Mortality Risk Perceptions: A Bayesian Reassessment
This paper uses a Bayesian learning model to assess the respective influence of different risk measurements on mortality risk perceptions. People form risk beliefs using several sources of information, including the actual population mean death risk level the discounted lost life expectancy, and the age-specific hazard rate considered by Benjamin and Dougan (1997). The appropriate criterion for judging the validity of risk perceptions is not the perfect information case, but rather whether people form their risk beliefs in a rational manner given a world of costly and limited risk information. Although the statistical results support the overall conclusion that the learning process is rational, the character of the learning process differs depending on the risk level. Risk-related variables are much better predictors of larger risks than of small risks which reflects the role of information costs and the benefits of learning about larger risks. Copyright 1997 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:15:y:1997:i:2:p:135-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)or (Rebekah McClure)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.