IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mfa/journl/v30y2022i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Market Strength, Information Asymmetry, and Industrial Characteristics on Malaysian Firms’ CAR During COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Saw Imm Song

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.)

  • Jennifer Tunga Janang

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Sarawak, Malaysia.)

  • Erimalida Yazi

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Sarawak, Malaysia.)

  • Fareiny Morni

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Sarawak, Malaysia.)

Abstract

Research Question: Would the COVID-19 pandemic induce investment opportunities or threats for companies listed at Bursa Malaysia? Motivation: This study investigates whether the market strength and information asymmetry experienced during a crisis and industrial characteristics have an impact on shareholders’ abnormal returns. Idea: The study uses market strength as measured by trading volume and information asymmetry as measured by bid-ask spread aims to suggest potential investment opportunities in different categories of industries for investors. Data: The study uses data of 620 companies listed on Bursa Malaysia, collected from 16 Mar 2020 to 9 Jun 2020. The data were divided into 3 event windows based on the government’s Movement Control Order (MCO) announcements. Method/ Tools: The event study method is used to calculate the cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) as the dependent variable. Multiple regression analysis with hierarchical model specifications were used in assessing the impact of the explanatory variables on the dependent variables. Findings: The findings suggest that during periods of uncertainty, firm characteristics such as larger and older firms are at a disadvantage compared to smaller and younger firms. In terms of market characteristics, the study shows that Increased trading volume has greater returns to investors. However, the bigger bid-ask spread associated with higher abnormal returns reflects the inefficiency of the stock market. This study also found that in the month following the announcement of the first MCO, the CAR of firms in vulnerable industries reduced by an extra 5% compared to firms who were not classified as vulnerable industry category. As the MCO prolonged, the CAR of firms in vulnerable industries fell by an extra 9.5% compared to other firms listed in Bursa Malaysia. The negative impact on the vulnerable industries shows glooming prospects of those firms. Contributions: Market reactions to pandemics and MCOs are negative especially at the beginning period. The strength of the market, information asymmetry, and industrial characteristics have a strong influence on the abnormal returns during the observed periods. The study also shows that historical financial track records are not good predictors of a firm’s prospects during this unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Saw Imm Song & Jennifer Tunga Janang & Erimalida Yazi & Fareiny Morni, 2022. "The Effects of Market Strength, Information Asymmetry, and Industrial Characteristics on Malaysian Firms’ CAR During COVID-19 Pandemic," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mfa.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/v30_i1_a1_pg1-15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saw-Imm Song & Dorothy Chiok Choo Kueh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Ei-Yet Chu, 2011. "Wealth effects and financial performance of cross-border mergers and acquisitions in five East Asian countries," American Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 219-240.
    2. Lukas Buchheim & Jonas Dovern & Carla Krolage & Sebastian Link, 2020. "Firm-Level Expectations and Behavior in Response to the Covid-19 Crisis," CESifo Working Paper Series 8304, CESifo.
    3. Binder, John J, 1998. "The Event Study Methodology since 1969," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 111-137, September.
    4. Amihud, Yakov & Mendelson, Haim, 1986. "Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 223-249, December.
    5. Greenwald, Bruce C., 1983. "A general analysis of bias in the estimated standard errors of least squares coefficients," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 323-338, August.
    6. Leirvik, Thomas & Fiskerstrand, Sondre R. & Fjellvikås, Anders B., 2017. "Market liquidity and stock returns in the Norwegian stock market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 272-276.
    7. Huong Le & Andros Gregoriou, 2020. "How Do You Capture Liquidity? A Review Of The Literature On Low‐Frequency Stock Liquidity," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 1170-1186, December.
    8. Hassan, Tarek & Hollander, Stephan & van Lent, Laurence & Schwedeler, Markus & Tahoun, Ahmed, 2020. "Firm-Level Exposure to Epidemic Diseases: Covid-19, SARS, and H1N1," CEPR Discussion Papers 14573, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Ding, Wenzhi & Levine, Ross & Lin, Chen & Xie, Wensi, 2021. "Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 802-830.
    10. Scott R. Baker & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Kyle J. Kost & Marco C. Sammon & Tasaneeya Viratyosin, 2020. "The Unprecedented Stock Market Impact of COVID-19," NBER Working Papers 26945, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. HaiYue Liu & Aqsa Manzoor & CangYu Wang & Lei Zhang & Zaira Manzoor, 2020. "The COVID-19 Outbreak and Affected Countries Stock Markets Response," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Xin Gu & Shan Ying & Weiqiang Zhang & Yewei Tao, 2020. "How Do Firms Respond to COVID-19? First Evidence from Suzhou, China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 2181-2197, August.
