IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A piaci likviditás és a szabályozás kapcsolatának vizsgálata általános egyensúlyelméleti modellkeretben
[The effect of regulation on market liquidity: a general equilibrium approach]

Author

Listed:
  • Hevér, Judit

Abstract

A pénzügyi válságok következményeként az elmúlt évtizedben középpontba került a szabályozás kérdése. A gyakorlatban szerzett tapasztalat és az elméleti modellek azt mutatják, hogy a likviditási kockázat és a túlzott kockázatvállalás csökkentése érdekében bevezetett szabályozói lépések hatására a piaci szereplők módosítják befektetési döntéseiket, sőt a szabályozói előírás visszahat a piaci likviditásra. Tranzakciós költséggel (eladási és vételi ár közötti árréssel) bővített általános egyensúlyelméleti modellt alkalmazunk a különböző eszközök likviditása és a bevezetett szabályozói előírás közötti kapcsolat vizsgálatához. A modellben a szabályozás hatására nő az árrés (a piaci likviditás csökkenésének mutatója), ami visszafogja a piaci szereplők közötti kereskedést és kockázatmegosztást. Egyensúlyban a piaci szereplők fogyasztási profilja kockázatosabb marad, alacsonyabb hasznossági szintet érnek el.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: G11.

Suggested Citation

  • Hevér, Judit, 2020. "A piaci likviditás és a szabályozás kapcsolatának vizsgálata általános egyensúlyelméleti modellkeretben [The effect of regulation on market liquidity: a general equilibrium approach]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 708-733.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1915
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2020.7-8.708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1915
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2020.7-8.708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Csóka, Péter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques, 2014. "Risk allocation under liquidity constraints," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-9.
    2. John Y. Campbell, 2016. "Restoring Rational Choice: The Challenge of Consumer Financial Regulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 1-30, May.
    3. P. Jean‐Jacques Herings & Yu Zhou, 2022. "Competitive Equilibria In Matching Models With Financial Constraints," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(2), pages 777-802, May.
    4. Csoka, Peter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Koczy, Laszlo A., 2007. "Coherent measures of risk from a general equilibrium perspective," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 2517-2534, August.
    5. Lasse Heje Pedersen & Mark Mitchell & Todd Pulvino, 2007. "Slow Moving Capital," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(2), pages 215-220, May.
    6. Csóka, Péter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Kóczy, László Á., 2009. "Stable allocations of risk," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 266-276, September.
    7. Kamila Sommer & Paul Sullivan, 2018. "Implications of US Tax Policy for House Prices, Rents, and Homeownership," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(2), pages 241-274, February.
    8. Saki Bigio, 2015. "Endogenous Liquidity and the Business Cycle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(6), pages 1883-1927, June.
    9. Denis Gromb & Dimitri Vayanos, 2010. "A Model of Financial Market Liquidity Based on Intermediary Capital," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 8(2-3), pages 456-466, 04-05.
    10. Begenau, Juliane, 2019. "Capital Requirements, Risk Choice, and Liquidity Provision in a Business Cycle Model," Research Papers 3554, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    11. Castellano, Rosella & Cerqueti, Roy, 2011. "The optimal bid/ask spread in a Specialist System," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 2247-2253, September.
    12. Brounen, Dirk & Koedijk, Kees G. & Pownall, Rachel A.J., 2016. "Household financial planning and savings behavior," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 95-107.
    13. Nobuhiro Kiyotaki & John Moore, 2019. "Liquidity, Business Cycles, and Monetary Policy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 2926-2966.
    14. LeRoy,Stephen F. & Werner,Jan, 2014. "Principles of Financial Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107024120, February.
    15. Carlo Acerbi & Giacomo Scandolo, 2008. "Liquidity risk theory and coherent measures of risk," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(7), pages 681-692.
    16. Zalai, Ernő, 1998. "Általános egyensúlyi modellek alkalmazása gazdaságpolitikai elemzésekre [Application of general equilibrium models to economic policy analyses]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1065-1081.
    17. Stolper, Oscar, 2018. "It takes two to Tango: Households’ response to financial advice and the role of financial literacy," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 295-310.
    18. Csóka, Péter, 2017. "Fair risk allocation in illiquid markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 228-234.
    19. Gianni De Nicolò & Andrea Gamba & Marcella Lucchetta, 2014. "Microprudential Regulation in a Dynamic Model of Banking," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(7), pages 2097-2138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Judit Hevér & Péter Csóka, 2023. "The effect of funding liquidity regulation and ESG promotion on market liquidity," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2307, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    2. Peter Csoka & Judit Hever, 2023. "The Effect of Regulatory Requirements and ESG Promotion on Market Liquidity," MNB Working Papers 2023/1, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary).
    3. Balog, Dóra & Bátyi, Tamás László & Csóka, Péter & Pintér, Miklós, 2017. "Properties and comparison of risk capital allocation methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 614-625.
    4. Csóka Péter & Pintér Miklós, 2016. "On the Impossibility of Fair Risk Allocation," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 143-158, January.
    5. Saki Bigio & Adrien d'Avernas, 2021. "Financial Risk Capacity," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 142-181, October.
    6. Hevér, Judit, 2017. "A likviditás és a permanens árhatás szerepe a portfólióértékelésben [The role of liquidity policy and permanent price impact in portfolio valuation]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 594-611.
    7. Csóka, Péter & Bátyi, Tamás László & Pintér, Miklós & Balog, Dóra, 2011. "Tőkeallokációs módszerek és tulajdonságaik a gyakorlatban [Methods of capital allocation and their characteristics in practice]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 619-632.
    8. Csóka, Péter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques, 2014. "Risk allocation under liquidity constraints," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-9.
    9. Csóka, Péter & Hevér, Judit, 2018. "Portfolio valuation under liquidity constraints with permanent price impact," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 235-241.
    10. Dóra Balog & Tamás László Bátyi & Péter Csóka & Miklós Pintér, 2014. "Properties of risk capital allocation methods: Core Compatibility, Equal Treatment Property and Strong Monotonicity," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1417, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    11. Mendicino, Caterina & Nikolov, Kalin & Ramirez, Juan-Rubio & Suarez, Javier & Supera, Dominik, 2020. "Twin defaults and bank capital requirements," Working Paper Series 2414, European Central Bank.
    12. Csóka, Péter, 2017. "Fair risk allocation in illiquid markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 228-234.
    13. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Smilgins, Aleksandrs, 2016. "Risk capital allocation with autonomous subunits: The Lorenz set," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 151-157.
    14. Cun, Wukuang, 2022. "Endogenous lemons markets and information cycles," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Werner, Maximilian, 2023. "Occasionally binding liquidity constraints and macroeconomic dynamics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    16. Caterina Mendicino & Kalin Nikolov & Juan Rubio-Ramirez & Javier Suarez, 2020. "Twin Default Crises," Working Papers 2020-01, FEDEA.
    17. Vayanos, Dimitri & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Market Liquidity—Theory and Empirical Evidence ," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1289-1361, Elsevier.
    18. Kountzakis, C. & Polyrakis, I.A., 2013. "Coherent risk measures in general economic models and price bubbles," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 201-209.
    19. Toshiaki Ogawa, 2020. "Welfare Implications of Bank Capital Requirements under Dynamic Default Decisions," IMES Discussion Paper Series 20-E-03, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
    20. Fang, Xiang & Jutrsa, David & Peria, Soledad Martinez & Presbitero, Andrea F. & Ratnovski, Lev, 2022. "Bank capital requirements and lending in emerging markets: The role of bank characteristics and economic conditions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.