IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v6y2017i3p135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Business Life Cycle and Performance Discrepancy on R&D Expenditures-Evidence from Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-Chin Chang
  • She-Chih Chiu
  • Pei-Cheng Wu

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of business life cycle and performance discrepancy on Research and Development (R&D) expenditure. Specifically, we argue that managers of firms in different stages of business life cycle make R&D decisions according to their perception of performance discrepancy. We investigate three stages of business life cycle- growth stage, maturity stage, and stagnant stage. Based on a sample of firms listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange, we find that managers of firms in the growth stage tend to increase R&D expenditure when they experience positive performance discrepancy. This implies that growing firms’ slack-resource-driven behavior is leads to the increase in R&D expenditure. There is some evidence that managers of firms in the mature stage tend to increase R&D spending when they experience negative performance discrepancy, indicate that negative performance discrepancy triggers the problem-driven search behavior of managers of mature firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Chin Chang & She-Chih Chiu & Pei-Cheng Wu, 2017. "The Impact of Business Life Cycle and Performance Discrepancy on R&D Expenditures-Evidence from Taiwan," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(3), pages 135-135, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/11417/7399
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/11417
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Comin, Diego & Mulani, Sunil, 2009. "A theory of growth and volatility at the aggregate and firm level," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 1023-1042, November.
    2. Pino G. Audia & Henrich R. Greve, 2006. "Less Likely to Fail: Low Performance, Firm Size, and Factory Expansion in the Shipbuilding Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 83-94, January.
    3. Danny Miller & Peter H. Friesen, 1984. "A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(10), pages 1161-1183, October.
    4. Anthony, Joseph H. & Ramesh, K., 1992. "Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices : A test of the life cycle hypothesis," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2-3), pages 203-227, August.
    5. Michele Kremen Bolton, 1993. "Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 57-75, February.
    6. Shantanu Dutta & Om Narasimhan & Surendra Rajiv, 1999. "Success in High-Technology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 547-568.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavol Durana & Lucia Michalkova & Andrej Privara & Josef Marousek & Milos Tumpach, 2021. "Does the life cycle affect earnings management and bankruptcy?," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 425-461, June.
    2. Liem Tan Vo & Nhi Van Vo & Toan Ngoc Pham & Nguyen Ngoc Hien, 2023. "The Impact of Historical Performance and Managerial Risk-taking Propensity on the Behavior of Choosing Prospector Strategy and Using Strategic Management Accounting Information in Viet Nam Manufacture," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    3. Minhas Akbar & Ahsan Akbar & Petra Maresova & Minghui Yang & Hafiz Muhammad Arshad, 2020. "Unraveling the Bankruptcy Risk‒Return Paradox across the Corporate Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Fawad Rauf & Wanqiu Wang & Cosmina L. Voinea, 2024. "Interaction of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting at the Crossroads of Green Innovation Performance and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of the Enterprise Life Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Montserrat Manzaneque & Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramírez & Julio Diéguez-Soto & Maria J. Martínez-Romero, 2020. "How negative aspiration performance gaps affect innovation efficiency," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 209-233, January.
    6. Mennens, Kars & van Gils, Anita & Odekerken - Schröder, Gaby & Letterie, Wilko, 2016. "Exploring Antecedents of Service Innovation Excellence in Manufacturing SMEs," Research Memorandum 025, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    7. Abu Amin & Blake Bowler & Mostafa Monzur Hasan & Gerald L. Lobo & Jiri Tresl, 2020. "Firm Life Cycle and Cost of Debt," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp665, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    8. Lisa Silge & Arnt Wöhrmann, 2021. "Market reaction to asymmetric cost behavior: the impact of long-term growth expectations," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 309-347, February.
    9. Sam Rockwell, 2016. "Identity Processes to Trigger Turnaround in Response to Organizational Decline," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, February.
    10. Sang-Lyul Ryu & Jayoun Won, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Operational Innovation: Insights from the Perspective of Firm Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Tom Van Caneghem & Walter Aerts & Oveis Madadian, 2021. "Peer‐based comparison and firms' discretionary cost decisions," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 163-185, March.
    12. Bum-Jin Park, 2021. "Corporate Social and Financial Performance: The Role of Firm Life Cycle in Business Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Duong Hoang Vu & Bruce Dehning & Drahomíra Pavelková, 2023. "Firm life cycle and foreign direct investment spillover effect: The case of the Czech Republic," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 319-340, April.
    14. Bikki Jaggi & Alessandra Allini & Raffaela Casciello & Fiorenza Meucci, 2022. "Firm life cycle stages and earnings management," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1019-1049, October.
    15. Amin, Abu & Bowler, Blake & Hasan, Mostafa Monzur & Lobo, Gerald J. & Tresl, Jiri, 2023. "Firm life cycle and cost of debt," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Hasan, Mostafa Monzur & Habib, Ahsan, 2017. "Firm life cycle and idiosyncratic volatility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 164-175.
    17. Xiaolan Wu & Shengyuan Wang, 2022. "Assessment of Enterprise Life Cycle Based on Two-Stage Logistic Model: Exemplified by China’s Automobile Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Yuehua Xu & Guangtao Zeng, 2021. "Corporate social performance aspiration and its effects," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1181-1207, December.
    19. Moyassar Al-Taie & Aileen Cater-Steel, 2020. "The Organisational Life Cycle Scale: An Empirical Validation," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 29(2), pages 293-325, September.
    20. Andy Fodor & Kelley Bergsma Lovelace & Vijay Singal & Jitendra Tayal, 2024. "Does firm life cycle stage affect investor perceptions? Evidence from earnings announcement reactions," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1039-1096, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.