IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mmb/journl/articl_v1_10_16.html

The Use Of The Project Method In Public Administration In Modern Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Ignatova Anna M.

    (Associate professor of the Department of Political Governance St. Petersburg State University)

Abstract

Governability today serves as an important criterion for success of public administration. It assumes new forms of political, economic and social organization. It can help the state to respond to the challenges of globalization, modernization, to changes of individual and collective values, to increasing social demands and expectations which often exceed the limit of traditional institutions. Governability and inclusive growth – the main landmarks of the modern public policy, which the author connects with the development of communication, dialogue and cooperation in society. It means that the responsibility for the quality of governance is rested not only on the state but on civil society also

Suggested Citation

  • Ignatova Anna M., 2016. "The Use Of The Project Method In Public Administration In Modern Russia," Annals of marketing-mba, Department of Marketing, Marketing MBA (RSconsult), vol. 1, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:mmb:journl:articl_v1_10_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.marketing-mba.ru/article/v1_16/Ignatova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Maggiar & Antoine Devulder & Christophe Cahn & Stéphane Adjemian, 2008. "Variantes en univers incertain," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 183(2), pages 223-238.
    2. Glenn Ellison, 2005. "A Model of Add-On Pricing," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 120(2), pages 585-637.
    3. Joseph K.W. Fung & Philip L.H. Yu, 2007. "Order imbalance and the dynamics of index and futures prices," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(12), pages 1129-1157, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:mmb:journl:articl_v4_3_15 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ahmadi, Iman & Skiera, Bernd & Lambrecht, Anja & Heubrandner, Florian, 2017. "Time preferences and the pricing of complementary durables and consumables," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 813-828.
    3. Andreas Haupt & Zoe Hitzig, 2023. "Opaque Contracts," Papers 2301.13404, arXiv.org.
    4. Naixin Zhu, 2023. "Dissertation on Applied Microeconomics of Freemium Pricing Strategies in Mobile App Market," Papers 2305.09479, arXiv.org.
    5. Bonatti, Alessandro & Bergemann, Dirk & Haupt, Andreas & Smolin, Alex, 2021. "The Optimality of Upgrade Pricing," CEPR Discussion Papers 16394, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    6. Matthew Selove, 2014. "A Dynamic Model of Competitive Entry Response," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 353-363, May.
    7. Stole, Lars A., 2007. "Price Discrimination and Competition," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 34, pages 2221-2299, Elsevier.
    8. DeGraba, Patrick, 2006. "The loss leader is a turkey: Targeted discounts from multi-product competitors," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 613-628, May.
    9. Soheil Ghili & K. Sudhir & Nitish Jain & Ankur Garg, 2025. "Second-degree Price Discrimination: Theoretical Analysis, Experiment Design, and Empirical Estimation," Papers 2507.13426, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    10. Salvatore Piccolo & Piero Tedeschi & Giovanni Ursino, 2018. "Deceptive Advertising with Rational Buyers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1291-1310, March.
    11. Karanki, Fecri & Schaufele, Roger, 2025. "Profit Efficiency: Insight into airline business models and strategic choices," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Chioveanu, Ioana & Zhou, Jidong, 2009. "Price Competition and Consumer Confusion," MPRA Paper 17340, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Heski Bar-Isaac & Guillermo Caruana & Vicente Cunat, 2007. "Information Gathering Externalities in Product Markets," Working Papers 07-18, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    14. Bianchi, Milo & Bouvard, Matthieu & Gomes, Renato & Rhodes, Andrew & Shreeti, Vatsala, 2023. "Mobile payments and interoperability: Insights from the academic literature," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    15. Jang, Seongsoo & Chung, Jaihak, 2021. "What drives add-on sales in mobile games? The role of inter-price relationship and product popularity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 59-68.
    16. Jonathan Levin, 2011. "The Economics of Internet Markets," Discussion Papers 10-018, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    17. Tiziana D'Alfonso & Valentina Bracaglia & Yulai Wan, 2015. "Airport cities and multiproduct pricing," DIAG Technical Reports 2015-14, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    18. Herweg, Fabian & Rosato, Antonio, 2018. "Bait and Ditch: Consumer Naiveté and Salesforce Incentives," CEPR Discussion Papers 12612, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    19. Mark Jansen & Samuel Kruger & Gonzalo Maturana, 2025. "Dealer Financing in the Subprime Auto Market: Markups and Implicit Subsidies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(12), pages 10692-10706, December.
    20. Fisher, Jack & Gavazza, Alessandro & Liu, Lu & Ramadorai, Tarun & Tripathy, Jagdish, 2024. "Refinancing cross-subsidies in the mortgage market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    21. Ben McQuillin & Robert Sugden, 2012. "Reconciling normative and behavioural economics: the problems to be solved," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(4), pages 553-567, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mmb:journl:articl_v1_10_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sidorchuk, Roman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rsconru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.