IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v23y2012i3p905-916.html

A new C-OAR-SE-based content-valid and predictively valid measure that distinguishes brand love from brand liking

Author

Listed:
  • John Rossiter

Abstract

This article provides a new, C-OAR-SE-based, contrastive measure that distinguishes “brand love” from “brand liking.” The new measure is tested in an empirical study conducted among German university students about brands of products that they buy in four diverse product categories. From a consumer perspective, the incidence of consumers who have a loved brand in the category was found to be only 17 % for laundry detergent, 18 % for coffee, and 26 % for computers, peaking at 45 % in the fashion clothing category — findings that suggest that over half of young consumers do not acquire the state of brand love. Turning alternatively to a brand perspective, the findings indicate that, in general, about one in four of the brand’s customers will come to love the brand. Loving the brand, versus merely liking it, clearly pays off behaviorally — thereby demonstrating very good predictive validity for the new contrastive measure. Brand purchase or usage rate and brand recommendations were found to be approximately doubled for those who love the brand in comparison with those who merely like it. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Suggested Citation

  • John Rossiter, 2012. "A new C-OAR-SE-based content-valid and predictively valid measure that distinguishes brand love from brand liking," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 905-916, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:905-916
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-012-9173-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11002-012-9173-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-012-9173-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher P. Blocker & Mark B. Houston & Daniel J. Flint, 2012. "Unpacking What a "Relationship" Means to Commercial Buyers: How the Relationship Metaphor Creates Tension and Obscures Experience," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(5), pages 886-908.
    2. Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    3. Yi-Wen Chien & Duane T. Wegener & Chung-Chiang Hsiao & Richard E. Petty, 2010. "Dimensional Range Overlap and Context Effects in Consumer Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(3), pages 530-542, October.
    4. Barbara Carroll & Aaron Ahuvia, 2006. "Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 79-89, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Rahida Abd Rahman & Azleen Ilias, 2025. "Analysis of Brand Love on English Football Teams," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 2576-2593, January.
    3. Uddin, Mohiy & Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed, 2026. "How Societal and Individual Diversity Affect Brand Equity of High Versus Low Involvement Products," EconStor Preprints 341074, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Anwar Sadat Shimul, 2022. "Brand attachment: a review and future research," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 400-419, July.
    5. Shir-Way Siew & Michael S. Minor & Reto Felix, 2018. "The influence of perceived strength of brand origin on willingness to pay more for luxury goods," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 591-605, November.
    6. Noor Hasmini Binti Abd Ghani & Mohammad Kashedul Wahab Tuhin, 2016. "Consumer Brand Relationships," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 950-957.
    7. Alvarez, Claudio & David, Meredith E. & George, Morris, 2023. "Types of Consumer-Brand Relationships: A systematic review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Hatice AYDIN, 2017. "Marka Guveni, Farkindaligi ve Benlik Imaj Uyumunun Marka Bagliligina Etkisinde Marka Askinin Aracilik Rolu," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 17(2), pages 281-294.
    9. Iivi Riivits-Arkonsuo & Anu Leppiman, 2015. "Young Consumers and their Brand Love," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(10), pages 33-44, Octomber.
    10. Ching-Wei Ho & Yu-Bing Wang, 2020. "Does Social Media Marketing and Brand Community Play the Role in Building a Sustainable Digital Business Strategy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Munyaradzi W. Nyadzayo & Civilai Leckie & Lester W. Johnson, 0. "The impact of relational drivers on customer brand engagement and brand outcomes," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    12. Slaton, Kelcie & Testa, Danielle & Bakhshian, Sonia & Fiore, Ann Marie, 2020. "The small, inventory free retail format: The impact on consumer-based brand equity and purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    13. Anbumathi, Rajendiran & Dorai, Sriram & Palaniappan, Umayal, 2023. "Evaluating the role of technology and non-technology factors influencing brand love in Online Food Delivery services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Chen, Ching-Fu & Phou, Sambath, 2013. "A closer look at destination: Image, personality, relationship and loyalty," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 269-278.
    15. Jeremy J. Sierra & Harry A. Taute, 2019. "Brand tribalism in technology and sport: determinants and outcomes," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 209-225, March.
    16. Young Joong Kim & Jung Sook Park & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2021. "Experiential Value, Satisfaction, Brand Love, and Brand Loyalty toward Robot Barista Coffee Shop: The Moderating Effect of Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Couder, Julien & Valette-Florence, Pierre, 2024. "How do customers experience terroir? An investigation of its ability to increase brand relationship quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    18. Swimberghe, Krist R. & Astakhova, Marina & Wooldridge, Barbara Ross, 2014. "A new dualistic approach to brand passion: Harmonious and obsessive," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2657-2665.
    19. Saikat Banerjee & Bibek Ray Chaudhuri, 2022. "Correction to: Brand love and party preference of young political consumers (voters)," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(3), pages 505-505, September.
    20. Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola & Ratneshwar, S. & Sen, Sankar, 2012. "Drivers of consumer–brand identification," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 406-418.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:905-916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.