    13. Liu, Hao & Yi, Xingjian & Yin, Libo, 2021. "The impact of operating flexibility on firms’ performance during the COVID-19 outbreak: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    14. Lee, Bong-Soo & Rui, Oliver M., 2002. "The dynamic relationship between stock returns and trading volume: Domestic and cross-country evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 51-78, January.
    15. Pius Babuna & Xiaohua Yang & Amatus Gyilbag & Doris Abra Awudi & David Ngmenbelle & Dehui Bian, 2020. "The Impact of COVID-19 on the Insurance Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Karafiath, Imre, 1988. "Using Dummy Variables in the Event Methodology," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 23(3), pages 351-357, August.
    17. Demsetz, Harold, 1986. "Corporate Control, Insider Trading, and Rates of Return," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 313-316, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ștefan Cristian Gherghina & Daniel Ștefan Armeanu & Camelia Cătălina Joldeș, 2020. "Stock Market Reactions to COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak: Quantitative Evidence from ARDL Bounds Tests and Granger Causality Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-35, September.
    2. Wang, Zhixuan & Dong, Yanli & Liu, Ailan, 2022. "How does China's stock market react to supply chain disruptions from COVID-19?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Shasha Liu & Gaowen Kong & Dongmin Kong, 2020. "Effects of the COVID-19 on Air Quality: Human Mobility, Spillover Effects, and City Connections," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 635-653, August.
    4. Ferragina, Anna Maria & Iandolo, Stefano, 2022. "Reacting to the economic fallout of the COVID-19: Evidence on debt exposure and asset management of Italian firms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 530-547.
    5. Zhang, Si Ying, 2021. "Using equity market reactions and network analysis to infer global supply chain interdependencies in the context of COVID-19," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Isabel Carrillo-Hidalgo & Juan Ignacio Pulido-Fernández & José Luis Durán-Román & Jairo Casado-Montilla, 2023. "COVID-19 and tourism sector stock price in Spain: medium-term relationship through dynamic regression models," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Ho, Tuan & Kim, Kirak & Li, Yang & Xu, Fangming, 2023. "Does real flexibility help firms navigate the COVID-19 pandemic?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    8. Tetyana Balyuk & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Manju Puri, 2020. "Indirect Costs of Government Aid and Intermediary Supply Effects: Lessons From the Paycheck Protection Program," NBER Working Papers 28114, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Chebbi, Kaouther & Ammer, Mohammed Abdullah & Hameed, Affan, 2021. "The COVID-19 pandemic and stock liquidity: Evidence from S&P 500," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 134-142.
    10. Silva, Thiago Christiano & Wilhelm, Paulo Victor Berri & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda, 2022. "The role of non-critical business and telework propensity in international stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Huang, Shoujun & Liu, Hezhe, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19 on stock price crash risk: Evidence from Chinese energy firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Gofran, Ruhana Zareen & Gregoriou, Andros & Haar, Lawrence, 2022. "Impact of Coronavirus on liquidity in financial markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Roddy Allan & Ervi Liusman & Teddy Lu & Desmond Tsang, 2021. "The COVID-19 Pandemic and Commercial Property Rent Dynamics," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Dionysia Dionysiou, 2015. "Choosing Among Alternative Long-Run Event-Study Techniques," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 158-198, February.
    15. Gao, Haoyu & Wen, Huiyu & Wang, Xingjian, 2022. "Pandemic effect on corporate financial asset holdings: Precautionary or return-chasing?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Zhong, Meirui & Zhang, Rui & Ren, Xiaohang, 2023. "The time-varying effects of liquidity and market efficiency of the European Union carbon market: Evidence from the TVP-SVAR-SV approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    17. Lof, Matthijs & van Bommel, Jos, 2023. "Asymmetric information and the distribution of trading volume," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Yousaf, Imran & Beljid, Makram & Chaibi, Anis & Ajlouni, Ahmed AL, 2022. "Do volatility spillover and hedging among GCC stock markets and global factors vary from normal to turbulent periods? Evidence from the global financial crisis and Covid-19 pandemic crisis," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    19. Wang, Zijun & Qian, Yan & Wang, Shiwen, 2018. "Dynamic trading volume and stock return relation: Does it hold out of sample?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 195-210.
    20. Bai, Chenjiang & Duan, Yuejiao & Liu, Congya & Qiu, Leiju, 2022. "International taxation sentiment and COVID-19 crisis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pandemic; Malaysia; market strength; information asymmetry; event study; vulnerable industries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F01 - International Economics - - General - - - Global Outlook
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Capital Market Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.