IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nap/nijsrr/2018p33-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate Smart Agriculture System – As a Review

Author

Listed:
  • Fawzy , Z.F

    (Agriculture and Biological Research Division, National Research Centre –Egypt)

  • Li Yunsheng

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research- Chinese Academy of Science, China)

  • Shaymaa I, Shedeed

    (Agriculture and Biological Research Division National Research Centre –Egypt)

  • A.M El-Bassiony

    (Agriculture and Biological Research Division, National Research Centre –Egypt)

Abstract

Smart Climate Agriculture (CSA) is an approach used in agriculture to achieve the highest agricultural productivity of horticultural and field crops while preserving natural resources for future generations and also to minimize greenhouse gas emissions as well as adapting to future climate change. Therefore, the main objective of applying the climate smart farming approach is to improve the farming system in both developing and developed countries. The application of smart climate agriculture at the global level ensures the achievement of several important objectives, including maximizing the use of natural resources and improving the productivity and quality of horticultural crops and field and obtain good fruits safe and healthy and clean the domestic production and export to foreign markets, Climatically minimizes emissions of gases such as carbon dioxide, methane and others and achieves the sustainability of the agro-ecosystem. Climate smart agriculture is an approach aimed at improving the farming system. Therefore, the components of smart agriculture are climatically expressed as traditional conventional agriculture, excluding roads that lead to the depletion of natural resources, as well as avoidance of malpractice practices such as excessive use of chemical pesticides or chemical fertilizers and CSA, good tools and good farming systems that increase productivity and quality without depleting natural resources such as good agricultural practices, biogas and organic systems, which in turn depend on bio-fertilization and To improve the agricultural land and natural resources of the land as well as improve the quality of the final agricultural product. To conclude, Climate Smart Agriculture is a productive agro-ecosystem which might be very resilient and adaptive to climate change scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Fawzy , Z.F & Li Yunsheng & Shaymaa I, Shedeed & A.M El-Bassiony, 2018. "Climate Smart Agriculture System – As a Review," Noble International Journal of Scientific Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 2(6), pages 33-41, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nap:nijsrr:2018:p:33-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.napublisher.org/pdf-files/NIJSR-363-33-41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.napublisher.org/?ic=journal&journal=9&month=06-2018&issue=6&volume=2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2010. "World Development Report 2010," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 4387, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Das Gupta, Monica & Bongaarts, John & Cleland, John, 2011. "Population, poverty, and sustainable development : a review of the evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5719, The World Bank.
    2. Ahmet Faruk Aysan & …mer Faruk Baykal & Marie-Ange Véganzonès–Varoudakis, 2011. "The Effects of Convergence in Governance on Capital Accumulation in the Black Sea Economic Cooperation Countries," Chapters, in: Mehmet Ugur & David Sunderland (ed.), Does Economic Governance Matter?, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. van de Walle, Dominique, 2011. "Lasting welfare effects of widowhood in a poor country," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5734, The World Bank.
    4. Newburry, William & Gardberg, Naomi A. & Sanchez, Juan I., 2014. "Employer Attractiveness in Latin America: The Association Among Foreignness, Internationalization and Talent Recruitment," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 327-344.
    5. Narita, Daiju, 2010. "Climate policy, technology choice, and multiple equilibria in a developing economy," Kiel Working Papers 1590, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Meltem Dayioğlu & Sirma Demir Şeker, 2016. "Social Policy and the Dynamics of Early Childhood Poverty in Turkey," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 540-557, October.
    7. Mahtta, Richa & Joshi, P.K. & Jindal, Alok Kumar, 2014. "Solar power potential mapping in India using remote sensing inputs and environmental parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 255-262.
    8. Onder, Harun, 2012. "Trade and Climate Change: An Analytical Review of Key Issues," World Bank - Economic Premise, The World Bank, issue 86, pages 1-8, August.
    9. Andrew Zeitlin & Stefano Caria & Richman Dzene & Petr Janský & Emmanuel Opoku & Francis Teal, 2010. "Heterogeneous returns and the persistence of agricultural technology adoption," CSAE Working Paper Series 2010-37, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    10. N. Bloom, 2016. "Fluctuations in uncertainty," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 4.
    11. Ayala-Cantu, Luciano & Morando, Bruno, 2020. "Rental markets, gender, and land certificates: Evidence from Vietnam," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Albert N. Honlonkou & Rashid M. Hassan, 2015. "Developing Countries' Response To The Clean Development Mechanism Under Imperfect Information And Transaction Costs," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-22.
    13. Mohamed Ali Marouani & Rim Mouelhi, 2016. "Contribution of Structural Change to Productivity Growth: Evidence from Tunisia," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 25(1), pages 110-132.
    14. Thomas Bassetti & Nikos Benos & Stelios Karagiannis, 2013. "CO 2 Emissions and Income Dynamics: What Does the Global Evidence Tell Us?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(1), pages 101-125, January.
    15. Myriam Ben Saâd & Giscard Assoumou-Ella, 2019. "Economic Complexity and Gender Inequality in Education: An Empirical Study," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(1), pages 321-334.
    16. Javier Herrera & Mireille Razafindrakoto & François Roubaud, 2013. "Les sciences sociales au service du débat démocratique au Sud:enjeux, supports, retombées. Résultats d'expériences dans le champ de l'économie et de la statistique," Working Papers DT/2013/02, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    17. Simone Borghesi & Giorgia Giovannetti & Gianluca Iannucci & Paolo Russu, 2019. "The Dynamics of Foreign Direct Investments in Land and Pollution Accumulation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(1), pages 135-154, January.
    18. Arun S. Malik & Stephen C. Smith, 2012. "Adaptation To Climate Change In Low-Income Countries: Lessons From Current Research And Needs From Future Research," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-22.
    19. Peter Warr & Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2011. "Reducing Indonesia’s deforestation‐based greenhouse gas emissions," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(3), pages 297-321, July.
    20. NGUYEN Anh Tuan, 2015. "Neutralising the Advantages of State-Owned Enterprises for a Fair Playing Field," Working Papers DP-2015-79, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nap:nijsrr:2018:p:33-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.napublisher.org/?ic=journal&journal=9&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.