IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v89y2020i3d10.1007_s11238-020-09760-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correction to: Effect of reduced opportunities on bargaining outcomes: an experiment with status asymmetries

Author

Listed:
  • Subrato Banerjee

    (Queensland University of Technology Business School (Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society and Technology)
    University of Melbourne (Australia India Institute))

Abstract

Part of the equation in sub-section “Key findings” is missing in the original publication of the article. The error was caused by the fact that the equation, due to its length, exceeded the page width. The missing part of the equation is given below:

Suggested Citation

  • Subrato Banerjee, 2020. "Correction to: Effect of reduced opportunities on bargaining outcomes: an experiment with status asymmetries," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 347-347, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:89:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-020-09760-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11238-020-09760-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-020-09760-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11238-020-09760-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Banerjee, Subrato, 2020. "Sample sizes in experimental games," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 221-227.
    2. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:89:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-020-09760-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.