IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4058-d1646917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the Digital Economy Really Narrow the Innovation Efficiency Gap Among Cities in China?—A Study from the Perspective of Triple Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuo Huang

    (Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China)

  • Lin Tang

    (Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China)

  • Xiang Chen

    (Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China)

  • Jian Han

    (Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China)

Abstract

This study investigates how the digital economy empowers urban network intensity to address the dilemma of “low-efficiency lock-in” and to promote high-quality and balanced innovation development. Based on panel data from 264 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2011 to 2022, the study adopts a multi-network perspective—covering innovation, information, and economic networks—and employs fixed effects and two-stage models to examine the impact and underlying mechanisms of the digital economy on disparities in urban innovation efficiency. The results reveal that the digital economy significantly reduces the gap in innovation efficiency across cities, primarily through the optimization of innovation networks and the strengthening of information networks. Moreover, the economic network positively moderates this relationship, amplifying the digital economy’s narrowing effect on innovation disparities. Threshold model tests indicate a nonlinear influence of the digital economy, showing an initial widening followed by a reduction in innovation efficiency gaps as innovation, information, and economic networks evolve. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that among the various dimensions of the digital economy, only digital industrialization plays a significant role in reducing efficiency disparities, while digital governance, digital infrastructure, industrial digitalization, and data valorization do not yet show statistically significant effects. Furthermore, the digital economy significantly reduces innovation efficiency gaps in southern cities, in regions southeast of the Hu Line, and in large cities, whereas in cities northwest of the Hu Line, digital economy development tends to exacerbate these disparities. This study provides both theoretical support for the coordinated improvement of innovation efficiency driven by the digital economy and practical implications for lagging cities aiming to leverage network effects to catch up in innovation performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuo Huang & Lin Tang & Xiang Chen & Jian Han, 2025. "Can the Digital Economy Really Narrow the Innovation Efficiency Gap Among Cities in China?—A Study from the Perspective of Triple Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4058-:d:1646917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 577-586.
    2. Songqin Zhao & Diyun Peng & Huwei Wen & Huilin Song, 2022. "Does the Digital Economy Promote Upgrading the Industrial Structure of Chinese Cities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Pan, Wenrong & Xie, Tao & Wang, Zhuwang & Ma, Lisha, 2022. "Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 303-311.
    4. Xie, Luqun & Zhou, Jieyu & Zong, Qingqing & Lu, Qian, 2020. "Gender diversity in R&D teams and innovation efficiency: Role of the innovation context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    5. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    6. Bo Chen & Huasheng Zhu, 2021. "Has the Digital Economy Changed the Urban Network Structure in China?—Based on the Analysis of China’s Top 500 New Economy Enterprises in 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Chen, Zhiang & Xing, Ruikun, 2025. "Digital economy, green innovation and high-quality economic development," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Sendhil Mullainathan & Marianne Bertrand, 2001. "Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(2), pages 67-72, May.
    9. Pablo Galaso & Jaromír Kovářík, 2021. "Collaboration networks, geography and innovation: Local and national embeddedness," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(2), pages 349-377, April.
    10. Peiró-Palomino, Jesús & Perugini, Francesco, 2022. "Regional innovation disparities in Italy: The role of governance," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    11. Ioanna Kastelli & Petros Dimas & Dimitrios Stamopoulos & Aggelos Tsakanikas, 2024. "Linking Digital Capacity to Innovation Performance: the Mediating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 238-272, March.
    12. Min, Sujin & Kim, Juseong & Sawng, Yeong-Wha, 2020. "The effect of innovation network size and public R&D investment on regional innovation efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Ma, Zhuoya & Xiao, Hui & Li, Jing & Chen, Hanting & Chen, Wenhui, 2025. "Study on how the digital economy affects urban carbon emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    14. Barbosa, Sergio & Sáiz, Patricio & Zofío, José L., 2024. "The emergence and historical evolution of innovation networks: On the factors promoting and hampering patent collaboration in technological lagging economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Tong Yang & Cui Zhang, 2025. "Taxation Business Environment Optimization and Enterprise Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China’s Policy Tests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Liwen Sun & Ying Han, 2022. "Spatial Correlation Network Structure and Influencing Factors of Two-Stage Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Zhang, Wei & Liu, Xuemeng & Wang, Die & Zhou, Jianping, 2022. "Digital economy and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China's city level," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Lingling Tan & Kehui Wang & Huifang Zhang, 2025. "How Does Digital Transformation Catalyze New-Quality Productivity? Unraveling the Path Through Green Innovation and the Role of Digital Financial Inclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-32, October.
    6. Lu, Xiaowei & Wang, Jiexiang, 2024. "Is innovation strategy a catalyst to solve social problems? The impact of R&D and non-R&D innovation strategies on the performance of social innovation-oriented firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Xu, Yong & Ji, Junzhe & Li, Nicolas & Borah, Dhruba, 2024. "How do executive excess compensation affect enterprise technological innovation: Evidence from a panel threshold model of chinese biopharmaceutical companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Xiaoling Yuan & Baojing Han & Shubei Wang & Jiangyang Zhang, 2025. "Deconstructing the Digital Economy: A New Measurement Framework for Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, August.
    9. Huaxue Zhao & Yu Cheng & Ruijing Zheng, 2022. "Impact of the Digital Economy on PM 2.5 : Experience from the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Horvey, Sylvester Senyo & Odei-Mensah, Jones & Moloi, Tankiso & Bokpin, Godfred A., 2024. "Digital economy, financial development and energy transition in Africa: Exploring for synergies and nonlinearities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PB).
    11. Yuanlong Mao & Wenjing Dai & Yang Yang & Qiaoxia Liang & Zichao Wei, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of the Digital Economy on Carbon Emission Reduction: A Test of the Mediation Effect Based on Industrial Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Chunhua Luo & Dianlong Wei & Wunhong Su & Jinjing Lu, 2023. "Association between Regional Digitalization and High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Ma, Dan & Zhu, Qing, 2022. "Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 801-813.
    14. Wang, Shucui & Peng, Ting & Du, Anna Min & Lin, Xiaohui, 2025. "The impact of the digital economy on rural industrial revitalization," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    15. Qiong Liu & Junhua Guo, 2025. "The Effects of Government R&D Investment and Policy Ambiguity on Regional Innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 8060-8084, June.
    16. Ding, Qian & Huang, Jianbai & Chen, Jinyu & Tao, Dali, 2023. "Internet development and renewable energy technological innovation: Does institutional quality matter?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    17. Hedan Ma & Xinliang Jia & Xin Wang, 2022. "Digital Transformation, Ambidextrous Innovation and Enterprise Value: Empirical Analysis Based on Listed Chinese Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Lingchao Li & Shu Jiang & Yingtien Lin, 2025. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Sustainable Fisheries: Insights from Green Total Factor Productivity in China’s Coastal Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-22, March.
    19. Wang, Qian & Ren, Shuming, 2022. "Evaluation of green technology innovation efficiency in a regional context: A dynamic network slacks-based measuring approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Dong, Kangyin & Liu, Yang & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Xiucheng, 2024. "Is the digital economy an effective tool for decreasing energy vulnerability? A global case," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4058-:d:1646917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.