IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v10y2021i4p128-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behavior toward knowledge sharing:The mediation role of abusive supervision

Author

Listed:
  • Giova Wulandari

    (Master of Management, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia)

  • Muafi Muafi

    (Management Department, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia)

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine and analyze Self-Efficacy and Organizational Citizenship Behavior against Knowledge Sharing mediated by Abusive Supervision. The research was conducted in securities companies that are members of the Indonesia Stock Exchange located in Central Java and Yogyakarta with a sample size of 100 respondents, using quantitative methods. The data collection technique by using a questionnaire that is distributed via a google form. Statistical techniques use SEM (structural Equation Modeling) with the help of SMART PLS software. The research results found ; (i) there is a significant negative influence between Self-Efficacy on Abusive Supervision, (ii) there is a significant negative effect between Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Abusive Supervision, (iii) there is a negative and significant influence between Abusive Supervision on Knowledge Sharing, (iv) there is a positive and significant influence between Self-Efficacy on Knowledge Sharing through Abusive Supervision, (vi) there is a positive and significant influence between Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Knowledge Sharing through Abusive Supervision of employees of securities companies members of the Indonesia Stock Exchange located in Central Java and DIY. Key Words:Self-Efficacy, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Abusive Supervision, Knowledge Sharing

Suggested Citation

  • Giova Wulandari & Muafi Muafi, 2021. "The effect of self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behavior toward knowledge sharing:The mediation role of abusive supervision," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 128-138, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:128-138
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1168/892
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1168
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thau, Stefan & Bennett, Rebecca J. & Mitchell, Marie S. & Marrs, Mary Beth, 2009. "How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 79-92, January.
    2. Stijn Decoster & Jeroen Camps & Jeroen Stouten, 2014. "The mediating role of LMX between abusive supervision and work behaviors," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(1), pages 61-75, April.
    3. Hsiu‐Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 315-332, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej Zastempowski & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Krzysztof Krukowski & Szymon Cyfert, 2020. "Technological Innovation Capabilities of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 460-474.
    2. Lingyan Liu & Minghua Lin & Ming Yu, 2023. "Relationship of internal institutions, knowledge sharing, and technological innovation in characteristic cultural enterprises: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 515-524, January.
    3. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing among Employees in Organizations," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 8(1), pages 52-61, March.
    4. Wondifraw Mihret Dessie & Gojjam Ademe Mengistu & Tigist Abera Mulualem, 2022. "Communication and innovation in the performance of weaving and pottery crafts in Gojjam, Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Fındık, Derya & Beyhan, Berna, 2014. "A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Micro Level Evidence from Turkey," MPRA Paper 60961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Wei Daojiang & Li Huimin, 2014. "An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Knowledge Sharing in Project Context," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 154-169, April.
    7. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Nham Tuan Phong & Nguyen Tuyet-Mai & Tran Nam Hoai & Nguyen Hao Anh, 2020. "Knowledge sharing and innovation capability at both individual and organizational levels: An empirical study from Vietnam’s telecommunication companies," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 275-301, June.
    9. Sun, Xiuli & Li, Haizheng & Ghosal, Vivek, 2020. "Firm-level human capital and innovation: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    10. Ju Han Yeon & Seung-hwan Jang, 2023. "The Relation between Bio-Industry Performance and Innovation Capacity—Focusing on the Korean Bio-Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Gang Wang & Peter Harms & Jeremy Mackey, 2015. "Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 487-503, October.
    12. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-41, August.
    13. Stanley Kam Sing Wong, 2013. "Environmental Requirements, Knowledge Sharing and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Electronics Industry in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 321-338, July.
    14. Eugenie Byukusenge & John C. Munene, 2017. "Knowledge management and business performance: Does innovation matter?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1368434-136, January.
    15. Ahyar Yuniawan & Udin Udin, 2020. "The Influence of Knowledge Sharing, Affective Commitment, and Meaningful Work on Employee‘s Performance," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 72-82.
    16. Ra'ed (Moh'd Taisir) Masa'deh & Bader Yousef Obeidat & Diana Shawqi Zyod & Ala’a Hamdi Gharaibeh, 2015. "The Associations among Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, Job Performance, and Firm Performance: A Theoretical Model," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 4(2), pages 848-866, April.
    17. Moayyad AL-FAWAEER & Mousa KHAIREDDIN, 2020. "The Impact Of Quality Management(Qm) On Job Satisfaction Across Knowledge Sharing As A Moderating Variable In Greater Amman Governorate," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 7-16, July.
    18. Abdullah Almuqrin & Ibrahim Mutambik, 2021. "The explanatory power of social cognitive theory in determining knowledge sharing among Saudi faculty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Joon Hyung Park & Min Z. Carter & Richard S. DeFrank & Qianwen Deng, 2018. "Abusive Supervision, Psychological Distress, and Silence: The Effects of Gender Dissimilarity Between Supervisors and Subordinates," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 775-792, December.
    20. Joel Kiplagat Tuwey & Vincent Ngeno, 2019. "Does CEO Traits Influence Innovation? Evidence from the Kenya Banking Sector," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 98-106.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:128-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.