IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ijhcfe/v18y2018i4d10.1007_s10754-018-9238-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural–urban disparities in the utilization of mental health inpatient services in China: the role of health insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Junfang Xu

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Jian Wang

    (Shandong University)

  • Madeleine King

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Ruiyun Liu

    (Shandong Center for Mental Health)

  • Fenghua Yu

    (Shandong Health and Family Planning Commission)

  • Jinshui Xing

    (Shandong Center for Mental Health)

  • Lei Su

    (Shandong Center for Mental Health)

  • Mingshan Lu

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

Reducing rural–urban disparities in health and health care has been a key policy goal for the Chinese government. With mental health becoming an increasingly significant public health issue in China, empirical evidence of disparities in the use of mental health services can guide steps to reduce them. We conducted this study to inform China’s on-going health-care reform through examining how health insurance might reduce rural–urban disparities in the utilization of mental health inpatient services in China. This retrospective study used 10 years (2005–2014) of hospital electronic health records from the Shandong Center for Mental Health and the DaiZhuang Psychiatric Hospital, two major psychiatric hospitals in Shandong Province. Health insurance was measured using types of health insurance and the actual reimbursement ratio (RR). Utilization of mental health inpatient services was measured by hospitalization cost, length of stay (LOS), and frequency of hospitalization. We examined rural–urban disparities in the use of mental health services, as well as the role of health insurance in reducing such disparities. Hospitalization costs, LOS, and frequency of hospitalization were all found to be lower among rural than among urban inpatients. Having health insurance and benefiting from a relatively high RR were found to be significantly associated with a greater utilization of inpatient services, among both urban and rural residents. In addition, an increase in the RR was found to be significantly associated with an increase in the use of mental health services among rural patients. Consistent with the existing literature, our study suggests that increasing insurance schemes’ reimbursement levels could lead to substantial increases in the use of mental health inpatient services among rural patients, and a reduction in rural–urban disparities in service utilization. In order to promote mental health care and reduce rural–urban disparities in its utilization in China, improving rural health insurance coverage (e.g., reducing the coinsurance rate) would be a powerful policy instrument.

