IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v40y2018i1p97-118..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Status of Rural America in the President Trump Era and beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan J Goetz
  • Mark D Partridge
  • Heather M Stephens

Abstract

To set the stage for future research aimed at developing public policies that support economic prosperity in rural areas, we review the current economic conditions of rural America and the current literature. Rural America is often characterized as a uniform, distressed place where agriculture dominates. In fact, rural America is diverse, with many regions doing well economically. In some areas, labor-saving technologies have reduced the workforce in manufacturing and resource-dependent industries. However, integration with urban areas has weakened the economic divide between urban and some rural areas, while natural amenities have boosted the fortunes of others. There is also evidence that homegrown enterprises can support growth even in the most remote, distressed regions. To support economic growth, policies should recognize the unique features of each place or region and balance the farm sector with the larger nonfarm rural economy. Economists are well-positioned to provide research-based evidence of what works, as well as rigorous evaluation of new polices.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan J Goetz & Mark D Partridge & Heather M Stephens, 2018. "The Economic Status of Rural America in the President Trump Era and beyond," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 97-118.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:1:p:97-118.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/ppx061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tessa Conroy & Sarah A. Low, 2022. "Opportunity, necessity, and no one in the middle: A closer look at small, rural, and female‐led entrepreneurship in the United States," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 162-196, March.
    2. Jeffrey K. O'Hara & Marcelo Castillo & Dawn Thilmany McFadden, 2021. "Do Cottage Food Laws Reduce Barriers to Entry for Food Manufacturers?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 935-951, September.
    3. Yanyu Wang & Robert Tian, 2023. "Development of Rural Regions in China: Evidence of Industry Integration by the Residents of Yongan Village (Quanzhou City, China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. George W. Norton, 2020. "Lessons from a Career in Agricultural Development and Research Evaluation," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(2), pages 151-167, June.
    5. Stephan J. Goetz & Meri Davlasheridze & Yicheol Han & David A. Fleming-Muñoz, 2019. "Explaining the 2016 Vote for President Trump across U.S. Counties," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 703-722, December.
    6. Goetz, Stephan J. & Davlasheridze, Meri, 2017. "Explaining Spatial Disparities in Drug Overdoses, 1970-2014," 2018 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 5-7, 2018, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 266296, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Tomaz Ponce Dentinho & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Regional Science Perspectives On Global Sustainable Development €“ An Exploration Of Multidimensional Expert Views By Means Of Q Analysis," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, JUNE.
    8. Partridge, Mark D. & Tsvetkova, Alexandra, 2018. "Local ability to "rewire" and socioeconomic performance: Evidence from US counties before and after the Great Recession," MPRA Paper 89313, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Casola, William R. & Peterson, M. Nils & Sills, Erin O. & Pacifici, Krishna & Moorman, Christopher E., 2022. "Economic contributions of wildlife management areas in North Carolina," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Mark Partridge & Seung‐hun Chung & Sydney Schreiner Wertz, 2022. "Lessons from the 2020 Covid recession for understanding regional resilience," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1006-1031, September.
    11. Josephson, Anna & Michler, Jeffrey D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Beasts of the field? Ethics in agricultural and applied economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-11.
    12. Sarah A. Low & Martha Bass & Dawn Thilmany & Marcelo Castillo, 2021. "Local Foods Go Downstream: Exploring the Spatial Factors Driving U.S. Food Manufacturing," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 896-915, September.
    13. Deena A. Isom & Hunter M. Boehme & Toniqua C. Mikell & Stephen Chicoine & Marion Renner, 2021. "Status Threat, Social Concerns, and Conservative Media: A Look at White America and the Alt-Right," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Kenneth M. Johnson & Daniel T. Lichter, 2020. "Metropolitan Reclassification and the Urbanization of Rural America," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(5), pages 1929-1950, October.
    15. Becca B.R. Jablonski & Allison Bauman & Dawn Thilmany, 2021. "Local Food Market Orientation and Labor Intensity," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 916-934, September.
    16. Tim Bartik, 2023. "Seize the Time: Needed Research on Local Economic Development in an Era of Increased Attention to Problems of Place," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(1), pages 7-13, February.
    17. Samuel Taylor & Heather M. Stephens & Daniel Grossman, 2022. "The opioid crisis and economic distress: Consequences for population change," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 541-577, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:1:p:97-118.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.