IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v62y2016i3id58-2015-agricecon.html

Environmental and social value of agriculture innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Marie KUBANKOVA

    (Agricultural Research, Ltd. Troubsko, Czech Republic)

  • Miroslav HAJEK

    (Department of Forestry Economics and Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, The Czech Republic)

  • Alena VOTAVOVA

    (Agricultural Research, Ltd. Troubsko, Czech Republic)

Abstract

New requirements regarding agriculture production together with the increased pressure on environmentally friendly practices leave almost no space for the routine agriculture production. Innovations that include environmental changes are therefore essential. Agricultural research faces various challenges associated with the quality and effectiveness of agriculture production and recently also with the environmental and sustainability issues. The paper provides a case study focused on the environmental and social evaluation of a biological asset that constitutes an agricultural innovation. This paper also shows a concrete example of how the social and environmental reporting can be constructed and implemented by providing an evaluation of a Bumblebee Nest. As a result, the total value consisting of the market, ecosystem and aesthetic value is provided. Although the market value comprises the largest proportion of the total value, it does not exceed 64%.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie KUBANKOVA & Miroslav HAJEK & Alena VOTAVOVA, 2016. "Environmental and social value of agriculture innovation," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(3), pages 101-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:62:y:2016:i:3:id:58-2015-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/58/2015-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/58/2015-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/58/2015-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bebbington, Jan & Larrinaga, Carlos, 2014. "Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 395-413.
    2. Janssen, Sander & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2007. "Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 622-636, June.
    3. Contrafatto, Massimo, 2014. "The institutionalization of social and environmental reporting: An Italian narrative," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 414-432.
    4. Tregidga, Helen & Milne, Markus & Kearins, Kate, 2014. "(Re)presenting ‘sustainable organizations’," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 477-494.
    5. Pearson,Charles S., 2000. "Economics and the Global Environment," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521779883, Enero-Abr.
    6. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570310505961 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Papalexandris, Alexandros & Ioannou, George & Prastacos, Gregory & Eric Soderquist, Klas, 2005. "An Integrated Methodology for Putting the Balanced Scorecard into Action," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 214-227, April.
    8. Martin Messner & Brian Jørgensen, 2010. "Accounting and Strategising: A Case Study from New Product Development," Post-Print hal-00528382, HAL.
    9. Pearson,Charles S., 2000. "Economics and the Global Environment," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521770026, Enero-Abr.
    10. Carmen Cabello Medina & Antonio Carmona Lavado & Gloria Cuevas Rodríguez & Ana Pérez-Luño, 2011. "Do best and worst innovative companies differ in terms of intellectual capital, knowledge and radicalness?," Working Papers 11.01, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Business Administration.
    11. Jones, Michael John, 2010. "Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 123-138.
    12. Jørgensen, Brian & Messner, Martin, 2010. "Accounting and strategising: A case study from new product development," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 184-204, February.
    13. Yanjun Guo & Yansui Liu & Qi Wen & Yurui Li, 2014. "The Transformation of Agricultural Development towards a Sustainable Future from an Evolutionary View on the Chinese Loess Plateau: A Case Study of Fuxian County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Michael John Jones, 2010. "Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 123-138, June.
    15. Michael John Jones, 2003. "Accounting for biodiversity: operationalising environmental accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(5), pages 762-789, December.
    16. Cairns, Robert D., 2006. "On accounting for sustainable development and accounting for the environment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 211-216, December.
    17. Spence, Laura J. & Rinaldi, Leonardo, 2014. "Governmentality in accounting and accountability: A case study of embedding sustainability in a supply chain," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 433-452.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teresina Mancuso & Tibor Verduna & Simone Blanc & Giuseppe Di Vita & Filippo Brun, 2019. "Environmental sustainability and economic matters of commercial types of common wheat," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(4), pages 194-202.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvio Bianchi Martini & Antonio Corvino & Federica Doni & Antonietta Trecca, 2026. "Exploring Biodiversity Disclosure and Financial Performance in the European Context: The Moderating Role of Board Experience," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 4083-4101, March.
    2. Adams, Dawda & Ullah, Subhan & Akhtar, Pervaiz & Adams, Kweku & Saidi, Samir, 2019. "The role of country-level institutional factors in escaping the natural resource curse: Insights from Ghana," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 433-440.
    3. O'Dwyer, Brendan & Unerman, Jeffrey, 2016. "Fostering rigour in accounting for social sustainability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-40.
    4. Passetti, Emilio & Cinquini, Lino & Marelli, Alessandro & Tenucci, Andrea, 2014. "Sustainability accounting in action: Lights and shadows in the Italian context," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 295-308.
    5. Minga Negash & Tesfaye T. Lemma, 2020. "Institutional pressures and the accounting and reporting of environmental liabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1941-1960, July.
    6. Cho, Charles H. & Laine, Matias & Roberts, Robin W. & Rodrigue, Michelle, 2015. "Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 78-94.
    7. Gabriella D'Amore & Antonio D'Alessio & Alessandro Scaletti, 2025. "Environmental Accounting and Sustainability Accounting: Lexical or Substantial Difference?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 1376-1394, November.
    8. Bigoni, Michele & Mohammed, Sideeq, 2023. "Critique is unsustainable: A polemic," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Botzem, Sebastian & Dobusch, Leonhard, 2017. "Financialization as strategy: Accounting for inter-organizational value creation in the European real estate industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 31-43.
    10. Rambaud, Alexandre & Richard, Jacques, 2015. "The “Triple Depreciation Line” instead of the “Triple Bottom Line”: Towards a genuine integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 92-116.
    11. Daniel Buda & Hoinaru Razvan & Mocanu Mihaela & Roman Aureliana-Geta, 2019. "IAS 41 and beyond for a sustainable EU agriculture," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 829-839, May.
    12. Sitkin, Alan, 2013. "Working for the local community: Substantively broader/geographically narrower CSR accounting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 315-324.
    13. Vijay OJHA, 2010. "Trade-Off Between Carbon Emissions, Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction in India," EcoMod2004 330600106, EcoMod.
    14. Müller-Stewens, Benedikt & Widener, Sally K. & Möller, Klaus & Steinmann, Jan-Christoph, 2020. "The role of diagnostic and interactive control uses in innovation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. Paolo Collini & Maria Laura Frigotto, 2013. "Management Control Systems for exploration? A paradox and a challenge for research," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 27-44.
    16. Amer Shakkour & Hamza Alaodat & Emad Alqisi & Ali Alghazawi, 2018. "The Role of Environmental Accounting in Sustainable Development. Empirical Study," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 1-5.
    17. Binh Bui & Carolyn Fowler, 2022. "Carbon controls in a New Zealand electricity utility: An application of theoretical triangulation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4423-4451, December.
    18. François Meyssonnier, 2015. "Les dispositifs de pilotage de la performance en environnement innovant et incertain : étude comparative de huit startups," Working Papers hal-01147206, HAL.
    19. Mihai Carp & Leontina Păvăloaia & Mihai-Bogdan Afrăsinei & Iuliana Eugenia Georgescu, 2019. "Is Sustainability Reporting a Business Strategy for Firm’s Growth? Empirical Study on the Romanian Capital Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Simon Alcouffe & Jonathan Maurice & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gate, 2019. "Is the limited diffusion of management accounting innovations really a paradox? A meta-analysis of the relationship between product diversity and the adoption of Activity-Based Costing [La faible diffusion des innovations en contrôle de gestion es," Post-Print hal-02124677, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:62:y:2016:i:3:id:58-2015-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.