Suggested Citation

  • Junfang Xu & Jian Wang & Madeleine King & Ruiyun Liu & Fenghua Yu & Jinshui Xing & Lei Su & Mingshan Lu, 2018. "Rural–urban disparities in the utilization of mental health inpatient services in China: the role of health insurance," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 377-393, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:18:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10754-018-9238-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10754-018-9238-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10754-018-9238-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10754-018-9238-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagstaff, Adam & Lindelow, Magnus & Jun, Gao & Ling, Xu & Juncheng, Qian, 2009. "Extending health insurance to the rural population: An impact evaluation of China's new cooperative medical scheme," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. van Doorslaer, Eddy & Wagstaff, Adam, 1992. "Equity in the delivery of health care: some international comparisons," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 389-411, December.
    3. Xiaoyan Lei & Wanchuan Lin, 2009. "The New Cooperative Medical Scheme in rural China: does more coverage mean more service and better health?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(S2), pages 25-46, July.
    4. Wagstaff, Adam & Lindelow, Magnus, 2008. "Can insurance increase financial risk?: The curious case of health insurance in China," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 990-1005, July.
    5. Wagstaff, Adam & van Doorslaer, Eddy, 1992. "Equity in the finance of health care: Some international comparisons," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 361-387, December.
    6. Weathers, Robert R. & Stegman, Michelle, 2012. "The effect of expanding access to health insurance on the health and mortality of Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 863-875.
    7. Suwei Yuan & Yan Liu & Na Li & Yunting Zhang & Zhe Zhang & Jingjing Tao & Lizheng Shi & Hude Quan & Mingshan Lu & Jin Ma, 2014. "Impacts of Health Insurance Benefit Design on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Use and Inpatient Costs among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in Shanghai, China," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 265-275, March.
    8. Li, Xin & Zhang, Wei, 2013. "The impacts of health insurance on health care utilization among the older people in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 59-65.
    9. Zhongliang Zhou & Jianmin Gao & Qinxiang Xue & Xiaowei Yang & Ju'e Yan, 2009. "Effects of Rural Mutual Health Care on outpatient service utilization in Chinese village medical institutions: evidence from panel data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(S2), pages 129-136, July.
    10. Mojtabai, R., 2005. "Trends in contacts with mental health professionals and cost barriers to mental health care among adults with significant psychological distress in the United States: 1997-2002," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(11), pages 2009-2014.
    11. Yu Wang & Yan Jiang & Yang Li & Xiaojun Wang & Chi Ma & Shuangge Ma, 2013. "Health Insurance Utilization and Its Impact: Observations from the Middle-Aged and Elderly in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Liu, Hong & Sun, Qi & Zhao, Zhong, 2014. "Social learning and health insurance enrollment: Evidence from China's New Cooperative Medical Scheme," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 84-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Wen, 2023. "Social medical insurance integration and health care disparities in China: Evidence from an administrative claim dataset," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 20-39.
    2. Chengxu Long & Ruoxi Wang & Da Feng & Lu Ji & Zhanchun Feng & Shangfeng Tang, 2020. "Social Support and Health Services Use in People Aged over 65 Years Migrating within China: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Shi, Xuezhu, 2020. "Locked out? China’s health insurance scheme and internal migration," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Qiuming & Wang, Derek, 2021. "Hospital efficiency and equity in health care delivery: A study based in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Zhang, Anwen & Nikoloski, Zlatko & Mossialos, Elias, 2017. "Does health insurance reduce out-of-pocket expenditure? Heterogeneity among China's middle-aged and elderly," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 11-19.
    3. Liu, Hong & Zhao, Zhong, 2014. "Does health insurance matter? Evidence from China’s urban resident basic medical insurance," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 1007-1020.
    4. Feng, Jin & Song, Hong & Wang, Zhen, 2020. "The elderly's response to a patient cost-sharing policy in health insurance: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 189-207.
    5. Hai Zhong, 2011. "Effect of patient reimbursement method on health‐care utilization: evidence from China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(11), pages 1312-1329, November.
    6. Timothy Powell‐Jackson & Winnie Chi‐Man Yip & Wei Han, 2015. "Realigning Demand and Supply Side Incentives to Improve Primary Health Care Seeking in Rural China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(6), pages 755-772, June.
    7. Kuangnan Fang & BenChang Shia & Shuangge Ma, 2012. "Health Insurance Coverage and Impact: A Survey in Three Cities in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-8, June.
    8. Qin Zhou & Gordon G. Liu & Sam Krumholz, 2017. "Is Chinese National Health Insurance Effective in the Face of Severe Illness? A Perspective from Health Service Utilization and Economic Burden," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 1307-1329, July.
    9. Zhiyuan Hou & Ellen Van de Poel & Eddy Van Doorslaer & Baorong Yu & Qingyue Meng, 2014. "Effects Of Ncms On Access To Care And Financial Protection In China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(8), pages 917-934, August.
    10. Carine Milcent & Feng Jin, 2010. "Decrease in the healthcare demand in rural China: A side effect of the industrialization process?," PSE Working Papers halshs-00564848, HAL.
    11. Lin, Lin & Zai, Xianhua, 2022. "The Power of Public Insurance With Limited Benefits: Evidence from China's New Cooperative Medical Scheme," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1180, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Jing You, 2016. "Lending to Parents and Insuring Children: Is There a Role for Microcredit in Complementing Health Insurance in Rural China?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(5), pages 543-558, May.
    13. Xiuxia Yin & Lucille Aba Abruquah & Ya Ding, 2019. "Dynamics of Life Satisfaction Among Rural Elderly in China: The Role of Health Insurance Policies and Intergenerational Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Jessica Ya Sun, 2020. "Welfare consequences of access to health insurance for rural households: Evidence from the New Cooperative Medical Scheme in China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 337-352, March.
    15. Li, Cheng & Yu, Xuan & Butler, James R.G. & Yiengprugsawan, Vasoontara & Yu, Min, 2011. "Moving towards universal health insurance in China: Performance, issues and lessons from Thailand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 359-366, August.
    16. Li, Xin & Zhang, Wei, 2013. "The impacts of health insurance on health care utilization among the older people in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 59-65.
    17. Liu, Dan & Tsegai, Daniel W., 2011. "The New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) and its implications for access to health care and medical expenditure: Evidence from rural China," Discussion Papers 116746, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    18. Carine Milcent, 2011. "Baisse du recours aux soins dans les zones rurales en Chine," Working Papers halshs-00653450, HAL.
    19. Fink, Günther & Robyn, Paul Jacob & Sié, Ali & Sauerborn, Rainer, 2013. "Does health insurance improve health?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1043-1056.
    20. Ali, Shehzad & Cookson, Richard & Dusheiko, Mark, 2017. "Addressing care-seeking as well as insurance-seeking selection biases in estimating the impact of health insurance on out-of-pocket expenditure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 127-140.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:18:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10754-018-9238-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.