IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijofsd/346680.html

Improving the Evaluation of the Competitive Ability of the National Market of Meat and Meat Products of Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Myrzaliyev, Borash S.
  • Chetin, Samet
  • Azretbergenova, Gulmira Zh.

Abstract

This article considers the economic nature of competition and competitive ability in modern conditions of economic development, reveals features of the competitive environment of the meat market, identifies factors for increasing the competitive ability of meat industry. The methodological foundations of increasing the competitiveness of the national market of meat products in Kazakhstan are examined. The provisions and principles of a systematic approach to ensuring the development of the meat industry in the agro-industrial complex are examined. The performance rating of livestock and poultry meat production in the countries of Central Asia is determined.

Suggested Citation

  • Myrzaliyev, Borash S. & Chetin, Samet & Azretbergenova, Gulmira Zh., 2022. "Improving the Evaluation of the Competitive Ability of the National Market of Meat and Meat Products of Kazakhstan," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(03), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346680
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.346680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/346680/files/IMPROVING%20THE%20EVALUATION.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.346680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig Gundersen & James P Ziliak, 2018. "Food Insecurity Research in the United States: Where We Have Been and Where We Need to Go," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 119-135.
    2. Marc F. Bellemare & Metin Çakir & Hikaru Hanawa Peterson & Lindsey Novak & Jeta Rudi, 2017. "On the Measurement of Food Waste," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1148-1158.
    3. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens, 2017. "The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 3-32, Spring.
    4. Junior Davis, 2006. "Rural non-farm livelihoods in transition economies: emerging issues and policies," The Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vol. 3(2), pages 180-224.
    5. Jayson L Lusk & Jill McCluskey, 2018. "Understanding the Impacts of Food Consumer Choice and Food Policy Outcomes," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 5-21.
    6. Conner Mullally & Jayson L Lusk, 2018. "The Impact of Farm Animal Housing Restrictions on Egg Prices, Consumer Welfare, and Production in California," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(3), pages 649-669.
    7. Stephan J Goetz & Mark D Partridge & Heather M Stephens, 2018. "The Economic Status of Rural America in the President Trump Era and beyond," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 97-118.
    8. Bogdanov, Natalija & Moslavac, Nenad, 2007. "Needs Assessment Analysis of Small Rural Households in Serbia," 100th Seminar, June 21-23, 2007, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro 162346, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Carlo Pietrobelli & Federica Saliola, 2008. "Power relationships along the value chain: multinational firms, global buyers and performance of local suppliers," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 32(6), pages 947-962, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brenna Ellison & Mary K Muth & Elise Golan, 2019. "Opportunities and Challenges in Conducting Economic Research on Food Loss and Waste," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Franklin Bailey Norwood & Glynn Tonsor & Jayson L Lusk, 2019. "I Will Give You My Vote but Not My Money: Preferences for Public versus Private Action in Addressing Social Issues," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 96-132, March.
    3. Sarah A. Low & Martha Bass & Dawn Thilmany & Marcelo Castillo, 2021. "Local Foods Go Downstream: Exploring the Spatial Factors Driving U.S. Food Manufacturing," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 896-915, September.
    4. Kelsey L Conley & Jayson L Lusk, 2019. "What to Eat When Having a Millennial over for Dinner," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 56-70, March.
    5. Josephson, Anna & Michler, Jeffrey D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Beasts of the field? Ethics in agricultural and applied economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Lai, Yufeng & Boaitey, Albert & Minegishi, Kota, 2022. "Behind the veil: Social desirability bias and animal welfare ballot initiatives," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    7. Hopkins, Kelsey A. & McKendree, Melissa G. S. & Rice, Emma D., 2020. "Understanding the U.S. Publics’ Voting on Animal Welfare and Genetically Modified Organism Labeling Ballot Initiatives," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304519, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Masahiro Kato & Akari Ohda, 2023. "Asymptotically Unbiased Synthetic Control Methods by Moment Matching," Papers 2307.11127, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    9. Craig Gundersen, 2021. "Are College Students More Likely to Be Food Insecure than Nonstudents of Similar Ages?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1476-1486, December.
    10. Orhan Erdem & Sukran Erdem & Kelly Monson, 2023. "Children, vaccines, and financial incentives," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 537-552, December.
    11. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    12. Lechner, Michael, 2018. "Modified Causal Forests for Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 12040, IZA Network @ LISER.
    13. Wei Chen & Zaiyan Wei & Karen Xie, 2022. "The Battle for Homes: How Does Home Sharing Disrupt Local Residential Markets?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8589-8612, December.
    14. James P. Ziliak, 2021. "Food Hardship during the COVID‐19 Pandemic and Great Recession," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 132-152, March.
    15. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2020. "Energy mix persistence and the effect of carbon pricing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 555-574, July.
    16. Cruz A. Echevarría & Serhat Hasancebi & Javier García-Enríquez, 2022. "Economic Effects of Macao’s Integration with Mainland China: A Causal Inference Study," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 37(2), pages 179-215.
    17. Craig Gundersen, 2019. "Food Assistance Programmes and Food Insecurity in the United States," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 18(1), pages 56-61, April.
    18. Min, Shi & Wang, Xiaobing & Yu, Xiaohua, 2021. "Does dietary knowledge affect household food waste in the developing economy of China?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    19. Francesco Vidoli, 2026. "The Geography of Impact: Endogenous Spatial Clustering for Difference-in-Differences Estimation," Working Papers 2601, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2026.
    20. Eliason, Paul & Lutz, Byron, 2018. "Can fiscal rules constrain the size of government? An analysis of the “crown jewel” of tax and expenditure limitations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 115-144.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/centmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.