IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7116-d1131478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relation between Bio-Industry Performance and Innovation Capacity—Focusing on the Korean Bio-Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ju Han Yeon

    (Department of Technology Practical Convergence, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea)

  • Seung-hwan Jang

    (School of Science and Technology Innovation, Pusan National University, Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan 43241, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

After the COVID-19 pandemic, the bio-industry is becoming increasingly important. Therefore, it is necessary to respond to the changed environment after COVID-19 by analyzing the bio-industry situation before the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, Korean bio-industry is a very important industry for Korea’s economic growth, so huge investments are being made in the development of bio-companies. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the effect of innovation capabilities on the performance of the Korean bio-industry. Korea’s bio-industry has been developing under the leadership of the government. Thus, Korea’s bio-companies need various forms of innovation to achieve sustainability through competitive advantage on their own. The objective of this research is to find the competitive advantage factors that improve the innovation ability of the Korean bio-industry. Therefore, the elements that increase a company’s innovation capability were studied in order to uncover competitive advantage factors that improve the Korean bio-industry’s innovation capability, and the effect on corporate performance was analyzed. Using samples from the ‘Korean Bio-industry Survey’, the current state of the Korean bio-industry was examined through a review of all bio-industry enterprises. In addition, each of the eight bio-industries was examined using Korea’s industrial classification system. As an analysis method, multiple regression analysis of SPSS 25 was performed to analyze how the six input factors have a complex effect on the output factor. This study discovered that R&D intensity, machine investment, and human resource characteristics all had an impact on the business performance of Korean biotech enterprises. In eight bio-sectors, elements affecting company success were defined differently. Therefore, through this study, Korean bio-companies must understand their own industrial characteristics, and develop factors that affect business performance through strategic operational management. In addition, based on the results of this study, companies should strengthen the innovation capabilities of the bio-industry to survive post-COVID-19, analyze changes in innovation capabilities, and promote sustainable growth by strengthening key innovation factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ju Han Yeon & Seung-hwan Jang, 2023. "The Relation between Bio-Industry Performance and Innovation Capacity—Focusing on the Korean Bio-Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7116-:d:1131478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Man Chen & Zhi Yang & Wenyu Dou & Feng Wang, 2018. "Flying or dying? Organizational change, customer participation, and innovation ambidexterity in emerging economies," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 97-119, March.
    2. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi, 2020. "How does customer and supplier cooperation in micro-enterprises affect innovation? Evidence from Pakistani handicraft micro-enterprises," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(5), pages 530-559, November.
    3. Paulo Antônio Zawislak & Edi Madalena Fracasso & Jorge Tello-Gamarra, 2018. "Technological intensity and innovation capability in industrial firms," Innovation & Management Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(2), pages 189-207, July.
    4. Louise Staffas & Mathias Gustavsson & Kes McCormick, 2013. "Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Audretsch, David B. & Belitski, Maksim, 2020. "The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and productivity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Bronwyn H. Hall & Francesca Lotti & Jacques Mairesse, 2013. "Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 300-328, April.
    7. Rasiah, Rajah & Shahrivar, Rafat Beigpoor & Yap, Xiao-Shan, 2016. "Institutional support, innovation capabilities and exports: Evidence from the semiconductor industry in Taiwan," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 69-75.
    8. Jian Xu & Jae-Woo Sim, 2018. "Characteristics of Corporate R&D Investment in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Manufacturing Industry in China and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Minna Saunila, 2016. "Performance measurement approach for innovation capability in SMEs," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(2), pages 162-176, February.
    10. Gunday, Gurhan & Ulusoy, Gunduz & Kilic, Kemal & Alpkan, Lutfihak, 2011. "Effects of innovation types on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 662-676, October.
    11. Danny Samson & Marianne Gloet & Prakash Singh, 2017. "Systematic Innovation Capability: Evidence From Case Studies And A Large Survey," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-43, October.
    12. Kobarg, Sebastian & Stumpf-Wollersheim, Jutta & Welpe, Isabell M., 2019. "More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 1-10.
