Author
Listed:
- Abdelmounaim Hadjira
(University of Mustapha Ben Boulaid-Batna 2)
- Hicham Salhi
(University of Mustapha Ben Boulaid-Batna 2)
- Lyes Choubar
(Mohamed Boudiaf University)
Abstract
Forecasting oil prices is a crucial and formidable task due to its far-reaching implications on both economic and non-economic factors. The influence of various factors such as economic growth, political developments, and psychological sentiments adds significant uncertainty to oil price forecasts. Despite extensive research, there remains a lack of consensus among scholars regarding the most effective techniques and models for predicting oil prices. Therefore, it is imperative to develop forecasting methods that offer higher accuracy and lower error rates to address this challenge effectively. In this study, the OPEC basket price data from 01–2003 to 06–2022 was used to forecast oil prices using three forecasting methodologies: the Neural Network Autoregressive (NNAR) model (Soft-computing model), Fuzzy Time Series (FTS) (qualitative models), and the Prophet by Facebook model. The performance of the models in modeling and forecasting was evaluated by: Mean Error (ME), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The results of the study showed that the best model according to the previous criteria is Singh's model with: $$ME=0.268, MAE=2.801, RMSE=3.347, MAPE=4.708.$$ M E = 0.268 , M A E = 2.801 , R M S E = 3.347 , M A P E = 4.708 . the study contributes valuable insights to the field of oil price forecasting, paving the way for the adoption and implementation of Fuzzy Time Series models, particularly the Singh model, as indispensable tools in understanding and anticipating the dynamic behavior of oil markets.
Suggested Citation
Abdelmounaim Hadjira & Hicham Salhi & Lyes Choubar, 2025.
"OPEC Basket Monthly Crude Oil Price Forecasting: Comparative Study Between Prophet Facebook, NNAR, FTS Models,"
Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 66(2), pages 1647-1669, August.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:compec:v:66:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10762-7
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-024-10762-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:66:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10762-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.