IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jinten/v21y2023i3d10.1007_s10843-023-00328-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategy integration, sustainable drivers of firm internationalization performance—Moderated by environmental uncertainty and firm capabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Bimbo Onaolapo Adejare

    (University of Minho)

  • Ekpenyong Ekpenyong Udofia

    (University of Lagos)

  • Gbemi Oladipo Olaore

    (Karabuk University)

Abstract

The global environmental uncertainty and the need for an organization to maximize profit and satisfy the interest of wider nonmarket groups/stakeholders in the host market propel and reinforce the need for strategic integration to achieve sustainable internationalization performance. The interest of this article is to examine the relative impact of market, nonmarket strategy, and strategy integration on the performance of medium and large organizations in Portugal. Furthermore, environmental uncertainty and firm capabilities were used as moderation to evaluate the performance implication of these strategy configurations on firm market advantage in the host country. Given the need to examine the relationship between the latent and measured variables in this study, structural equation models were used to test the stated hypotheses, while confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess the fitness of our model. Our findings revealed that strategy integration provides a more sustainable competitive performance than either market or nonmarket strategy when used separately, especially in highly regulated and standardized business contexts such as Portugal. Furthermore, our findings show that organization needs to design market-oriented strategies and select the types of nonmarket practices (lobbying, campaign contributions, etc.) that best fit and align with their overall corporate objectives without neglecting the host market environmental culture. Research on market and nonmarket integrations have long been overdue given its extensive proposition to firm sustainable performance in a foreign country. Our research shed light on the importance of strategy integration to combat the ever-changing dynamism of the business environment and the negative sentiment surrounding globalization and how a firm can successfully compete in an uncertain, highly regulated, and standardized market context.

