IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v18y2026i3p32.html

Comparative Analysis of Online Shopping Behavior Among International and Chinese Students

Author

Listed:
  • Giriteka Francis Ronet
  • Solomon Boamah
  • Gao Shengbing

Abstract

This study investigates the underexplored comparative online shopping behaviors between international and Chinese students within China’s dynamic online shopping landscape, dominated by platforms like Taobao, Pinduoduo and many more. Utilizing a cross-sectional survey of 357 participants with a gender distribution of 40.90% male and 59.10% female and analyzing data with descriptive statistics, t-tests, and regression models, the research identified key distinctions; international students, acting as “pragmatic adapters,” were more price-sensitive, predominantly used Taobao, were heavily influenced by social media promotions (β = 0.194, P < 0.001), and were significantly hindered by language barriers (β = -0.162, P < 0.001) and lower trust in customer service (β = -0.207, P < 0.001). In contrast, Chinese “savvy navigators” preferred Pinduoduo, demonstrated higher monthly spending, and exhibited greater financial risk concern (β = 0.127, P < 0.001) alongside stronger trust in product delivery. The findings, which also highlighted socio-demographic determinants like the strong correlation between income and spending (r = 0.520, P < 0.01), conclude that strategic enhancements in multilingual support, culturally sensitive design, and customer service are imperative for e-commerce platforms to achieve global inclusivity and bridge this experiential divide.

Suggested Citation

  • Giriteka Francis Ronet & Solomon Boamah & Gao Shengbing, 2026. "Comparative Analysis of Online Shopping Behavior Among International and Chinese Students," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(3), pages 1-32, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/52890/57663
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/52890
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergio Palacios & Minjoon Jun, 2020. "An exploration of online shopping convenience dimensions and their associations with customer satisfaction," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 24-49.
    2. Jianmin Jia & James S. Dyer & John C. Butler, 1999. "Measures of Perceived Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 519-532, April.
    3. Tian, Xin & Jiang, Hailiang & Zhao, Xuan, 2024. "Product assortment and online sales in community group-buying channel: Evidence from a convenience store chain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Ying & Dyer, James S. & Butler, John C. & Jia, Jianmin, 2019. "An additive model of decision making under risk and ambiguity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 78-92.
    2. Yang, Jiping & Qiu, Wanhua, 2005. "A measure of risk and a decision-making model based on expected utility and entropy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 792-799, August.
    3. Khan, Mohammad Tariqul Islam & Tan, Siow-Hooi & Chong, Lee-Lee, 2017. "How past perceived portfolio returns affect financial behaviors—The underlying psychological mechanism," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1478-1488.
    4. Robert J. Aumann & Roberto Serrano, 2008. "An Economic Index of Riskiness," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 810-836, October.
    5. Christine Kaufmann & Martin Weber & Emily Haisley, 2013. "The Role of Experience Sampling and Graphical Displays on One's Investment Risk Appetite," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 323-340, July.
    6. Felix Holzmeister & Christoph Huber & Stefan Palan, 2022. "A critical perspective on the conceptualization of risk in behavioral and experimental finance," Chapters, in: Sascha Füllbrunn & Ernan Haruvy (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Finance, chapter 30, pages 408-413, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Christoph Huber & Jürgen Huber, 2019. "Scale matters: risk perception, return expectations, and investment propensity under different scalings," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 76-100, March.
    8. Kaufmann, Christine & Weber, Martin, 2013. "Sometimes less is more – The influence of information aggregation on investment decisions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 20-33.
    9. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox, Jr, 2008. "Why Risk Is Not Variance: An Expository Note," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 925-928, August.
    10. Chien, Pei-Yu & Cadeaux, Jack, 2026. "How assortment size, distinctive allocations, and local market density affect convenience store transaction performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. He, Ying & Huang, Rui-Hua, 2008. "Risk attributes theory: Decision making under risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 243-260, April.
    12. Guo, Dongmei & Hu, Yi & Wang, Shouyang & Zhao, Lin, 2016. "Comparing risks with reference points: A stochastic dominance approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 105-116.
    13. Venkatraman, Srinivasan & Aloysius, John A. & Davis, Fred D., 2006. "Multiple prospect framing and decision behavior: The mediational roles of perceived riskiness and perceived ambiguity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 59-73, September.
    14. Alexandra A. Mislin & Peter A. Boumgarden & Daisung Jang & William P. Bottom, 2015. "Accounting for reciprocity in negotiation and social exchange," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(6), pages 571-589, November.
    15. repec:grz:wpsses:2021-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Davies, G.B., 2005. "Rethinking Risk: Aspiration as Pure Risk," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0507, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    17. Li, Jun & Zhang, Ao & Wang, Chengyuan & Wang, Shanyong & Liang, Liang, 2025. "Switching behavior in the adoption of electric vehicle in China: Perspective of push–pull-mooring framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Alen Nosić & Martin Weber, 2010. "How Riskily Do I Invest? The Role of Risk Attitudes, Risk Perceptions, and Overconfidence," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 282-301, September.
    19. Peter J Buckley & Liang Chen & L Jeremy Clegg & Hinrich Voss, 2018. "Risk propensity in the foreign direct investment location decision of emerging multinationals," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(2), pages 153-171, February.
    20. Noryusnita Ramli & Nur Alyani Mohd Shukri & Siti Nasarah Ismail, 2025. "The Relationship Between Attitude on Personalised Advertising and Buying Behaviour Among Millennials in Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 3278-3287, January.
    21. Franke, Günter & Weber, Martin, 2001. "Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World," CoFE Discussion Papers 01/08, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.