IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v120y2014i2p189-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hostile Attribution Bias and Negative Reciprocity Beliefs Exacerbate Incivility’s Effects on Interpersonal Deviance

Author

Listed:
  • Long-Zeng Wu
  • Haina Zhang
  • Randy Chiu
  • Ho Kwan
  • Xiaogang He

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the moderating roles of hostile attribution bias and negative reciprocity beliefs in the relationship between workplace incivility, as perceived by employees, and their interpersonal deviance. Data were collected using a three-wave survey research design. Participants included 233 employees from a large manufacturing company in China. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to test the hypothesized relationships. Our study revealed that hostile attribution bias and negative reciprocity beliefs strengthened the positive relationship between workplace incivility and interpersonal deviance. This relationship was the most positive when both hostile attribution bias and negative reciprocity beliefs were high. The findings provided evidence that directing employees to depress hostile attribution bias and negative reciprocity beliefs may attenuate the effects of workplace incivility on interpersonal deviance. Implications for theory, research, and management practice are discussed. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Long-Zeng Wu & Haina Zhang & Randy Chiu & Ho Kwan & Xiaogang He, 2014. "Hostile Attribution Bias and Negative Reciprocity Beliefs Exacerbate Incivility’s Effects on Interpersonal Deviance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 189-199, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:120:y:2014:i:2:p:189-199
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1658-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-013-1658-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-013-1658-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thau, Stefan & Bennett, Rebecca J. & Mitchell, Marie S. & Marrs, Mary Beth, 2009. "How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 79-92, January.
    2. Michael Palanski, 2012. "Forgiveness and Reconciliation in the Workplace: A Multi-Level Perspective and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 275-287, September.
    3. Feng Wei & Steven Si, 2013. "Tit for tat? Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of locus of control and perceived mobility," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 281-296, March.
    4. Long‐Zeng Wu & Frederick Hong‐kit Yim & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2012. "Coping with Workplace Ostracism: The Roles of Ingratiation and Political Skill in Employee Psychological Distress," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 178-199, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gong, Xiushuang & Wang, Hanwen & Zhang, Xiadan & Tian, Hui, 2022. "Why does service inclusion matter? The effect of service exclusion on customer indirect misbehavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Ni, Dan & Liu, Xin & Zheng, Xiaoming, 2024. "Render good for evil? The relationship between customer mistreatment and customer-oriented citizenship behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Yijing Lyu & Long-Zeng Wu & Yijiao Ye & Ho Kwong Kwan & Yuanyi Chen, 2023. "Rebellion Under Exploitation: How and When Exploitative Leadership Evokes Employees’ Workplace Deviance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 483-498, July.
    4. Hua, Changhua & Zhao, Li & He, Qile & Chen, Ziguang, 2023. "When and how workplace ostracism leads to interpersonal deviance: The moderating effects of self-control and negative affect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Jeremy D. Mackey & John D. Bishoff & Shanna R. Daniels & Wayne A. Hochwarter & Gerald R. Ferris, 2019. "Incivility’s Relationship with Workplace Outcomes: Enactment as a Boundary Condition in Two Samples," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 513-528, March.
    6. Xing Wang & Tae-Yeol Kim & Hongli Li, 2024. "Why and for whom cyber incivility affects task performance? Exploring the intrapersonal processes and a personal boundary condition," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 615-640, June.
    7. Jeremy D. Mackey & Lei Huang & Wei He, 2020. "You Abuse and I Criticize: An Ego Depletion and Leader–Member Exchange Examination of Abusive Supervision and Destructive Voice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 579-591, July.
    8. Lages, Cristiana R. & Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Kadić-Maglajlić, Selma & Borghei-Razavi, Niloofar, 2023. "A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of the dark side of customer behavior: An integrative customer incivility framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Qiang Wang & Mei-Hua Lin & Anupama Narayan & Gary N. Burns & Nathan A. Bowling, 2022. "A cross-cultural examination of the relationships between job attitudes and workplace deviance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 249-272, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yucheng Zhang & Zhenyu Liao, 2015. "Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 959-987, December.