Suggested Citation

  • Bimbo Onaolapo Adejare & Ekpenyong Ekpenyong Udofia & Gbemi Oladipo Olaore, 2023. "Strategy integration, sustainable drivers of firm internationalization performance—Moderated by environmental uncertainty and firm capabilities," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 301-328, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jinten:v:21:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10843-023-00328-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10843-023-00328-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10843-023-00328-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10843-023-00328-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean‐Philippe Bonardi, 2004. "Global and political strategies in deregulated industries: the asymmetric behaviors of former monopolies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 101-120, February.
    2. Magali A. Delmas & Maria J. Montes‐Sancho, 2010. "Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: symbolic and substantive cooperation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 575-601, June.
    3. Rasmus Lentz & Dale T. Mortensen, 2008. "An Empirical Model of Growth Through Product Innovation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(6), pages 1317-1373, November.
    4. Thomas Lawton & Steven Mcguire & Tazeeb Rajwani, 2013. "Corporate Political Activity : A Literature Review and Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-02312913, HAL.
    5. Jonathan P. Doh & Thomas Lawton & Tazeeb Rajwani, 2012. "Advancing Nonmarket Strategy Research : Institutional Perspectives in a Changing World," Post-Print hal-02276718, HAL.
    6. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & Sinziana Dorobantu & Aseem Kaul & Bennet Zelner, 2017. "Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 114-140, January.
    7. Jaepil Choi & Heli Wang, 2009. "Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 895-907, August.
    8. Hadani, Michael, 2012. "Institutional ownership monitoring and corporate political activity: Governance implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 944-950.
    9. Kim, Younsung, 2022. "Integrated market and nonmarket strategies: Empirical evidence from the S&P 500 firms’ climate strategies," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 57-78, March.
    10. Liu, Tsung-Chi & Chen, Yi-Jen, 2015. "Strategy orientation, product innovativeness, and new product performance," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 2-16, January.
    11. Harrison, Jeffrey S. & Wicks, Andrew C., 2013. "Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 97-124, January.
    12. van Kranenburg, Hans & Voinea, Cosmina Lelia, 2017. "Nonmarket strategies predictors for foreign firms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 82-92.
    13. Klaus E Meyer & Mike W Peng, 2016. "Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(1), pages 3-22, January.
    14. Hadani, Michael & Dahan, Nicolas M. & Doh, Jonathan P., 2015. "The CEO as chief political officer: Managerial discretion and corporate political activity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2330-2337.
    15. Vázquez-Maguirre, Mario & Hartmann, Andreas M., 2013. "Nonmarket strategies of media enterprises in the Mexican television industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1743-1749.
    16. Wang, Guangping & Dou, Wenyu & Zhu, Weichun & Zhou, Nan, 2015. "The effects of firm capabilities on external collaboration and performance: The moderating role of market turbulence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1928-1936.
    17. Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol, 2016. "The interconnections between bribery, political network, government supports, and their consequences on export performance of small and medium enterprises in Thailand [Las interconexiones entre sob," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 259-276, June.
    18. Du, Jialin & Bai, Tao & Chen, Stephen, 2019. "Integrating corporate social and corporate political strategies: Performance implications and institutional contingencies in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 299-316.
    19. Thomas Wrona & Corinna Sinzig, 2018. "Nonmarket strategy research: systematic literature review and future directions," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 253-317, February.
    20. Juelin Yin & Anusorn Singhapakdi & Yunzhou Du, 2016. "Causes and moderators of corporate social responsibility in China: The influence of personal values and institutional logics," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(3), pages 226-254, July.
    21. Wayne S. DeSarbo & C. Anthony Di Benedetto & Michael Song & Indrajit Sinha, 2005. "Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 47-74, January.
    22. Amy J. Hillman & Gerald D. Keim, 2001. "Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 125-139, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hamid Etemad, 2023. "The emerging new architecture in international entrepreneurship: Dynamic impacts of business models transformation favoring accelerated internationalization of smaller enterprises," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 271-300, September.
    2. Anas Hakeem & Nizar Raissi & Henda Matoussi, 2024. "Rationality and dynamism on entrepreneurial orientation to the pace of internationalization: The moderating role of environmental munificence," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 213-247, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Long Zhang & John A. Parnell & Chuanhui Xiong, 2021. "Market and Nonmarket Strategies (NMS) in China: Performance Payoffs in Turbulent Environments," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(5), pages 644-665, November.
    2. John A. Parnell, 2017. "Cronyism from the Perspective of the Firm: A Cross-National Assessment of Nonmarket Strategy," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 32(Fall 2017), pages 47-74.
    3. Shirodkar, Vikrant & Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Lawton, Thomas C., 2024. "MNE nonmarket strategy in a changing world: Complexities, varieties, and a values-based approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).
    4. Greiner, Michael & Kim, Jaemin & Cordon Thor, Jennifer, 2023. "Narcissistic CEOs and their corporate political activity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Greiner, Michael & Kim, Jaemin & Cordon Thor, Jennifer, 2023. "CEO values as antecedents to corporate political activity: An empirical exploration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Peprah, Augustine Awuah & Atarah, Bede Akorige & Kumodzie-Dussey, Makafui Kwame, 2024. "Nonmarket strategy and legitimacy in institutionally voided environments: The case of Jumia, an African e-commerce giant," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).
    7. Shantanu Banerjee & Sunil Venaik, 2018. "The Effect of Corporate Political Activity on MNC Subsidiary Legitimacy: An Institutional Perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 813-844, October.
    8. Anna-Lena Maier, 2021. "Political corporate social responsibility in authoritarian contexts," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 476-495, December.
    9. Ko, Guihan & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Appiah, Gloria & Larimo, Jorma, 2022. "Non-market strategies and building digital trust in sharing economy platforms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1).
    10. Donbesuur, Francis & Zahoor, Nadia & Al-Tabbaa, Omar & Adomako, Samuel & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2023. "On the performance of platform-based international new ventures: The roles of non-market strategies and managerial competencies," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    11. Andreia Borges & Nelson Ramalho, 2024. "A multi‐level model integrating corporate social responsibility and political activity in the European Union: What are the institutional implications for foreign companies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4265-4279, September.
    12. Chidlow, Agnieszka & Wang, Jue & Liu, Xiaohui & Wei, Yingqi, 2021. "A co-evolution perspective of EMNE internationalization and institutions: An integrative framework of 5Cs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    13. Manav Raj, 2021. "A house divided: Legislative competition and young firm survival in the United States," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(13), pages 2389-2419, December.
    14. Mujtaba Ahsan, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Ethics in the Sharing Economy: A Critical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 19-33, January.
    15. Yeongsu Anthony Kim, 2024. "Blue goes green: The impact of the chief executive officer and board of directors' political ideology on corporate environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 134-148, February.
    16. Jonas Puck & Thomas Lawton & Alexander Mohr, 2018. "The Corporate Political Activity of MNCs: Taking Stock and Moving Forward," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 663-673, October.
    17. Curchod, Corentin & Patriotta, Gerardo & Wright, Mike, 2020. "Self-categorization as a nonmarket strategy for MNE subsidiaries: Tracking the international expansion of an online platform," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).
    18. Peter Rodgers & Peter Stokes & Shlomo Tarba & Zaheer Khan, 2019. "The Role of Non-market Strategies in Establishing Legitimacy: The Case of Service MNEs in Emerging Economies," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 515-540, August.
    19. Woo, Donghyup & Suresh, Nallan C., 2022. "Voluntary agreements for sustainability, resource efficiency & firm performance under the supply chain cooperation policy in South Korea," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    20. Bucheli, Marcelo & DeBerge, Thomas, 2024. "Multinational enterprises’ nonmarket strategies: Insights from History," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jinten:v:21:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10843-023-00328-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.