IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijba11/v12y2021i4p16-33.html

The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation in the Innovation Process Between Established Organizations and Startups

Author

Listed:
  • Maicon Scaravonatto Mail
  • Jorge Renato Verschoore
  • Jefferson Marlon Monticelli

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamic process of coopetition between an established organization and startups to develop innovation. We conducted an exploratory, qualitative study, based on Grounded Theory. The Grounded Theory allows the development of a theory emerging from data that is simultaneously collected and analyzed, determining the categories to observe the core questions. It can be divided into two stages: initial coding (open and axial coding) and focused coding. In the open coding, are defined categories and subcategories that are reviewed in the axial coding to generate more precise explanations? Along with the focused coding, the data organized from initial coding is categorized for an analytical understanding of the phenomena. In the first stage, we conducted eight semi-structured interviews with a homogeneous sample. An interview guide addressing coopetition factors was developed. As a result, we developed a framework from the theoretical background. This framework was evaluated by three executives and professors with experience in coopetition between large corporations and startups. The snowball technique was used to recruit the participants. Our findings reveal that different factors ¨C market increase, strategic alignment, and technological alignment ¨C are associated. We observed that coopetition not only helps in developing new markets but also in understanding the user demands of these markets. Thus, coopetition is an accelerator of innovation, since it allows the identification of the resource complementarity and technological scale gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Maicon Scaravonatto Mail & Jorge Renato Verschoore & Jefferson Marlon Monticelli, 2021. "The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation in the Innovation Process Between Established Organizations and Startups," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(4), pages 16-33, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:16-33
    DOI: 10.5430/ijba.v12n4p16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/19664/12669
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/19664
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/ijba.v12n4p16?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nutter, G Warren & Moore, John H, 1976. "A Theory of Competition," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 39-65, April.
    2. Lechner, Christian & Dowling, Michael & Welpe, Isabell, 2006. "Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 514-540, July.
    3. Paul Chiambaretto & Jonathan Maurice & Marc Willinger, 2020. "Value creation and value appropriation In innovative coopetition projects," Working Papers hal-02497321, HAL.
    4. Paul Chiambaretto & Jonathan Maurice & Marc Willinger, 2020. "Value creation and value appropriation in innovative coopetition projects," Post-Print hal-02497321, HAL.
    5. Gautam Ahuja, 2000. "The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 317-343, March.
    6. Anna Minà & Giovanni Battista Dagnino & Gianluca Vagnani, 2020. "An interpretive framework of the interplay of competition and cooperation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(1), pages 1-35, March.
    7. Werner Hoffmann & Dovev Lavie & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Andrew Shipilov, 2018. "The interplay of competition and cooperation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 3033-3052, December.
    8. Giovanna Padula & Giovanni Battista Dagnino, 2007. "Untangling the Rise of Coopetition: The Intrusion of Competition in a Cooperative Game Structure," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 32-52, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Albert Cromarias & Alexandre Asselineau, 2024. "One for all or everyone for themselves: why is coopetition so difficult? The case of four small vineyards in central France," Post-Print hal-03631930, HAL.
    2. Klimas, Patrycja & Kawa, Arkadiusz & Sachpazidu, Karina & Stańczyk, Sylwia & Brenk, Katharina & Kanbach, Dominik K., 2025. "Decoding coopetition performance using impactful coopetition attributes: Evidence from manufacturing companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Farazi, Mohammad Saleh & Chiambaretto, Paul & Fernandez, Anne-Sophie & Gopalakrishnan, Shanthi, 2024. "Unbundling the impact of current and future competition on cooperation in coopetition projects for innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    4. Zohreh Ali Esmaeili & Yaser Sobhanifard, 2025. "Navigating the Sustainable Business Model: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis at the Intersection of Circular Economy and Innovation Management in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(8), pages 6825-6861, December.
    5. Claudia Benitez-Nuñez & Mónica Santana & Daniel Dorta-Afonso & Petra Saá-Pérez, 2025. "The coopetition management process: a science mapping analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(12), pages 3749-3788, December.
    6. Xie, Qiuhao & Gao, Ying & Xia, Nini & Zhang, Shuibo & Tao, Guowu, 2023. "Coopetition and organizational performance outcomes: A meta-analysis of the main and moderator effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Telg, Nina & Lokshin, Boris & Letterie, Wilko, 2023. "How formal and informal intellectual property protection matters for firms' decision to engage in coopetition: The role of environmental dynamism and competition intensity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    8. Blanka Tundys & Piotr Niedzielski, 2022. "Investigating the Logistics Coopetition in Macroeconomic Perspective - Comparative Analysis of V4 Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 439-454.
    9. Joanna Cygler & Włodzimierz Sroka & Marina Solesvik & Katarzyna Dębkowska, 2018. "Benefits and Drawbacks of Coopetition: The Roles of Scope and Durability in Coopetitive Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Yu, Yiyong & Cheng, Li & Zhang, Danni, 2024. "How does market competition affect enterprise cooperative innovation? The moderating role of intellectual property protection and government subsidies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Fernandez, Anne-Sophie & Chiambaretto, Paul & Chauvet, Mathieu & Engsig, Juliane, 2021. "Why do MNEs both make and coopete for innovation?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    12. Sofy Carayannopoulos, 2009. "How Technology–Based New Firms Leverage Newness and Smallness to Commercialize Disruptive Technologies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(2), pages 419-438, March.
    13. Dorn, Stefanie & Schweiger, Bastian & Albers, Sascha, 2016. "Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 484-500.
    14. Rouyre, Audrey & Fernandez, Anne-Sophie & Bruyaka, Olga, 2024. "Big problems require large collective actions: Managing multilateral coopetition in strategic innovation networks," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Xie, Qiuhao & Ma, Pei & Gao, Ying & Zhang, Shuibo, 2024. "Unpacking coopetition in international strategic alliances: Dimensions, contingencies, and structures," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    16. Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Violeta Radulescu & Stefan Alexandru Ionescu, 2018. "What Makes Coopetition Successful? An Inter-Organizational Side Analysis on Coopetition Critical Success Factors in Oil and Gas Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Kwangsoo Shin & Sang Ji Kim & Gunno Park, 2016. "How does the partner type in R&D alliances impact technological innovation performance? A study on the Korean biotechnology industry," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 141-164, March.
    18. Shantala Samant & Jongwook Kim, 2021. "Determinants of common benefits and private benefits in innovation alliances," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 294-307, March.
    19. Estrada, Isabel & de la Fuente, Gabriel & Martín-Cruz, Natalia, 2010. "Technological joint venture formation under the real options approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1185-1197, November.
    20. Pauline Brunner & Karim Messeghem, 2025. "Exploring the construction of social capital within the student entrepreneurship sub-ecosystem," Post-Print hal-04993466, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:16-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijba.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.