IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijmsjn/v10y2018i1p90-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Better Understanding of Consumer Behavior: Marginal Utility as a Parameter in Neuromarketing Research

Author

Listed:
  • Letizia Alvino
  • Efthymios Constantinides
  • Massimo Franco

Abstract

Understanding consumers¡¯ decision-making process is one of the most important goal in Marketing. However, the traditional tools (e,g, surveys, personal interviews and observations) used in Marketing research are often inadequate to analyse and study consumer behaviour. Since people¡¯s decisions are influenced by several unconscious mental processes, the consumers very often do not want to, or do not know how to, explain their choices. For this reason, Neuromarketing research has grown in popularity. Neuromarketing uses both psychological and Neuroscience techniques in order to analyse the neurological and psychological mechanisms that underlying human decisions and behaviours. Hence, studying these mechanisms is useful to explain consumers¡¯ responses to marketing stimuli. This paper (1) provides an overview of the current and previous research in Neuromarketing; (2) analyzes the use of Marginal Utility theory in Neuromarketing. In fact, there is remarkably little direct empirical evidence of the use of Marginal Utility in Neuromarketing studies. Marginal Utility is an essential economic parameter affecting satisfaction and one of the most important elements of the consumers¡¯ decision-making process. Through the use of Marginal Utility theory, economists can measure satisfaction, which affects largely the consumer¡¯s decision-making process. The research gap between Neuromarketing and use of Marginal Utility theory is discussed in this paper. We describe why Neuromarketing studies should take into account this parameter. We conclude with our vision of the potential research at the interaction of Marginal Utility and Neuromarketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Letizia Alvino & Efthymios Constantinides & Massimo Franco, 2018. "Towards a Better Understanding of Consumer Behavior: Marginal Utility as a Parameter in Neuromarketing Research," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 90-106, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:90-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/view/73509/40813
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/view/73509
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Douglas Bernheim, 2009. "On the Potential of Neuroeconomics: A Critical (but Hopeful) Appraisal," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 1-41, August.
    2. Pearson,Charles S., 2000. "Economics and the Global Environment," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521770026.
    3. Camillo Padoa-Schioppa & John A. Assad, 2006. "Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7090), pages 223-226, May.
    4. Paul Brewer & Sunil Venaik, 2010. "GLOBE practices and values: A case of diminishing marginal utility?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(8), pages 1316-1324, October.
    5. Wagner, Alfred, 1891. "Marshall's Principles of Economics," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 5, pages 319-338.
    6. Pearson,Charles S., 2000. "Economics and the Global Environment," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521779883.
    7. Timothy Dittmer, 2005. "Diminishing Marginal Utility in Economics Textbooks," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 391-399, October.
    8. John A Clithero & Dharol Tankersley & Scott A Huettel, 2008. "Foundations of Neuroeconomics: From Philosophy to Practice," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-6, November.
    9. Klucharev, V. & Smidts, A. & Fernández, G., 2008. "Brain Mechanisms of Persuasion: How "Expert Power" Modulates Memory and Attitudes," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-038-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katakam, Bharath Shashanka & Bhukya, Ramulu & Bellamkonda, Raja Shekhar & Samala, Nagaraj, 2021. "Longitudinal analysis versus cross-sectional analysis in assessing the factors influencing shoppers’ impulse purchase behavior – Do the store ambience and salesperson interactions really matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvino, Letizia & Constantinides, Efthymios & Franco, Massimo, 2018. "Towards a better understanding of consumer behavior : Marginal utility as a parameter in neuromarketing research," Other publications TiSEM b3e61951-9032-4cb4-b075-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Cary Frydman & Nicholas Barberis & Colin Camerer & Peter Bossaerts & Antonio Rangel, 2012. "Using Neural Data to Test a Theory of Investor Behavior: An Application to Realization Utility," NBER Working Papers 18562, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Marie KUBANKOVA & Miroslav HAJEK & Alena VOTAVOVA, 2016. "Environmental and social value of agriculture innovation," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(3), pages 101-112.
    4. Ryan Webb & Paul W. Glimcher & Kenway Louie, 2021. "The Normalization of Consumer Valuations: Context-Dependent Preferences from Neurobiological Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 93-125, January.
    5. Budy Resosudarmo & Arief Anshory Yusuf & Ditya A. Nurdianto, 2012. "Preliminary Analysis of REDD on Indonesian's Economy," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 201204, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Dec 2012.
    6. Judith M. Dean & Mary E. Lovely & Hua Wang, 2017. "Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Mary E Lovely (ed.), International Economic Integration and Domestic Performance, chapter 9, pages 155-167, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Michael Dutschke, 2007. "CDM Forestry and the Ultimate Objective of the Climate Convention," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 275-302, February.
    8. Runge, C. Ford, 2001. "A Global Environment Organization (Geo) And The World Trading System: Prospects And Problems," Working Papers 14448, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    9. Daniel Serra, 2020. "Neuroeconomics: reliable, scientifically legitimate and useful knowledge for economists?," Working Papers hal-02956441, HAL.
    10. Budy P. Resosudarmo & Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2006. "Is the Log Export Ban Effective? Revisiting the Issue through the Case of Indonesia," Economics and Environment Network Working Papers 0602, Australian National University, Economics and Environment Network.
    11. Vijay OJHA, 2010. "Trade-Off Between Carbon Emissions, Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction in India," EcoMod2004 330600106, EcoMod.
    12. Daniel Serra, 2021. "Decision-making: from neuroscience to neuroeconomics—an overview," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 1-80, July.
    13. Aparna Sawhney, 2004. "WTO-Related matters in trade and environment: Relationship between WTO Rules and meas," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 133, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    14. Kastratovic, Radovan, 2019. "Impact of foreign direct investment on greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture of developing countries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(3), July.
    15. Witt, Ulrich & Binder, Martin, 2013. "Disentangling motivational and experiential aspects of “utility” – A neuroeconomics perspective," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 27-40.
    16. Anthony Barnes Atkinson, 2003. "Innovative Sources for Development Finance: Over-Arching Issues," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-88, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Fischer, Carolyn & Hoffmann, Sandra A. & Yoshino, Yutaka, 2002. "Multilateral Trade Agreements and Market-Based Environmental Policies," Discussion Papers 10758, Resources for the Future.
    18. Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Itzhak Gingi Aharon, 2011. "From Neuroeconomics to Genetics: The Intertemporal Choices Case as an Example," Post-Print ijn_00713466, HAL.
    19. A.J. Arnold, 2017. "Capital reduction case law decisions and the development of the capital maintenance doctrine in late-nineteenth-century England," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 172-190, February.
    20. Yariv, Leeat & Jackson, Matthew O., 2018. "The Non-Existence of Representative Agents," CEPR Discussion Papers 13397, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    consumer satisfaction; consumers decision-making process; Marginal Utility; Neuromarketing; Consumer Neuroscience;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:90-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.