IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v24y2013i2p552-570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growing at Work: Employees' Interpretations of Progressive Self-Change in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Sonenshein

    (Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005)

  • Jane E. Dutton

    (Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Adam M. Grant

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Gretchen M. Spreitzer

    (Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Kathleen M. Sutcliffe

    (Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

Abstract

We develop theory about how growing at work is an interpretive accomplishment in which individuals sense that they are making progressive self-change. Through a study of how employees interpret themselves as growing at three organizations, we develop a theoretical account of how employees draw from contextual and personal resources to interpret their growing in ways that embed their idiosyncratic experiences within an organization. The data suggest that employees develop three different types of growing self-construals: achieving, learning, and helping. We use our data to ground theory that explains the development of growing self-construals as deeply embedded in organizations. At the same time, we suggest that growing self-construals reflect individual agency through how individuals work with available resources to weave interpretations of themselves into their growing self-construals. We further suggest that growing self-construals influence the actions employees take to support a sense of progressive self-change.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Sonenshein & Jane E. Dutton & Adam M. Grant & Gretchen M. Spreitzer & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, 2013. "Growing at Work: Employees' Interpretations of Progressive Self-Change in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 552-570, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:552-570
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0749
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.1120.0749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arne Carlsen, 2006. "Organizational Becoming as Dialogic Imagination of Practice: The Case of the Indomitable Gauls," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 132-149, February.
    2. Deborah Dougherty, 1992. "Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 179-202, May.
    3. Hazel Rose Markus & Barry Schwartz, 2010. "Does Choice Mean Freedom and Well-Being?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 344-355, August.
    4. C. Marlene Fiol, 2002. "Capitalizing on Paradox: The Role of Language in Transforming Organizational Identities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 653-666, December.
    5. Button, Scott B. & Mathieu, John E. & Zajac, Dennis M., 1996. "Goal Orientation in Organizational Research: A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 26-48, July.
    6. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 1991. "Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 40-57, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amelia Manuti & Maria Luisa Giancaspro, 2019. "People Make the Difference: An Explorative Study on the Relationship between Organizational Practices, Employees’ Resources, and Organizational Behavior Enhancing the Psychology of Sustainability and ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Fisher, Greg & Neubert, Emily & Burnell, Devin, 2021. "Resourcefulness narratives: Transforming actions into stories to mobilize support," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    3. Fernando, Dulini & Patriotta, Gerardo, 2020. "“Us versus them”: Sensemaking and identity processes in skilled migrants’ experiences of occupational downgrading," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    4. Yongbo Sun & Xiaojuan Hu & Yixin Ding, 2019. "Learning or Relaxing: How Do Challenge Stressors Stimulate Employee Creativity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Zulfiqar Ahmed Iqbal & Ghulam Abid & Francoise Contreras & Qandeel Hassan & Rabbia Zafar, 2020. "Ethical Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Individual Attributes," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Omer Erdem Kocak, 2016. "How to Enable Thriving at Work through Organizational Trust?," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 5(4), pages 40-52, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiajun Wu & Liwei Chen, 2022. "The Effects of Multilevel Orientations on Frontline Deliberate Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    2. Torsten Ringberg & Markus Reihlen, 2008. "Towards a Socio‐Cognitive Approach to Knowledge Transfer," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 912-935, July.
    3. Sung‐Choon Kang & Scott A. Snell, 2009. "Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 65-92, January.
    4. Hendy, Jane & Barlow, James, 2012. "The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 348-355.
    5. Ter Wal, Anne L.J. & Criscuolo, Paola & Salter, Ammon, 2017. "Making a marriage of materials: The role of gatekeepers and shepherds in the absorption of external knowledge and innovation performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 1039-1054.
    6. Caroline A. Bartel & Raghu Garud, 2009. "The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 107-117, February.
    7. Anja Danner-Schröder & Daniel Geiger, 2016. "Unravelling the Motor of Patterning Work: Toward an Understanding of the Microlevel Dynamics of Standardization and Flexibility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 633-658, June.
    8. Rupietta, Christian & Backes-Gellner, Uschi, 2019. "Combining knowledge stock and knowledge flow to generate superior incremental innovation performance — Evidence from Swiss manufacturing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 209-222.
    9. Hilda Bø Lyng & Eric Christian Brun, 2020. "Innovating with Strangers; Managing Knowledge Barriers Across Distances in Cross-Industry Innovation," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-33, February.
    10. Guo, Jingjing & Guo, Bin & Zhou, Jianghua & Wu, Xiaobo, 2020. "How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attributes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Mark Thompson, 2005. "Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 151-164, April.
    12. Pär Mårtensson & Uno Fors & Emelie Fröberg & Udo Zander & Gunnar H Nilsson, 2019. "Quality of Research Practice – An interdisciplinary face validity evaluation of a quality model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Siedlok, Frank & Hibbert, Paul & Sillince, John, 2015. "From practice to collaborative community in interdisciplinary research contexts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 96-107.
    14. Hong, Jacky Fok Loi & Snell, Robin Stanley & Easterby-Smith, Mark, 2009. "Knowledge flow and boundary crossing at the periphery of a MNC," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 539-554, December.
    15. Scott Sonenshein, 2009. "Emergence of Ethical Issues During Strategic Change Implementation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 223-239, February.
    16. Linus Dahlander & Lars Frederiksen, 2012. "The Core and Cosmopolitans: A Relational View of Innovation in User Communities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 988-1007, August.
    17. Cross, Rob, 2000. "Looking before you leap: Assessing the jump to teams in knowledge-based work," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 29-36.
    18. Caccamo, Marta & Pittino, Daniel & Tell, Fredrik, 2023. "Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    19. Matsuo, Makoto, 2006. "Customer orientation, conflict, and innovativeness in Japanese sales departments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 242-250, February.
    20. Katherine C. Kellogg & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2006. "Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 22-44, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:552-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.