IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v4y2012i2p79.html

Development of Farmer-led Integrated Management of Major Pests of Cauliflower Cultivated in Rainy Season in India

Author

Listed:
  • Desh Ahuja
  • Usha Rani Ahuja
  • P. Srinivas
  • R.V. Singh
  • Meenakshi Malik
  • Pratibha Sharma
  • O. M. Bamawale

Abstract

Implementation of Integrated Pest and Disease Management programme in irrigated cauliflower crop led to reduction in number of conventional pesticide sprays by 50-60 %. The safer biorational pesticides, insect growth regulators and cultural methods of pest management as introduced in the IPM programme were well received by the farmers in farmers’ participatory trainings (FPT). Lower insect and disease incidence with higher curd production was observed in the IPM fields as compared to conventional non IPM fields. Furthermore the module was able to drag the cost of crop protection down by 45 percent resulting in higher benefit-cost ratio. The IPM module led to reinforcement of natural enemies resulting in sustainable and stable pest control regime warranting less pesticide application. Cotesia glomeratus L. was found parasitizing the larvae of Spodoptera litura F. in IPM fields whereas there was no parasitization in non IPM fields. Post implementation evaluation of the IPM programme revealed that the farmers were educated about the right choice of pesticides, proper time and dose of application, pest monitoring and application of pesticides based on action threshold. Increase in participation of women in the IPM programme was ensured by educating them about the mechanical management of S. litura.

Suggested Citation

  • Desh Ahuja & Usha Rani Ahuja & P. Srinivas & R.V. Singh & Meenakshi Malik & Pratibha Sharma & O. M. Bamawale, 2012. "Development of Farmer-led Integrated Management of Major Pests of Cauliflower Cultivated in Rainy Season in India," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(2), pages 1-79, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/10623/9464
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/10623
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John, 1997. "Consumer Response to Integrated Pest Management and Organic Agriculture: An Econometric Analysis," P Series 36727, Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics.
    2. Pouchepparadjou, A. & Kumaravelu, P. & Achoth, Lalith, 2005. "An Econometric Analysis of Green Technology Adoption in Irrigated Rice in Pondicherry Union Territory," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pratibha Sharma & Mahesh Kumar Saini & Swati Deep & Vignesh Kumar, 2012. "Biological Control of Groundnut Root Rot in Farmer’s Field," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(8), pages 1-48, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez, Elsa Mirta M. & Lacaze, María Victoria & Lupín, Beatriz, 2007. "Willingness to pay for organic food in Argentina: evidence from a consumer survey," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1300, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    2. Prajneshu, 2008. "Fitting of Cobb-Douglas Production Functions: Revisited," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 21(2).
    3. Peter Nijkamp & Chiara Maria Travisi & Gabriella Vindigni, 2002. "Pesticide Risk Valuation in Empirical Economics," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-112/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Renck, Ashley Wood, 2001. "Evaluating Changes In Agricultural Market Structure," 2001 Annual Meeting, July 8-11, 2001, Logan, Utah 36121, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Julieta Alejandra Rodriguez & Elsa Mirta Margarita Rodr?guez & Beatriz Lup?n, 2020. "Consumers? assessment of labelled and packaged fresh potato: Evidence from Experimental Auctions," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(3), pages 1-19.
    6. Rimal, Arbindra & Moon, Wanki & Balasubramanian, Siva K., 2006. "Perceived Risks of Agro-Biotechnology and Organic Food Purchases in the United States," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 37(2), pages 1-10, July.
    7. Hugh Waddington & Birte Snilstveit & Jorge Hombrados & Martina Vojtkova & Daniel Phillips & Philip Davies & Howard White, 2014. "Farmer Field Schools for Improving Farming Practices and Farmer Outcomes: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages -335.
    8. Maria Travisi, Chiara & Nijkamp, Peter & Vindigni, Gabriella, 2006. "Pesticide risk valuation in empirical economics: a comparative approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 455-474, April.
    9. Cranfield, John A.L. & Magnusson, Erik, 2003. "Canadian Consumer's Willingness-To-Pay For Pesticide Free Food Products: An Ordered Probit Analysis," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 6(4), pages 1-18.
    10. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John & Adelaja, Adesoji, 2001. "Predicting Willingness-to-Pay a Premium for Integrated Pest Management Produce: A Logistic Approach," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 151-159, October.
    11. Greene, Catherine R., 2001. "U.S. Organic Farming Emerges in the 1990s: Adoption of Certified Systems," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33777, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Erik Magnusson & J. A. L. Cranfield, 2005. "Consumer Demand for Pesticide Free Food Products in Canada: A Probit Analysis," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 53(1), pages 67-81, March.
    13. Thennarasu, R. & Banumathy, V., 2011. "Economics of Sugarcane Production using Ecofriendly Technology in Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 66(01), pages 1-9.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.