    13. Yam, Richard C.M. & Lo, William & Tang, Esther P.Y. & Lau, Antonio K.W., 2011. "Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 391-402, April.
    14. Hsiu-Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(1), pages 315 - 332, April.
    15. Marianne Gloet & Danny Samson, 2016. "Knowledge Management and Systematic Innovation Capability," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 54-72, April.
    16. Hsiu‐Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 315-332, June.
    17. Minna Saunila, 2016. "Performance measurement approach for innovation capability in SMEs," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(2), pages 162-176, February.
    18. Thomas Dietz & Jan Börner & Jan Janosch Förster & Joachim Von Braun, 2018. "Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Hsiu‐Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 315-332, June.
    20. Forsman, Helena, 2011. "Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 739-750, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daronco, Everaldo Luis & Silva, Diego S. & Seibel, Martina Konzen & Cortimiglia, Marcelo Nogueira, 2023. "A new framework of firm-level innovation capability: A propensity–ability perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 236-250.
    2. Maciej Zastempowski & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Krzysztof Krukowski & Szymon Cyfert, 2020. "Technological Innovation Capabilities of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 460-474.
    3. Wendy Anzules-Falcones & Sylvia Novillo-Villegas, 2023. "Innovation Capacity, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Flexibility: An Analysis from Industrial SMEs in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Wondifraw Mihret Dessie & Gojjam Ademe Mengistu & Tigist Abera Mulualem, 2022. "Communication and innovation in the performance of weaving and pottery crafts in Gojjam, Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Yin-Kuan Ng & Voon-Hsien Lee & Alex Tun-Lee Foo & Pei-Lee Gan, 2012. "The Relationship between Knowledge Management Practices and Technological Innovation: A Conceptual Framework," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, ToKnowPress, vol. 1(1), pages 71-89.
    7. Armand Djoumessi & Shu-Ling Chen & Stephen Cahoon, 2019. "Deconstructing Lawson And Samson’S Concept Of Innovation Capability: A Critical Assessment And A Refinement," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-31, August.
    8. Nawal Abdalla Adam & Hind Alofaysan, 2023. "External Knowledge Flows and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ Innovation Capabilities Enhancement: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Fathi Abdulsalam Mohammed Alsoukini & Muri Wole Adedokun & Ayşen Berberoğlu, 2025. "Enhancing Sustainable Innovation Performance in the Banking Sector of Libya: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Applications and Organizational Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Muhammad Zafar Yaqub & Abdullah Alsabban, 2023. "Knowledge Sharing through Social Media Platforms in the Silicon Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Lorenzo Revuelto-Taboada & Alexandra Portalanza-Chavarría & Fernando Cedeño-Alejandro, 2023. "Promoting intrapreneurial behavior in banking: the role of high-performance work systems, knowledge management processes, and supervisor support," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(3), pages 789-817, September.
    12. Fizza Ishaq & Xiangsheng Dou & Muhammad Qasim & Ansar Abbass, 2025. "Navigating Green Innovation and Key Determinants of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Pakistan," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11979-12010, September.
    13. Rosalia Castellano & Gaetano Musella & Gennaro Punzo, 2023. "Does context matter? Exploring the effects of productive structures on the relationship between innovation and workforce skills’ complementarity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1991-2011, June.
    14. Jiang, Weijie & Yu, Hui, 2025. "Confucian culture and corporate innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. McLaren, Julie & Kattel, Rainer, 2025. "Policy capacities for mission-oriented innovation policy: A case study of UKRI and the industrial strategy challenge fund," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    16. Mojtaba Rezaei & Razieh Sadraei & Vahid Jafari-Sadeghi & Demetris Vrontis, 2025. "Knowledge is of no value unless to be shared. A synthesis of knowledge-sharing drivers in born-globals," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 1131-1161, June.
    17. Bianica Pires & Joshua Goldstein & Emily Molfino & Kathryn Ziemer & Mark Orr & José Jiménez, 2024. "Knowledge sharing in a dynamic, multi-level organization: an agent-based modeling approach," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 75-100, March.
    18. Pantea Foroudi, 2023. "Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Marketing Assets: Developing the Marketing Assets, Communication Focus, and Capability Nexus," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 203-222, August.
    19. Alexandra Portalanza-Chavarría & Lorenzo Revuelto-Taboada, 2023. "Driving intrapreneurial behavior through high-performance work systems," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 897-921, June.
    20. Foroudi, Pantea & Gupta, Suraksha & Patel, Parth & Batsakis, Georgios & Vaatanen, Juha & Czinkota, Michael, 2023. "The effect of home country characteristics on the internationalization of EMNEs: The moderating role of knowledge stock," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7116-:d:1131478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.