), pages 169-175, August.
    19. Bayrak, Tuncay, 2020. "A content analysis of top-ranked universities’ mission statements from five global regions," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Mark Rogers, 2001. "The Effect of Diversification on Firm Performance," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2001n02, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2020:i:3:p:433-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.