IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3669-d1637534.html

Sustainable Goat Farming in Southeastern Tunisia: Challenges and Opportunities for Profitability

Author

Listed:
  • Rihab Day

    (Research Laboratory: Support for the Sustainability of Agricultural Production in the Northwestern Region, Higher School of Agriculture of Kef, University of Jendouba, Le Kef 7119, Tunisia)

  • Aziza Mohamed-Brahmi

    (Research Laboratory: Support for the Sustainability of Agricultural Production in the Northwestern Region, Higher School of Agriculture of Kef, University of Jendouba, Le Kef 7119, Tunisia)

  • Fatma Aribi

    (Laboratory of Rural Economy and Society (LESOR), Arid Regions Institute of Medenine (IRA), Djorf Road Km 22.5, Medenine 4119, Tunisia)

  • Mohamed Jaouad

    (Laboratory of Rural Economy and Society (LESOR), Arid Regions Institute of Medenine (IRA), Djorf Road Km 22.5, Medenine 4119, Tunisia)

Abstract

Goat farming represents a critical component of rural livelihoods, food security, and cultural heritage in southeastern Tunisia. This study adopts a multi-stakeholder approach to analyze the goat value chain in Tataouine, incorporating focus groups, semi-structured questionnaires, and direct observations with 80 farmers, 3 veterinarians, 13 butchers, and 100 consumers. The findings reveal strong local demand, with 72% of consumers purchasing goat meat and 66% consuming milk. However, significant inefficiencies exist, particularly a misalignment between production and market requirements: while 92% of butchers prefer fattened animals, only 16% of farmers engage in fattening practices. Women constitute 49% of dairy processors, yet face persistent resource constraints. Climate pressures exacerbate these challenges, with 80% of farmers reporting water scarcity and 93.8% observing pasture degradation. Three strategic interventions emerge as pivotal for sustainable development: targeted support for feed-efficient fattening techniques, establishment of women-led dairy processing collectives, and implementation of climate-resilient water management systems. These measures address core constraints while leveraging existing strengths of the production system. The study presents a transferable framework for livestock value chain analysis in arid regions, demonstrating how integrated approaches can enhance both economic viability and adaptive capacity while preserving traditional pastoral systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Rihab Day & Aziza Mohamed-Brahmi & Fatma Aribi & Mohamed Jaouad, 2025. "Sustainable Goat Farming in Southeastern Tunisia: Challenges and Opportunities for Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3669-:d:1637534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3669/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3669/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoyan Zhu & Guangyao Wang, 2024. "Impact of Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers’ Collective Action: A Study Based on the Socio-Ecological System Framework," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Francisco Benitez‐Altuna & Valentina C. Materia & Jos Bijman & Daniel Gaitán‐Cremaschi & Jacques Trienekens, 2024. "Farmer–buyer relationships and sustainable agricultural practices in the food supply chain: The case of vegetables in Chile," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 3-30, January.
    3. Blessing Gumindoga & Adaph T Chikaka, 2024. "Evaluating Buhera and Nkayi Goat Value Chains in Agroecological Zone V of Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 9(6), pages 425-434, June.
    4. Carlo Pietrobelli & Federica Saliola, 2008. "Power relationships along the value chain: multinational firms, global buyers and performance of local suppliers," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 32(6), pages 947-962, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bahar, Dany & Rosenow, Samuel & Stein, Ernesto & Wagner, Rodrigo, 2019. "Export take-offs and acceleration: Unpacking cross-sector linkages in the evolution of comparative advantage," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 48-60.
    2. Benoît Mahy & François Rycx & Guillaume Vermeylen & Mélanie Volral, 2022. "Productivity and wage effects of firm‐level upstreamness: Evidence from Belgian linked panel data," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 2222-2250, July.
    3. Rich, Karl M. & Ross, R. Brent & Baker, A. Derek & Negassa, Asfaw, 2011. "Quantifying value chain analysis in the context of livestock systems in developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 214-222, April.
    4. Anna Giunta & Domenico Scalera & Francesco Trivieri & Jeffrey B. Nugent & Mariarosaria Agostino, 2011. "Firm Productivity, Organizational Choice and Global Value Chain," Working Papers 2011R09, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    5. Eduardo Letelier Araya & Luis Moraga Gálvez & Matías Urbina Morales, 2025. "Short food supply chain adoption in Chilean organic and agroecological organizations: a qualitative comparative analysis," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Shiyu Sheng & Yingjie Li & Zebin Zhao, 2026. "How does regional policy coordination help achieve the low-carbon development?: a study of theoretical mechanisms and empirical analysis from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 2779-2811, February.
    7. Bijun Wang & Rui Mao & Qin Gou, 2014. "Overseas Impacts of China's Outward Direct Investment," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 9(2), pages 227-249, July.
    8. Pham, Hanh Song Thi & Petersen, Bent, 2021. "The bargaining power, value capture, and export performance of Vietnamese manufacturers in global value chains," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    9. Ivonne Soraya Burgos Villamar & Luis Eduardo Solís Granda & Jorge Fabricio Guevara Viejó & Juan Diego Valenzuela Cobos, 2025. "Analysis of the Impact of Information Behavior on the Marketing and Fertilization Strategies of Small Cocoa Producers in the Provinces of Guayas and Los Ríos in Ecuador," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Pietrobelli, Carlo & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2011. "Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems: Are There Learning Opportunities for Developing Countries?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 1261-1269, July.
    11. Riedel, Bettina, 2009. "A value chain and cluster perspective on competitiveness of European fresh vegetable production – Case studies from Germany, Italy, and Spain," DEIAgra Working Papers 54094, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Engineering.
    12. Shahid Yusuf & Kaoru Nabeshima, 2009. "Growth through Innovation : An Industrial Strategy for Shanghai," World Bank Publications - Reports 18613, The World Bank Group.
    13. McWilliam, Sarah E. & Kim, Jung Kwan & Mudambi, Ram & Nielsen, Bo Bernhard, 2020. "Global value chain governance: Intersections with international business," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    14. Ge, Shuang & Liu, Xielin, 2022. "The role of knowledge creation, absorption and acquisition in determining national competitive advantage," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Yoshimichi Murakami & Keijiro Otsuka, 2017. "A Review of the Literature on Productivity Impacts of Global Value Chains and Foreign Direct Investment: Towards an Integrated Approach," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-19, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised Aug 2019.
    16. Navas-Alemán, Lizbeth & Pietrobelli, Carlo & Kamiya, Marco, 2012. "Inter-Firm Linkages and Finance in Value Chains," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4067, Inter-American Development Bank.
    17. Imami, Drini & Valentinov, Vladislav & Skreli, Engjell, 2021. "Food safety and value chain coordination in the context of a transition economy: The role of agricultural cooperatives," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 21-34.
    18. Myrzaliyev, Borash S. & Chetin, Samet & Azretbergenova, Gulmira Zh., 2022. "Improving the Evaluation of the Competitive Ability of the National Market of Meat and Meat Products of Kazakhstan," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(03), September.
    19. Xue Wang & Mingyu Wang & Lianbing Gong & Chuangchuang Yu, 2025. "Understanding the Rise and Fall of Rural Specialty Agriculture from Social–Ecological Land System Perspective: A Longitudinal Case Study in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, January.
    20. Thanyaporn Soontornthum & Lin Cui & Vinh N. Lu & Jiafu Su, 2020. "Enabling SMEs’ Learning from Global Value Chains: Linking the Logic of Power and the Logic of Embeddedness of Interfirm Relations," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 543-571, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3669-:d:1637534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.