IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Liquidity risk theory and coherent measures of risk

Listed author(s):
  • Carlo Acerbi
  • Giacomo Scandolo

We discuss liquidity risk from a pure risk-theoretical point of view in the axiomatic context of coherent measures of risk. We propose a formalism for liquidity risk that is compatible with the axioms of coherency. We emphasize the difference between 'coherent risk measures' (CRM) ρ(X ) defined on portfolio values X as opposed to 'coherent portfolio risk measures' (CPRM) ρ(p) defined on the vector space of portfolios p, and we observe that in the presence of liquidity risk the value function on the space of portfolios is no longer necessarily linear. We propose a new nonlinear 'Value' function VL(p) that depends on a new notion of 'liquidity policy' L. The function VL(p) naturally arises from a general description of the impact that the microstructure of illiquid markets has when marking a portfolio to market. We discuss the consequences of the introduction of the function VL(p) in the coherency axioms and we study the properties induced on CPRMs. We show in particular that CPRMs are convex, finding a result that was proposed as a new axiom in the literature of so called 'convex measures of risk'. The framework we propose is not a model but rather a new formalism, in the sense that it is completely free from hypotheses on the dynamics of the market. We provide interpretation and characterization of the formalism as well as some stylized examples.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Quantitative Finance.

Volume (Year): 8 (2008)
Issue (Month): 7 ()
Pages: 681-692

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:8:y:2008:i:7:p:681-692
DOI: 10.1080/14697680802373975
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:8:y:2008:i:7:p:681-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.