    2. Haesang Park & Jenny M. Hoobler & Junfeng Wu & Robert C. Liden & Jia Hu & Morgan S. Wilson, 2019. "Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 1113-1131, September.
    3. Donald H. Kluemper & Kevin W. Mossholder & Dan Ispas & Mark N. Bing & Dragos Iliescu & Alexandra Ilie, 2019. "When Core Self-Evaluations Influence Employees’ Deviant Reactions to Abusive Supervision: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Ability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 435-453, October.
    4. Orlando C. Richard & O. Dorian Boncoeur & Hao Chen & David L. Ford, 2020. "Supervisor Abuse Effects on Subordinate Turnover Intentions and Subsequent Interpersonal Aggression: The Role of Power-Distance Orientation and Perceived Human Resource Support Climate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 549-563, July.
    5. Wu, Chia-Huei & Liu, Jun & Kwong Kwan, Ho & Lee, Cynthia, 2016. "Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: an organizational identification perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64006, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Tahira Rasheed & Arshad Zaheer & Sadaf Manzoor, 2021. "Do Narcissists Tend to Reduce Interpersonal Conflicts in Organizations? The Effects of Abusive Supervision on Ostracism and Interpersonal Conflicts," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(6), pages 43-58.
    7. Anya Johnson & Shanta Dey & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Sadhbh Joyce & Leona Tan & Nicholas Glozier & Samuel B Harvey, 2020. "A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 402-424, August.
    8. Lance Ferris, D. & Fatimah, Shereen & Yan, Ming & Liang, Lindie H. & Lian, Huiwen & Brown, Douglas J., 2019. "Being sensitive to positives has its negatives: An approach/avoidance perspective on reactivity to ostracism," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 138-149.
    9. Jinqiang Zhu & Shiyong Xu & Kan Ouyang & David Herst & Elaine Farndale, 2018. "Ethical leadership and employee pro-social rule-breaking behavior in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 59-81, February.
    10. Long-Zeng Wu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Li-Qun Wei & Jun Liu, 2013. "Ingratiation in the Workplace: The Role of Subordinate and Supervisor Political Skill," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(6), pages 991-1017, September.
    11. Robert Cialdini & Yexin Jessica Li & Adriana Samper & Ned Wellman, 2021. "How Bad Apples Promote Bad Barrels: Unethical Leader Behavior and the Selective Attrition Effect," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 861-880, February.
    12. Jie Xin & Shouming Chen & Ho Kwong Kwan & Randy K. Chiu & Frederick Hong-kit Yim, 2018. "Work–Family Spillover and Crossover Effects of Sexual Harassment: The Moderating Role of Work–Home Segmentation Preference," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 619-629, February.
    13. Gang Wang & Peter Harms & Jeremy Mackey, 2015. "Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 487-503, October.
    14. Yuntao Bai & Lili Lu & Li Lin-Schilstra, 2022. "Auxiliaries to Abusive Supervisors: The Spillover Effects of Peer Mistreatment on Employee Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 219-237, June.
    15. Mario Bogdanovic & Ladislav Tyll, 2016. "Attitude of Management Students towards Whistleblowing: Evidence from Croatia," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(1), pages 45-61.
    16. Giova Wulandari & Muafi Muafi, 2021. "The effect of self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behavior toward knowledge sharing:The mediation role of abusive supervision," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 128-138, June.
    17. Mario Bogdanović, 2023. "Destructive Organizational Communication And Manipulation: Emergent Forms, Consequences And Coping In The Function Of Smarter Organizational Solutions," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 18(1), pages 65-84, March.
    18. Neves, Pedro & Champion, Stephen, 2015. "Core self-evaluations and workplace deviance: The role of resources and self-regulation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 381-391.
    19. Cathy Sheehan & Helen De Cieri & Brian K Cooper & Robert Brooks, 2016. "The impact of HR political skill in the HRM and organisational performance relationship," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(1), pages 161-181, February.
    20. Joon Hyung Park & Min Z. Carter & Richard S. DeFrank & Qianwen Deng, 2018. "Abusive Supervision, Psychological Distress, and Silence: The Effects of Gender Dissimilarity Between Supervisors and Subordinates," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 775-792, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:120:y:2014:i:2:p:189-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.