IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v10y2018i4p457-475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional Service Jobs: Highly Paid but Subject to Disruption?

Author

Listed:
  • Scott E. Sampson

    (Marriott School of Business, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602)

Abstract

Professional service jobs are attractive because they pay well and, because of advanced skill requirements, have been relatively resistant to disruption. This research questions the job security of professional service workers in healthcare, higher education, legal services, and management. Specifically, we explore the potential for new and advanced information technologies to allow lower-paid employees to do the work of service professionals. We do this by empirically analyzing job characteristics that might justify the higher pay of professional service jobs and then evaluating whether those characteristics are truly distinctive of professionals. We consider job characteristics pertaining to low task structure and high decision impact, which theory suggests inhibit automation and justify professional training. Specific contributions of the research include (1) a model depicting three modes by which advanced information technologies (expert systems) impact professional service jobs, (2) clarification of what is meant by “professional service” in a way that we can operationalize empirically, (3) hypotheses about characteristics of professional service jobs that might justify higher pay, and (4) tests of the hypotheses across and between the aforementioned professional service job categories. Results show that professional service jobs are distinct according to the considered job characteristics but that the distinctions are not universal across industries. Healthcare professions are the most distinctive on these characteristics and, thus, are seemingly less likely to be disrupted. Professional jobs in education, legal services, and management are less distinctive and, thus, more susceptible to be taken over by less-trained and lower-paid workers supported with advanced technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott E. Sampson, 2018. "Professional Service Jobs: Highly Paid but Subject to Disruption?," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 457-475, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:457-475
    DOI: serv.2018.0227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/serv.2018.0227
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/serv.2018.0227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wallace J. Hopp & Seyed M. R. Iravani & Gigi Y. Yuen, 2007. "Operations Systems with Discretionary Task Completion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 61-77, January.
    2. Jonathan V. Beaverstock, 2004. "'Managing across borders': knowledge management and expatriation in professional service legal firms," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 157-179, April.
    3. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Sweeney, Jillian C. & Soutar, Geoffrey N. & Amonini, Claudia, 2008. "Professional Service Firms are Relationship Marketers: But does size matter?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 30-47.
    4. David W. Pearce, 1981. "The Macmillan Dictionary of Modern Economics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-04781-9.
    5. Modestino, Alicia Sasser & Shoag, Daniel & Ballance, Joshua, 2016. "Downskilling: changes in employer skill requirements over the business cycle," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 333-347.
    6. Richard B. Chase, 1981. "The Customer Contact Approach to Services: Theoretical Bases and Practical Extensions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 698-706, August.
    7. Candace Jones & William S. Hesterly & Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist & Stephen P. Borgatti, 1998. "Professional Service Constellations: How Strategies and Capabilities Influence Collaborative Stability and Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 396-410, June.
    8. Deborah L. Kellogg & Richard B. Chase, 1995. "Constructing an Empirically Derived Measure for Customer Contact," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(11), pages 1734-1749, November.
    9. Uday S. Karmarkar & Kihoon Kim & Hosun Rhim, 2015. "Industrialization, Productivity and the Shift to Services and Information," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(11), pages 1675-1695, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotr Bialowolski & Dorota Weziak-Bialowolska, 2021. "What Does It Take to Be a Good Lawyer? The Underpinnings of Success in a Rapidly Growing Legal Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Roels, 2014. "Optimal Design of Coproductive Services: Interaction and Work Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 578-594, October.
    2. Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Guo, Yujuan & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2015. "Being close or being happy? The relative impact of work relationship and job satisfaction on service quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 391-400.
    3. Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2011. "The service-profit chain: An empirical analysis in high-contact service industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 236-245, April.
    4. Chowdhury, Sanjib & Miles, Grant, 2006. "Customer-induced uncertainty in predicting organizational design: Empirical evidence challenging the service versus manufacturing dichotomy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 121-129, January.
    5. Nabil Ghantous, 2015. "Re-examining encounter intensity's conceptualisation, measurement and role," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 237-254, March.
    6. Mei Xue & Lorin M. Hitt & Patrick T. Harker, 2007. "Customer Efficiency, Channel Usage, and Firm Performance in Retail Banking," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 535-558, April.
    7. Myoungjin Yu & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2019. "The Impact of Foreign Flight Attendants’ Service Quality on Behavioral Intention Toward Their Home Country—Applied SERVPERF Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2010. "An empirical study of employee loyalty, service quality and firm performance in the service industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 109-120, March.
    9. Cruz-Ros, Sonia & Gonzalez-Cruz, Tomas F., 2015. "Service firm capabilities and performance: Contingent analysis of customer contact," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1612-1621.
    10. Sunil Mithas & Jonathan Whitaker, 2007. "Is the World Flat or Spiky? Information Intensity, Skills, and Global Service Disaggregation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 237-259, September.
    11. Philipp Afèche & Mojtaba Araghi & Opher Baron, 2017. "Customer Acquisition, Retention, and Service Access Quality: Optimal Advertising, Capacity Level, and Capacity Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 674-691, October.
    12. Gordon L Clark & Ashby H B Monk, 2014. "The Geography of Investment Management Contracts: The UK, Europe, and the Global Financial Services Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 531-549, March.
    13. José Azar & Emiliano Huet-Vaughn & Ioana Marinescu & Bledi Taska & Till von Wachter, 2019. "Minimum Wage Employment Effects and Labor Market Concentration," NBER Working Papers 26101, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Grinis, Inna, 2017. "The STEM requirements of "non-STEM" jobs: evidence from UK online vacancy postings and implications for skills & knowledge shortages," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85123, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Miozzo, Marcela & Desyllas, Panos & Lee, Hsing-fen & Miles, Ian, 2016. "Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1337-1351.
    16. Cho, Woohyun & Windle, Robert J. & Dresner, Martin E., 2017. "The impact of operational exposure and value-of-time on customer choice: Evidence from the airline industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 455-471.
    17. Masha Shunko & Julie Niederhoff & Yaroslav Rosokha, 2018. "Humans Are Not Machines: The Behavioral Impact of Queueing Design on Service Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 453-473, January.
    18. Vasiliki Kostami & Sampath Rajagopalan, 2014. "Speed–Quality Trade-Offs in a Dynamic Model," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 104-118, February.
    19. David Opresnik & Maurizio Fiasché & Marco Taisch & Manuel Hirsch, 0. "An evolving fuzzy inference system for extraction of rule set for planning a product–service strategy," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    20. Mary A. Burke & Alicia Sasser Modestino & Shahriar Sadighi & Rachel B. Sederberg & Bledi Taska, 2019. "No Longer Qualified? Changes in the Supply and Demand for Skills within Occupations," Working Papers 20-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:457-475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.